This is a commentary on Morris Janowitz’s article, “Military Institutions and Citizenship in Western Societies,” published in February 1976, in Armed Forces & Society, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 185–204. In the article, Janowitz links sociopolitical changes to the rise and subsequent fall of mass popular Armies. Military service during the 19th century was an integral part of citizenship. However, in the 1960s, mass militaries based on compulsory service began to transform into smaller volunteer forces “with profound implications for social structure, political power, and nationalism.” In this article, I highlight Janowitz’s analysis of the rise and fall of the mass armed forces. I also discuss the three sets of factors Janowitz used in his analysis: (a) technological and organizational change, (b) a rise in small professional militaries that are unrepresentative of the larger society, and (c) ideological and normative change. I end with a brief discussion on how Morris Janowitz’s legacy helps to shape our understanding of civil–military events that have taken place over the last 50 years.
BidermanA.SharpL. (1968). The convergence of military and civilian occupational structures evidence from studies of military retired employment. American Journal of Sociology, 73(4), 381–399.
BurkJ. (Ed.). (1991). Morris Janowitz: On social organization and social control. The University of Chicago Press.
5.
CampbellD.CampbellK. (2010). Soldiers as police officers/police officers as soldiers: Role evolution and revolution in the United States. Armed Forces & Society, 36(2), 327–350.
6.
ColettaD.CrosbieT. (2022). Janowitz and Huntington—Better together: A response. Armed Forces & Society, 48(3), 723–729.
7.
DonnellyW.GoodallJ. (Eds.). (2021). The United States Army and the COVID-19 pandemic January 2020-July 2021. Center of Military History, U.S. Army.
8.
EberlyD. (1977). National service alternative strategies. Armed Forces & Society, 3(3), 445–456.
9.
EricksonP.KljajicM.ShelefN. (2023). Domestic military deployments in response to COVID-19. Armed Forces & Society, 49(2), 350–371.
10.
FlemingB. (2010). Bridging the military-civilian divide: What each side should know about the other—And about itself. Potomac Books.
11.
HuntingtonS. (1957). The soldier and the state. University of Harvard Press.
12.
JanowitzM. (1971). The professional soldier: A social and political portrait. Free Press.
13.
JanowitzM. (1975). Decline of the mass armed force. In SaekesianS. (Ed.), Military conflict (pp. 121–128). Sage.
14.
JanowitzM. (1976). Military institutions and citizenship in western societies. Armed Forces & Society, 2(2), 185–204.
15.
JanowitzM. (1983). Civic consciousness and military performance. In JanowitzM.WesbrookS. D. (Eds.), The political education of soldiers (pp. 55–80). Sage.
16.
LasswellH. (1941). The Garrison state and the specialists on violence. American Journal of Sociology, 46, 455–468.
17.
LuceA.MartinezA. (2018). Morris Janowitz collection. Pritzker Military Museum and Library.
18.
MarshallT. H. (1950). Citizenship and social class. University of Cambridge Press.
19.
MooreB.Jr. (1966). Social origins of dictatorship and democracy: Lord and Peasant in the making of the Modern World. Beacon Press.
20.
MooreB. L. (2002). The propensity of junior enlisted personnel to remain in today’s military. Armed Forces & Society, 28(2), 257–278.
21.
Morris Janowitz Collection1940-1988, [Box #, Folder #], Hanna Holborn Gray Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library.
22.
MoskosC. C. (1977). From institution to occupation: Trends in military organization. Armed Forces & Society, 4(1), 41–50.
23.
MoskosC. C. (1992). Armed forces in a warless society. In KuhlmannJ.DandekerC. (Eds.), Armed forces after the cold war (pp. 1–19). SOWI.
24.
MoskosC. C.BurkJ. (1994). The postmodern military. In BurkJ. (Ed.), The military in New Times (pp. 117–140). Westview Press.
25.
MoskosC. C.WilliamsJ. A.SegalD. (2000). The postmodern military: Armed forces after the cold war. Oxford University Press.
26.
MoskosC. C.WoodF. R. (1988). The military more than just a job?Pergamon-Brassey’s.
27.
NielsenS.LiebertH. (2021). The continuing relevance of Morris Janowitz’s the professional soldier for the education of officers. Armed Forces & Society, 47(4), 732–749.
28.
NielsenS.LiebertH. (2023). The utility of Janowitz’s political awareness in officer education. Armed Forces & Society, 49(1), 201–206.
29.
SangerD.BrooksM. (2024). New cold wars: China’s rise, Russia’s invasion, and America’s struggle to defend the west. Penguin Random House Press.
30.
SegalD. R. (1985). Sociological and economic models of military manpower: An attempt at integration. In SuttlesG.ZaldM. (Eds.), The challenge of social control: Citizenship and institution building in modern society (pp. 161–180). Ablex.
31.
TravisD. S. (2017). Saving Samuel Huntington and the need for pragmatic civil-military relations. Armed Forces & Society, 43(3), 395–414.
32.
TravisD. S. (2020). Decoding Morris Janowitz: Limited war and pragmatic doctrine. Armed Forces & Society, 46(1), 68–91.
33.
U.S. Department of Defense. (1984). Occupational conversion manual: Enlisted/Officer/Civilian September. Office of Assistant Secretary of Defense, Manpower, Installations and Logistics.
34.
U.S. President’s Commission. (1970). The report of the President’s Commission on an all-volunteer force. Government Printing Office.
35.
WilliamsJ. A.MoskosC. (1997). Civil military relations after the cold war. In BeblerA. A. (Ed.), Civil-military relations in post-communist states (pp. 25–35). Praeger.
