As a result of the 1996 welfare reform—Temporary Aid to Needy Families (TANF)—the number of welfare recipients enrolled in postsecondary education has decreased dramatically. The new welfare law also gives states significant discretion to support and even promote postsecondary education for low-income adults; consequently, state policies regarding access vary widely. This study uses qualitative data from three states to examine the sources and consequences of state variation in access to postsecondary education for disadvantaged individuals. Our cross-state comparison shows that competing ideas about welfare, work and the role of education in the lives of welfare recipients help structure and shape political debates, and policy outcomes, in the each of the states. Ideas influenced policies via four key channels: the state human service agency; advocacy organizations; the persistence of the “work-first” idea within implementation processes; and the power of policy “signals” to drive state welfare reform.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Administration for Children and Families, Office of Research Planning and Evaluation. 2001. Available from http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/opre/particip/im00rate/table4a.htm.
2.
Baker, Linda Renee, and Joseph Cipfl. 2001. Letter regarding Advancing Opportunities program. Chicago: Illinois Department of Human Services.
3.
Ball, Stephen. 1994. What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. In Educational reform: A critical and post-structural approach, 14-27. London: Taylor-Francis.
4.
Bowe, Richard, and Stephen Ball. 1992. Reforming education and changing schools: Case studies in policy sociology. London: Routledge.
5.
Brodkin, Evelyn Z. 1997. Inside the welfare contract: Discretion and accountability in state welfare administration. Social Service Review71:1-33.
6.
Center for Law and Social Policy. 2002. Likely to cut access to postsecondary training or education under house-passed bill. Available from www.clasp.org.
7.
Gais, Thomas, Richard Nathan, Irene Lurie, and Thomas Kaplan. 2001. The implementation of the Personal Responsibility Act of 1996: Commonalities, variations and the challenge of complexity. Unpublished paper. New York: Rockefeller Institute of Government, State University of New York.
8.
Golonka, Susan, and Lisa Matus-Grossman. 2001. Opening doors: Expanding educational opportunities for low-income workers. New York: MDRC and National Governors Association Center for Best Practices.
9.
Government Accounting Office. 1998. Restructuring state welfare programs. Washington, DC: Government Accounting Office.
10.
Greenberg, Mark. 2001. How are TANF funds being used? The story in FY 2000. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy.
11.
Greenberg, Mark, Julie Strawn, and Lisa Plimpton. 2000. State opportunities to provide access to postsecondary education under TANF. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy.
12.
Grubb, W. Norton. 1999. The economic benefits of subbaccalaureate education: Results from state and local studies. Community College Research Center Brief no. 3. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
13.
Hall, Peter. 1989. The political power of economic ideas: Keynesianism across nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
———. 1997. The role of interests, institutions and ideas in the comparative political economy of the industrializing nations. In Comparative politics: Rationality, culture and structure, edited by Marc Lichbach and Irving Zuckerman, 174-207. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Illinois Community College Board. n.d. Advancing opportunities: A welfare to education to work program: Creating hope through education. Springfield: State of Illinois.
16.
Illinois Department of Human Services (IDHS). 2002. TANF focus groups: Final report: What do TANF customers want to see in reauthorization? Chicago: Illinois Department of Human Services.
17.
Institute for Women’s Policy Research. 1998. Welfare reform and postsecondary education: Research & policy update. Washington, DC: Institute for Women’s Policy Research.
18.
Jacobs, Jerry, and Kathleen Shaw. 1999. Welfare reform and community colleges. A proposal to the Atlantic Philanthropies. Unpublished Document.
19.
Jenson, Jane. 1989. Paradigms and political discourse: Protective legislation in France and the United States before 1914. Canadian Journal of Political Science22:235-58.
20.
Kane, Thomas, and Cecilia Rouse. 1995. Labor market returns to two and four-year college. American Economic Review85 (3): 600-28.
21.
Katz, Michael. 2001. The price of citizenship: Redefining the American welfare state. New York: Metropolitan Books.
22.
Kaye, Laura, Demetra Nightingale, Jodi Sandfort, and Lynne Fender. 2001. Changes in Massachusetts welfare and work, child care, and child welfare systems. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
23.
Kingdon, John. 1995. Agendas, alternatives and public policies. New York: HarperCollins.
24.
Kirby, Gretchen, LaDonna Pavetti, Karen McGuire, and Rebecca Clark. 1997. Income support and social services for low-income people in Massachusetts. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
25.
Klawitter, Marika. 2001. Effects of Work First activities on employment and earnings. Work First longitudinal study. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
26.
Levi, Margaret. 1997. A model, a method, and a map: Rational choice in comparative and historical analysis. In Comparative politics: Rationality, culture and structure, edited by Marc Lichbach and Irving Zuckerman, 19-41. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Levy, Frank, and Richard Murnane. 1992. U.S. earnings levels and earnings inequality: A review of recent trends and proposed explanations. Journal of Economic Literature30 (3): 1333-81.
28.
Lin, Ann Chih. 2000. Reform in the making: The implementation of social policy in prison. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
Lipsky, Mark. 1988. Street level bureaucracy. New York: Russell Sage.
30.
Lurie, Irene. 2001. Changing welfare offices. In The Brookings Institution, welfare reform and beyond. Policy brief no. 9. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
31.
Lurie, Irene, Marcia Meyers, and Norma Riccucci. 2001. Achieving goal congruence in complex environments: The case of welfare reform. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory11 (2): 165-201.
32.
March, James, and Johan Olson. 1995. Democratic governance. New York: Free Press.
33.
Massachusetts Department of Transitional Assistance. 2001a. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, statewide client participation by component through January 2001. Boston: Massachusetts Department of Transitional Assistance.
34.
———. 2001b. TAFDC caseload and participation breakdown as of 03/07/01. Boston: Massachusetts Department of Transitional Assistance.
35.
MassINC. 2000a. New skills for a new economy: Adult education’s key role in sustaining economic growth and expanding opportunity. Boston: Massachusetts Institute for a New Commonwealth.
36.
MassINC. 2000b. Opportunity knocks: Training the commonwealth’s workers for the new economy. Boston: Massachusetts Institute for a New Commonwealth.
37.
McDermott, Kathryn. 2001. Understanding variation in state assessment policies. Unpublished paper, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
38.
Meyer, Susan, and Paul Peterson. 1999. Earning and learning: How schools matter. New York: Brookings Institution/Russell Sage.
39.
Meyers, Marcia, Janet Gornick, and Laura Peck. 2001. Packaging support for low-income families: Policy variation across the United States. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management20:457-84.
40.
Miller, Gale. 1991. Enforcing the work ethic: Rhetoric and everyday life in a work incentive program. Albany: State University of New York Press.
41.
Mills, Michael, and Adrienne Hyle. 2001. No rookies on rookies: Compliance and opportunism in policy implementation. Journal of Higher Education72 (4): 351-71.
42.
Mink, Gwendolyn. 1995. The wages of motherhood: Inequality in the welfare state, 1917-1942. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
43.
Peters, Howard A., III. 1999. Policy memorandum re: TANF 60-month limit and post-secondary education. 12 January. Chicago: Illinois Department of Human Services.
44.
———. 2001. Washington community and technical colleges: Academic year report, 00-01. Olympia, WA: State Board for Community and Technical Colleges.
45.
State of Washington, Work First. 2001. Local planning area performance measures report. Olympia, WA: Employment Security Department.
46.
Stein, Sandra. 2001. These are your Title 1 students: Policy language in educational practice. Policy Sciences, 34 (2), 135-56.
47.
Stone, Deborah. 1989. Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Political Science Quarterly, 104:281-300.
48.
Weaver, Kent. 2000. Ending welfare as we know it. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
