Effects of Information Technology on Policy Decision-Making Processes

Abstract

This study examined the effects of information technology (IT) on policy decision-making processes, especially in the stages of goal setting and choosing among policy alternatives. It used survey data collected in 1998 and 2005 from the metropolitan areas of Seoul and Busan in Korea. The survey results showed that there has been a positive change in the perception of the effects of IT on policy decision-making processes among government users. These changes could be made possible by strong leadership and e-government initiatives in central and metropolitan governments, not just due to the diffusion of technology and technologically capable staff members in organizations. The empirical results also showed that barriers to information sharing had increased in 2005 because of environmental changes, including requirement of authorization for providing information, complicated data management, and negative attitudes to information sharing. It suggests that city governments need to provide policy remedies for overcoming obstacles in information sharing in the areas of protection of privacy, network security, and official authorization processes for providing individual information. This study may contribute to the school of e-government and IT policy research as it helps decrease the gap between theory and practice.

Keywords

information technologies policy decision-making process information sharing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahituv

Igbaria

Sella

(1998). The effects of time pressure and completeness of information on decision making. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(2), 153-172.

Bots

P. W. G.

Lootsma

F. A.

(2000). Editorial: Decision support in the public sector. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 9(1-3), 1-6.

Bozeman

Straussman

J. D.

(1991). Managing information strategically: Public management strategies. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Brudney

Selden

(1995). Adoption of innovation by smaller local governments: The case of computer technology. American Review of Public Administration, 25, 71-86.

Bystrom

(2002). Information and information sources in tasks of varying complexity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 581-591.

Caudle

S. L.

Gorr

W. L.

Newcomer

K. E.

(1991). Key information systems management issues for the public sector. MIS Quarterly, 15, 171-188.

Choudhury

Sampler

(1997). Information specificity and environmental scanning: An economic perspective. MIS Quarterly, 21, 25-43.

Cyr

Gehling

Gibson

(1997). IT power and the postemptive strike. Information Systems Management, 14(3), 7-15.

Dutton

W. H.

Kraemer

K. L.

(1977). “Technology and Urban Management.” Administration and Society, 9(3), 304-340.

10.

Dutton

W. H.

Kraemer

K. L.

(1978). Management Utilization of Computers in American Local Government. Communication of the ACM, 21(3), 206-218.

11.

Dror

(1983). Public policymaking reexamined. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing.

12.

Glaser

Torrance

A. L.

Schwartz

M. H.

(1983). Administrative applications. In Ralston

Reilly

E. D.

(Eds.), Encyclopedia of computer science and engineering (pp. 23-40). New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

13.

Gorry

G. A.

Scott

M. S.

(1971). A framework for management information systems. Sloan Management Review, 13, 64-65.

14.

Harland

(1986). Government is information (but not vice versa). Public Administration Review, 46, 605-607.

15.

Hastak

Mazis

M. B.

Morris

L. A.

(2001). The role of consumer surveys in public policy decision making. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 20, 170-185.

16.

Holden

S. H.

Norris

D. F.

Fletcher

P. D.

(2003). Electronic government at the local level: Progress to date and future issues. Public Performance and Management Review, 26, 1-20.

17.

Huber

G. P.

(1990). A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence, and decision making. Academy of Management Review, 15, 47-70.

18.

John

(2002). Analyzing public policy. London, UK: Continuum.

19.

Korean Association for Local Informatization. (1999-2005). Local informatization evaluation report. Seoul, Korea: Author.

20.

Korean Planning and Budgeting Board. (2007). Public hearings for national finance plan and management: Information policy. Seoul, Korea: Author.

21.

Kraemer

K. L.

(1969). The evolution of information systems for urban administration. Public Administration Review, 29, 389-402.

22.

Kraemer

K. L.

Dedrick

(1994). The payoffs from investment in information technology: Findings from Asia-Pacific countries. World Development, 22, 1921-1931.

23.

Kraemer

K. L.

Gurbaxani

King

J. L.

(1992). Economic development, government policy, and the diffusion of computing in Asia-Pacific countries. Public Administration Review, 52, 146-156.

24.

Landsbergen

Jr. Wolken

Jr. (2001). Realizing the promise: Government information systems and the fourth generation of information technology. Public Administration Review, 61, 206-220.

25.

Limone

Bastias

L. E.

(2006). Autopoiesis and knowledge in the organization: Conceptual foundation for authentic knowledge management. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 23, 39-49.

26.

Maier

Rainer

Snyder

(1997). Environmental scanning for information technology: An empirical investigation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, 177-200.

27.

Martin

L. L.

(1994). A model of impacts of advanced information technologies on organizational knowledge, structure, and performance of professional service firms (working paper). New York, NY: Stern School of Business.

28.

Melville

Kraemer

Gurbaxani

(2004). Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly, 28, 283-322.

29.

Ministry of Government and Home Affairs. (2002). Analysis report on the effectiveness of Si-Gun-Gun public information system projects on local government structure. Seoul, Korea: Author.

30.

Ministry of Government and Home Affairs. (2006). 2004 annual report on the Korean electronic government project. Seoul, Korea: Author.

31.

Moon

M. J.

(2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62, 424-433.

32.

Mostaghimi

(2001). Data collection strategic design in experts-assisted decision making paradigm. Group Decision and Negotiation, 10, 375-388.

33.

National Computerization Agency. (1998). Report on public information resources (NCA IV-RIR-97118). Seoul, Korea: Author.

34.

Norris

D. F.

Demeter

L. A.

(1999). Computing in American city governments. In The 1999 Municipal Yearbook, 10-19. Washington, DC: ICMA.

35.

Norris

D. F.

Kraemer

K. L.

(1996). Mainframe and PC computing in American myths and realities. Public Administration Review, 56, 568-576.

36.

Norris

D. F.

(2003). Leading Edge Information Technologies and American Local Governments. In David Garson

(Ed.), Public Information Technology: Policy and Management Issues (pp.139-169). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishers.

37.

Norris

D. F.

Moon

M. V.

(2005). Advancing e-government at the grassroots: Tortoise or hare? Public Administration Review, 65, 64-75.

38.

Orlikowski

W. J.

(1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3, 399-427.

39.

Perris

(2001). E-governance: Do digital aids make a difference in policy making? In Prins

J. E. J.

(Ed.), Designing e-government: On the crossroads of technological innovation and institutional change. The Hague, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.

40.

Rubin

I. S.

(1990). Budget Theory and Budget Practice: How Good the Fit? Public Administration Review, 50(2), 179-189.

41.

Rupnik

Kukar

Krisper

(2007). Integrating data mining and decision support through data mining based decision support system. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 47(3), 89-104.

42.

Schitekatte

(1996). Facilitating information exchange in small decision-making groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 537-556.

43.

Scott

W. R.

(1992). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (3rd ed.). Englewood, NJ: Prentice Hall.

44.

Simon

H. A.

(1965). The shape of automation for men and automation. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

45.

Simon

H. A.

(1970). Information Storage as a Problem in Organizational Design. In Goldberg Ed., Behavioral Approaches to Modern Management.

46.

Simon

H. A.

(1977). Models of discovery. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel.

47.

Simon

H. A.

Hogarth

Piott

C. R.

Raiffa

Schelling

T. C.

Shepsle

K. A.

. (1986). Decision making and problem solving. Research briefings 1986: Report of the Research Briefing Panel on Decision Making and Problem Solving. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

48.

Snellen

(2005). E-government: A challenge for public management. In Ferlie

Lynn

L. E.

Jr. Pollitt

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management (pp. 398-421). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

49.

Special Committee for E-Government. (2003). E-government White Paper. Seoul, Korea: Author.

50.

Stevens

J. M.

LaPlante

J. M.

(1986). Factors Associated with Financial-Decision Support Systems in State Government: An Empirical Exploration. Public Administration Review, Special Issue, 522-531.

51.

Turban

Meredith

(1994). Fundamentals of management science (6th ed.). Homewood, IL: Irwin.

52.

Van Bruggen

G. H.

Smidts

Wierenga

(1998). Improving decision making by means of a marketing decision support system. Management Science, 44, 645-658.

53.

Vandenbosch

Huff

P. P. L.

(1997). Searching and scanning: How executives obtain information from executive information systems. MIS Quarterly, 21, 81-107.

54.

Walker

W. E.

(2000). Policy analysis: A systematic approach to supporting policymaking in the public sector. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 9(1-3), 11-27.