Polymeric foam with lightweight and higher impact strength has been used in many fields due to cost reduction and higher toughness. However, it is often difficult to improve their mechanical property especially tear strength. Here, a double foaming system was designed to increase the tear strength of the foamed ethylene–propylene–diene monomer, styrene–butadiene rubber, and thermoplastic rubber (EPDM/SBR/TPR) materials. The cell size of EPDM/SBR/TPR foam and cell distribution were investigated by scanning electron microscopy, which showed that the cells present a bimodal structure. Besides, the tear strength can reach up to 10 N/mm when the density is about 0.40 g/cm3, which is much superior to those of most engineering plastic foams. Meanwhile, the crystallization property of EPDM/SBR/TPR foams was also demonstrated by X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis, and differential scanning calorimetry, which indicates that the double foaming system can reduce the crystallization of EPDM/SBR/TPR molecular chains. In addition, the variation of thermal conductivity values depends on the gradual decrease effect of the cell size.
HilyardNCCunninghamA. Low density cellular plastics: physical basis of behaviour. Netherlands: Springer, 1994.
2.
CaoWShaoFWangH, et al.Research and development of micro porous concrete and polystyrene foam plastics in composite wall material. In: Proceedings of the 2016 International conference on architectural engineering and civil engineering, Shanghai, China, 9–11 December 2016, pp. 245–248. Paris, France: Atlantis Press.
3.
KroonRRyanJDKieferD, et al.Bulk doping of millimeter-thick conjugated polymer foams for plastic thermoelectrics. Adv Funct Mater2017; 27: 1704183.
4.
BondererLJStudartARGaucklerLJ. Bioinspired design and assembly of platelet reinforced polymer films. Science2008; 319: 1069–1073.
5.
YoshiharaHAtakaNMarutaM. Measurement of the Young’s modulus and shear modulus of extruded polystyrene foam by the longitudinal and flexural vibration methods. J Cell Plast201654: 199–216.
6.
HengLLiJLiM, et al.Porous films: ordered honeycomb structure surface generated by breath figures for liquid reprography. Adv Funct Mater2015; 24: 7226.
7.
CarrotCSadikTPillotC, et al.Polypropylene structural foams: measurements of the core, skin and overall mechanical properties with evaluation of predictive models. J Cell Plast2017; 53: 25–44.
8.
WanSPengJLiY, et al.Use of synergistic interactions to fabricate strong, tough, and conductive artificial nacre based on graphene oxide and chitosan. ACS Nano2015; 9: 9830–9836.
9.
XuLXiaoLJiaP, et al.Lightweight and ultrastrong polymer foams with unusually superior flame retardancy. ACS Appl Mater Inter2017; 9: 26392–26399.
10.
ChoiSSParkBHSongH. Influence of filler type and content on properties of styrene–butadiene rubber (SBR) compound reinforced with carbon black or silica. Polym Adv Technol2004; 15: 122–127.
11.
YuDRKimGH. Improvement of tensile properties and elastic recovery in ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymer/multiwalled carbon nanotube nanocomposite foams. J Appl Polym Sci2011; 121: 3696–3701.
12.
AcharyaHSrivastavaSK. EPDM/silicone blend layered silicate nanocomposite by solution intercalation method: morphology and properties. Polym Compos2014; 35: 1834–1841.
13.
VahidifarAKhorasaniSNParkCB, et al.Fabrication and characterization of closed-cell rubber foams based on natural rubber/carbon black by one-step foam processing. Ind Eng Chem Res2016; 55: 2407–2416.
14.
MostafaAShankarKMorozovEV. Behaviour of PU-foam/glass–fibre composite sandwich panels under flexural static load. Mater Struct2015; 48: 1545–1559.
15.
SuntakoR. Effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles synthesized by a precipitation method on mechanical and morphological properties of the CR foam. Bull Mater Sci2015; 38: 1033–1038.
16.
DengFQMaJZXueCH, et al.Effect of organic montmorillonite on the cellular structure and mechanical properties of POE/EVA/OMMT nanocomposite foams. Adv Mater Res2013; 641–642: 355–362.
17.
XinHYZhongMLiZ, et al.Preparation and characterization of graft copolymer EVA-g-PU. J Macrom Sci D2008; 47: 1214–1219.
18.
MaJDuanZXueC, et al.Morphology and mechanical properties of EVA/OMMT nanocomposite foams. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2013; 26: 555–569.
19.
AbadyNARMovahedSO. The effect of curing system on the properties of the thermoplastic elastomer foams of ethylene‐vinyl acetate copolymer and styrene‐butadiene and ethylene‐propylene‐diene monomer rubbers. J Appl Polym Sci2017; 14: 257.
20.
ShaoLJiZYMaJZ, et al.The synergy of double cross-linking agents on the properties of styrene–butadiene rubber foams. Sci Rep2016; 6: 36931.
21.
WangXFengNChangS. Effect of precured degrees on morphology, thermal, and mechanical properties of BR/SBR/NR foams. Polym Compos2013; 34: 849–859.
22.
HussainSParkerKGarancherJP. Investigating foamed polylactic acid films through cell structure alteration and processing conditions. J Cell Plast2017; 53: 513–523.
23.
ChenJLiuTZhaoL, et al.Determination of CO2 solubility in isotactic polypropylene melts with different polydispersities using magnetic suspension balance combined with swelling correction. Thermochim Acta2012; 530: 79–86.
24.
BaoJBLiuTZhaoL, et al.A two-step depressurization batch process for the formation of bi-modal cell structure polystyrene foams using scCO2. J Supercrit Fluid2011; 55: 1104–1114.
25.
JiangGPYangJF. Extrusion of highly porous silicon nitride ceramics with bimodal pore structure and improved gas permeability. J Am Ceram Soc2017; 101: 520–524.
26.
JeongTGChunJChoBW, et al.Enhanced performance of sulfur-infiltrated bimodal mesoporous carbon foam by chemical solution deposition as cathode materials for lithium sulfur batteries. Sci Rep2017; 7: 42238.
27.
YehSKChenYRKangTW, et al.Different approaches for creating nanocellular TPU foams by supercritical CO2 foaming. J Polym Res2018; 25: 30.
28.
GuJLiangCZhaoX, et al.Highly thermally conductive flame-retardant epoxy nanocomposites with reduced ignitability and excellent electrical conductivities. Compos Sci Technol2017; 139: 83–89.
KimJHKimJMParkS, et al.Synthesis and cryogenic mechanical properties of CO2 -blown carbon-reinforced polyurethane foam. J Cell Plast2017; 54: 743–763.
31.
GuJYangXLvZ, et al.Functionalized graphite nanoplatelets/epoxy resin nanocomposites with high thermal conductivity. Int J Heat Mass Tran2016; 92: 15–22.
32.
PhamTMKingstonJStricklandG, et al.Effect of crumb rubber on mechanical properties of multi-phase syntactic foams. Polym Test2018; 66: 1–12.
33.
SanbornBSongB. Effect of pre-strain, processing conditions, and impact velocity on energy dissipation in silicone foams and rubber. Soc Exp Mech2018; 2: 9.
34.
LiuSHuangZRuiW. A carbon foam with a bimodal micro–mesoporous structure prepared from larch sawdust for the gas-phase toluene adsorption. Mater Res Bull2013; 48: 2437–2441.
35.
YousefianHRodrigueD. Morphological, physical and mechanical properties of nano-crystalline cellulose (NCC) filled Nylon 6 foams. J Cell Plast2016; 53: 253–271.
36.
MosanenzadehSGNaguibHEParkCB, et al.Development of polylactide open-cell foams with bimodal structure for high-acoustic absorption. J Appl Polym Sci2014; 131: 2113.
37.
HoffmannCLangMHeidemeyerP, et al.Foam extrusion of PP-based wood plastic composites with chemical blowing agents and the Celuka technique. J Cell Plast2016; 53: 623–638.
38.
ZeltmannSEChenBGuptaN. Thermal expansion and dynamic mechanical analysis of epoxy matrix–borosilicate glass hollow particle syntactic foams. J Cell Plast2017; 54: 463–481.
39.
KoruM. Determination of thermal conductivity of closed-cell insulation materials that depend on temperature and density. J Sci Eng2016; 41: 4337–4346.
40.
FilimonovSVKamaevAOShornikovaON, et al.Heat-conducting properties of high-temperature materials based on graphite foam. Refract Ind Ceram2016; 57: 155–159.
