Theory and evidence has grown on the role of strategy in public organizations. Miles and Snow suggest that strategy’s impact on organizational success will be greatest when external and internal factors are in alignment—when, for instance, managerial prospectors in decentralized organizations operate in a turbulent environment. This study examines three of the Miles and Snow factors—strategy, structure, and the environment—with an appropriate set of statistical tests in several hundred public organizations over a 6-year period. The results suggest that at least for this set of organizations, the contingency relationships proposed by Miles and Snow do not hold.
AndrewsR.BoyneG. A.LawJ.WalkerR. M. (2005). External constraints on local service standards: The case of comprehensive performance assessment in English local government. Public Administration, 83, 639-656.
2.
AndrewsR.BoyneG. A.WalkerR. M. (2006). Strategy content and organizational performance: An empirical analysis. Public Administration Review, 66, 52-63.
3.
AndrewsR.BoyneG. A.LawJ.WalkerR. M. (2008). Organizational strategy, external regulation and public service performance. Public Administration, 86, 185-203.
4.
Aragon-SanchezA.Sanchez-MarinG. (2005). Strategic orientation, management characteristics, and performance: A study of Spanish SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 43, 287-308.
5.
BifulcoR.LaddH. F. (2006). Institutional change and the coproduction of public services. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 553-576.
6.
BoyneG. A. (2001). Planning, performance and public services. Public Administration, 25, 68-86.
7.
BoyneG. A. (2003). Sources of public service improvement: A critical review and research agenda. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13, 367-394.
8.
BoyneG. A.KitchenerM.KirkpatrickI. (2001). Introduction to the symposium on new labour and the modernization of public management. Public Administration, 80, 179-200.
9.
BoyneG. A.WalkerR. M. (2004). Strategy content and public service organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, 231-252.
10.
BurtlessG. (1996). Does money matter?Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
11.
BrysonJ. M. (2004). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12.
ClaphamD. F. (1984). Rational planning and politics: The example of local authority corporate planning. Policy and Politics, 12, 31-52.
13.
ConantJ.MokwaM.VaradarajanP. (1990). Strategic types distinctive marketing competencies and organizational performance: A multiple-measures-based study. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 365-383.
14.
DavidJ. L. (1989). Synthesis of research on school-based management. Educational Leadership, 46(8), 45-53.
15.
DaviesH.WaltersP. (2004). Emergent patterns of strategy, environment and performance in a transition economy. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 347-64.
16.
DeSarboW. S.Di BenedettoC. A.SongM.SinhaI. (2005). Revising the miles and snow strategic framework: Uncovering interrelationships between strategic types, capabilities, environmental uncertainty, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 47-74.
17.
DonaldsonL. (1995). American anti-management theories of organization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
EhrenbergR. G.ChaykowskiR. P.EhrenbergR. A. (1988). Are school superintendents rewarded for performance? In MonkD. H. (Ed.), Micro-level school finance: Issues and implications for policy (pp. 337-364). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
19.
FernandezS. (2005). Developing and testing an integrative framework of public sector leadership: Evidence from the public education arena. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 197-217.
20.
FiskeE. B. (1996). Decentralization of education: Politics and consensus. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
21.
GoerdelH. T. (2006). Taking initiative: Proactive management in networks and program performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 351-367.
22.
Gonzalez JuenkeE. (2005). Management tenure and network time: How experience affects bureaucratic dynamics. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 113-132.
23.
GreenwoodR. (1987). Managerial strategy in local government. Public Administration, 65, 295-312.
24.
GreenwoodR.HiningsC. R.RansonS. (1975a). Contingency theory and the organization of local authorities: Part I. Differentiation and integration. Public Administration, 63, 1-23.
25.
GreenwoodR.HiningsC. R.RansonS. (1975b). Contingency theory and the organization of local authorities: Part II. Contingencies and structure. Public Administration, 63, 169-190.
26.
HanushekE. (1996). School resources and student performance. In BurtlessG. (Ed.), Does money matter? (pp. 43-73). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
27.
HedgesL. V.GreenwaldR. (1996). Have times changed? The relation between school resources and student performance. In BurtlessG. (Ed.), Does money matter? (pp. 74-92). Washington, DC: Brookings, Institution.
28.
HicklinA. K. (2004). Network stability: Opportunity or obstacle?Public Organization Review, 4, 121-133.
29.
HillG. (2005). The effects of managerial succession on organizational performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 585-597.
30.
JamesW.HattenK. (1994). Evaluating the performance effects of miles and snow’s strategic archetypes in banking, 1983 to 1987: Big or small?Journal of Business Research, 31, 145-154.
31.
JencksC.PhillipsM. (Eds.). (1998). The Black-White test score gap. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
32.
JenningsD.SeamanS. (1994). High and low levels of organizational adaptation: An empirical analysis of strategy, structure, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 459-475.
33.
KruegerA. B. (1999). Experimental estimates of education production functions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 497-532.
34.
MeierK. J.O’TooleL. J.Jr. (2001). Managerial strategies and behavior in networks: A model with evidence from U.S. public education. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11, 271-293.
35.
MeierK. J.O’TooleL. J.Jr. (2002). Public management and organizational performance: The impact of managerial quality. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21, 629-643.
36.
MeierK. J.O’TooleL. J.Jr. (2003). Public management and educational performance: The impact of managerial networking. Public Administration Review, 63, 689-699.
37.
MeierK. J.O’TooleL. J.Jr. (2008). Management theory and Occam’s Razor: How public organizations buffer the environment. Administration & Society, 39, 931-958.
38.
MeierK. J.O’TooleL. J.Jr.BoyneG. A.WalkerR. M. (2007). Strategic management and the performance of public organizations: Testing venerable ideas against recent theories. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 357-377.
39.
MilesR. E.SnowC. C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
40.
MoeT. M. (1994). Integrating politics and organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4, 17-25.
41.
MooreM. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
MooreM. (2005). Towards a confirmatory model of retail strategy types: An empirical test of Miles and Snow. Journal of Business Research, 58, 696-704.
43.
NalbandianJ.KlingnerD. E. (1980). Integrating context and decision strategy: A contingency theory approach to public personnel administration. Administration & Society, 12, 178-202.
44.
NuttP.BackoffR. (1995). Strategy for public and third sector organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3, 209-231.
45.
O’TooleL. J.Jr.MeierK. J. (2003). Plus ça Change: Public management, personnel stability, and organizational performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13, 43-64.
46.
O’TooleL. J.Jr.MeierK. J. (2004). Desperately seeking Selznick: Cooptation and the dark side of public management in networks. Public Administration Review, 64, 681-693.
47.
O’TooleL. J.Jr.MeierK. J.Nicholson-CrottyS. (2005). Managing upward, downward, and outward: Networks, hierarchical relationships, and performance. Public Management Review, 7, 45-68.
48.
OuchiW. G. (2006). Power to the principals: Decentralization in three large school districts. Organization Science, 17, 298-307.
49.
PettigrewA.McKeeL.FerlieE. (1988). Understanding change in the NHS. Public Administration, 66, 297-317.
50.
PittsD. W. (2005). Diversity, representation, and performance: Evidence about race and ethnicity in public organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 615-631.
51.
PorterM. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York, NY: Free Press.
52.
RaineyH. G. (1993). Toward a theory of goal ambiguity in public organizations. In PerryJ. L. (Ed.), Research in public administration (Vol. 2, pp. 121-166). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
53.
RingP. S.PerryJ. L. (1985). Strategic management in public and private organizations: Implications of distinctive contexts and constraints. Academy of Management Review, 10, 276-285.
54.
RattsøJ. (1999). Aggregate local public sector investment and shocks: Norway 1946-1990. Applied Economics, 31, 577-584.
55.
SegevE. (1987). Strategy, strategy-making, and performance in a business game. Strategic Management Journal, 8, 565-577.
56.
SlaterS.OlsonE.HultT. (2006). The moderating influence of strategic orientation on the strategy formation capability-performance relationship. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 1221-1231.
57.
SnowC.HambrickD. (1980). Measuring organizational strategies: Some theoretical and methodological problems. Academy of Management Review, 5, 527-538.
58.
StevensJ.McGowanR. (1983). Managerial strategies in municipal government organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 527-534.
59.
ThompsonF. (1991). Management control and the Pentagon: The organizational strategy-structure mismatch. Public Administration Review, 51, 52-60.
60.
ThompsonJ. R. (2000). Reinvention as reform: Assessing the national performance review. Public Administration Review, 60, 508-550.
61.
ToddP. E.WolpinK. I. (2003). On the specification and estimation of the production function for cognitive achievement. The Economic Journal, 113, F3-F33.
62.
WalkerR. M.EnticottG. (2008). Sustainability, performance and organizational strategy: An empirical analysis of public organizations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17, 79-92.
63.
WechslerB.BackoffR. W. (1987). The dynamics of strategy in public organizations. Journal of the American Planning Association, 53, 34-43.
64.
WenglinskyH. (1997). How educational expenditures improve student performance and how they don’t. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
65.
WilsonJ. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do, and why they do it. New York, NY: Basic Books.
XuS.CavusgilS.WhiteJ. (2006). The impact of strategic fit among strategy, structure and processes on multinational corporation performance: A multimethod assessment. Journal of International Marketing, 14, 1-31.
68.
ZahraS.PearceJ. (1990). Research evidence on the Miles-Snow typology. Journal of Management, 16, 751-768.
