Public Attitudes Toward Diversity,Promotion,and Leadership in the U.S. Military

Abstract

This article explores how the public understands military service and diversity. Using a conjoint survey experiment, we ask respondents to select between two candidates for promotion. We randomly present respondents’ two profiles, which vary the candidates’ gender, race, sexual orientation, marital status, number of years served, number of deployments, combat experience, and branch of the military. We find that respondents do not discount candidates based on their branch of service, gender, race, or marital status. However, respondents do weigh the candidates’ combat experience, number of years served, and number of deployments favorably. Finally, respondents penalize candidates based on their sexual orientation: Homosexual individuals are less likely to be selected for promotion. Furthermore, respondents especially discounted transgender individuals for promotion. Important differences, we show in this article, also exist between conservative and liberal respondents, as well as between male and female respondents.

Keywords

diversity inclusion public opinion professionalism/leadership gender issues sexual orientation military culture

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arkin

Dobrofsky

L. R.

(1978). Military socialization and masculinity. Journal of Social Issues, 34(1), 151–168.

Armor

D. J.

(1996). Race and gender in the US military. Armed Forces & Society, 23(1), 7–27.

Baldwin

J. N.

(1996). Female promotions in male-dominant organizations: The case of the United States military. The Journal of Politics, 58(4), 1184–1197.

Barta

Kleiner

Neumann

(2012, April 1). Is there a payoff from top-team diversity? McKinsey Quarterly. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/is-there-a-payoff-from-top-team-diversity#

Burk

(1995). Citizenship status and military service: The quest for inclusion by minorities and conscientious objectors. Armed Forces & Society, 21(4), 503–529.

Cohn

Enloe

(2003). A conversation with Cynthia Enloe: Feminists look at masculinity and the men who wage war. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(4), 1187–1107.

Cooper

(2020a, June 25). Addressing diversity, army will remove photos of officer candidates in promotion reviews. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/25/us/politics/army-pentagon-race-promotions.html

Cooper

(2020b, May 25). African-Americans are highly visible in the military, but almost invisible at the top. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/25/us/politics/military-minorities-leadership.html

Coppock

McClellan

O. A.

(2019). Validating the demographic, political, psychological, and experimental results obtained from a new source of online survey respondents. Research & Politics, 6(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018822174

10.

De Angelis

. (2017). Rising minority: Hispanics in the US military ( Rohall

D. E.

Ender

M. G.

Matthews

M. D.

, Eds., pp. 37–56). Lexington Books.

11.

Demographics of the U.S. Military. (2020, July 13). Council on foreign relations. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/demographics-us-military

12.

Department of Defense. (2020, December 18). Diversity and inclusion final board report. https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/2452750/diversity-and-inclusion-final-board-report/

13.

Enloe

C. H.

(1983). Does khaki become you? The militarisation of women’s lives. South End Press.

14.

Golby

(2020, June 18). America’s politicized military is a recipe for disaster. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/06/18/us-military-politics-trump-election-campaign/

15.

Goldberg

(2020, June 3). James Mattis denounces Trump as a threat to the constitution. Defense One. https://www.defenseone.com/ideas/2020/06/james-mattis-denounces-trump-threat-constitution/165891/

16.

Goodhart

Taylor

J. K.

(2020). LGBT military service policies in the United States. In W. R. Thompson (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1289.

17.

Graham

Haidt

Koleva

Motyl

Iyer

Wojcik

S. P.

Ditto

P. H.

(2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55–130.

18.

Haidt

(2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Vintage.

19.

Hainmueller

Hopkins

Yamamoto

(2014). Causal inference in conjoint analysis: understanding multidimensional choices via stated preference experiments. Political Analysis, 22(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpt024

20.

Han

(2017). African-Americans in the US military. In Rohall

D. E.

Ender

M. G.

Matthews

M. D.

(Eds.), Inclusion in the American military (pp. 19–36). Lexington Books.

21.

Harrington

A. I.

(2020, October 26). What the air force can teach the country about trust and inclusion. War on the Rocks. https://warontherocks.com/2020/10/what-the-air-force-can-teach-the-country-about-trust-and-inclusion/

22.

Horiuchi

Markovich

Z. D.

Yamamoto

(2020). Does conjoint analysis mitigate social desirability bias? (SSRN scholarly paper ID 3219323). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3219323

23.

Kamarck

K. N.

(2019). Diversity, inclusion, and equal opportunity in the armed services: Background and issues for congress (No. R44321, p. 64). Congressional Research Service. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R44321.pdf

24.

Krebs

R. R.

(2006). Fighting for rights: Military service and the politics of citizenship. Cornell University Press.

25.

Krebs

R. R.

(2009). The citizen-soldier tradition in the United States: Has its demise been greatly exaggerated? Armed Forces & Society, 36(1), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X09337370

26.

Krebs

R. R.

Ralston

Rapport

(2018, December 3). Americans’ blind faith in the military is dangerous. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/12/03/americans-blind-faith-in-the-military-is-dangerous-civilian-oversight-deference-mcraven-trump/

27.

Lim

Mariano

L. T.

Cox

A. G.

Schulker

Hanser

L. M.

(2014). Improving demographic diversity in the U.S. air force officer corps (No. RR495). RAND. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR495.html

28.

Lyall

(2020a). Divided armies: Inequality and battlefield performance in modern war. Princeton University Press.

29.

Lyall

(2020b, February 19). The strongest military is an inclusive one. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2020-02-14/strongest-military-inclusive-one

30.

MacKenzie

(2015). Beyond the band of brothers: The US military and the myth that women can’t fight. Cambridge University Press.

31.

Moore

D. W.

Trout

B. T.

(1978). Military advancement: The visibility theory of promotion. The American Political Science Review, 72, 452–468.

32.

Moradi

Miller

(2010). Attitudes of Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans toward gay and lesbian service members. Armed Forces & Society, 36(3), 397–419.

33.

Mueller

Mazur

(1996). Facial dominance of West Point cadets as a predictor of later military rank. Social Forces, 74(3), 823–850.

34.

Norton

A. T.

Herek

G. M.

(2013). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward transgender people: Findings from a national probability sample of US adults. Sex Roles, 68(11–12), 738–753.

35.

Ray

V. E.

(2018). Critical diversity in the US military: From diversity to racialized organizations. In Embrick

Collins

Dodson

(Eds.), Challenging the status quo (pp. 287–300). Brill.

36.

Reilly

Hillman

E. L.

Koltnow

(2020). US military service and LGBT policy. In W. R. Thompson (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of politics. Oxford University Press.

37.

Reyes

A. D.

(2006). Strategic options for managing diversity in the US army [Military fellow research report]. Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies. https://diversity.defense.gov/Portals/51/Documents/Resources/Commission/docs/Business%20Case/Strategic%20Options%20for%20Managing%20Diversity%20in%20the%20Army.pdf

38.

Rohall

D. E.

Ender

M. G.

Matthews

M. D.

(2017a). Diversity in the military. In Rohall

D. E.

Ender

M. G.

Matthews

M. D.

(Eds.), Inclusion in the American military: A force for diversity (pp. 1–16). Lexington Books.

39.

Rohall

D. E.

Ender

M. G.

Matthews

M. D.

(Eds.). (2017b). Inclusion in the American military: A force for diversity. Lexington Books.

40.

Smith

III . (2010). Why black officers still fail. US Army War College. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA520126.pdf

41.

Snyder

R. C.

(2003). The citizen-soldier tradition and gender integration of the US military. Armed Forces & Society, 29(2), 185–204.

42.

Spindel

Ralston

(2020). Taking social cohesion to task: Perceptions of transgender military inclusion and concepts of cohesion. Journal of Global Security Studies, 5(1), 80–96.

43.

Stracqualursi

(2020, June 5). The prominent ex-military leaders who have criticized Trump’s actions over protests. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/05/politics/military-leaders-trump-floyd-protests/index.html

44.

Strezhnev

Hainmueller

Hopkins

Yamamoto

(2014). Conjoint survey design tool: software manual. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5931baca440243906ef65ca3/t/5966f031e6f2e19151858816/1499918387461/conjoint_sdt_manual.pdf.

45.

Tufts University. (2006, April 10). Racial diversity improves group decision making in unexpected ways, according to tufts university research. ScienceDaily. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/04/060410162259.htm

46.

United States Army (n.d.). About diversity. https://www.armydiversity.army.mil/adoabout/index.html

47.

United States Navy. (n.d.). Navy diversity & equity. https://www.navy.com/who-weare/diversity#:~:text=Our%20mission%20is%20to%20continue,now%20and%20in%20the%20future

48.

Williams

K. B

. (2020, June 4). The generals are speaking up. Is that a good thing? Defense One. https://www.defenseone.com/policy/2020/06/generals-are-speaking-good-thing/165923/

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.67 MB