This article attempts to reconcile the dominant ethical frameworks in public administration: the bureaucratic ethos and the democratic ethos. To do so, the article begins by recasting the debate between the two ethos as a modern-day manifestation of the historic and ongoing debate between utilitarian and deontological ethics. It next shows how the principle of the universalizability of ethical rules can be derived from both utilitarian and deontological theory. Finally, it shows how the principle of universalizability can be used to reconcile the two ethos in the context of the public interest.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Appleby, P. H. (1952). Morality and administration in democratic government. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
2.
Bailey, S. K. (1962). The public interest: Some operational dilemmas. In C. J. Friedrich (Ed.), The public interest: NOMOS V(pp. 96-106). New York: Prentice Hall.
3.
Brady, F. N. (1985). A Janus-headed model of ethical theory: Looking two ways at business/society issues. Academy of Management Review, 10, 568-576.
4.
Brady, F. N., & Woller, G. M. (1996). Administrative ethics and judgments of utility: Reconciling the competing theories. American Review of Public Administration, 26, 309-326.
5.
Braybrooke, D. (1962). The public interest: The present and future concept. In Carl J. Friedrich (Ed.), The public interest: NOMOS V (pp. 129-154). New York: Prentice Hall.
6.
Brownlow, L., Merrian, C., & Gulick, L. (1992). Report of the President's Committee on Administrative Management. In J. M. Shafritz and A. C. Hyde (Eds.), Classics of public administration (pp. 90-95). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
7.
Burke, J. P. (1986). Bureaucratic responsibility. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
8.
Burke, J. P. (1994). Administrative ethics and democratic theory. In T. L. Cooper (Ed.), Handbook of administrative ethics (pp. 457-474). New York: Marcel-Dekker.
9.
Chandler, R. C. (1994). Deontological dimensions of administrative ethics. In T. L. Cooper (Ed.), Handbook of administrative ethics (pp. 147-156). New York: Marcel-Dekker.
10.
Cooper, T. L. (1982). The responsible administrator. Port Washington, NY: Kennikat.
11.
Cooper, T. L. (1987). Hierarchy, virtue, and the practice of public administration: A perspective for normative ethics. Public Administration Review, 47, 320-328.
12.
Denhardt, K. G. (1991). Unearthing the moral foundations of public administration: Honor, benevolence, and justice. In J. S. Bowman (Ed.), Ethical frontiers in public management (pp. 91-113). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13.
Downs, A. (1962). The public interest: Its meaning in a democracy. Social Research, 29, 1-36.
14.
Dvorin, E., & Simmons, R. H. (1972). From amoral to humane bureaucracy. San Francisco: Canfield.
15.
Finer, H. (1941). Administrative responsibility in democratic government. Public Administration Review, 1, 335-350.
16.
Flathman, R. E. (1966). The public interest: An essay concerning the normative discourse. New York: John Wiley.
17.
Fox, C. J. (1989). Free to choose, free to win, free to lose: The phenomenology of ethical space. International Journal of Public Administration, 12, 913-930.
18.
Fox, C. J. (1994). The use of philosophy in administrative ethics. In T. L. Cooper (Ed.), Handbook of administrative ethics (pp. 83-105). New York: Marcel-Dekker.
19.
Frankena, W. K. (1963). Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20.
Frederickson, H. G. (1980). New public administration. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
21.
Frederickson, H. G. (1993). Ethics and public administration: Some assertions. In H. G. Frederickson (Ed.), Ethics and public administration (pp. 243-262). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
22.
Frederickson, H. G., & Hart, D. K. (1987). The public service and the patriotism of benevolence. Public Administration Review, 45, 547-553.
23.
Golembiewski, R. T. (1973). Organization as a moral problem. Public Administration Review, 33, 63-74.
24.
Goodsell, C. T. (1989). Balancing competing values. In J. A. Perry (Ed.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 575-584). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25.
Goodnow, F. J. (1990). Politics and administration: A study in government. New York: Russell & Russell.
26.
Harmon, M. (1969). Administrative policy formulation and the public interest. Public Administration Review, 27, 483-491.
27.
Harmon, M. (1981). Action theory for public administration. New York: Longmans.
28.
Harmon, M. (1995). Responsibility as paradox. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
Harrison, J. (1968). Utilitaranism, universalisation, and our duty to be just In J. J. Thomson & G. Dworkin (Eds.), Ethics (pp. 76-103). New York: Harper & Row.
30.
Hart, D. K. (1974). Social equity, justice, and the equitable administrator. Public Administration Review, 34, 3-11.
31.
Hart, D. K. (1984). The virtuous citizen, the honorable bureaucrat, and "public" administration. Public Administration Review, 44, 111-120.
32.
Hejka-Ekins, A. (1988). Teaching ethics in public administration. Public Administration Review, 48, 885-891.
33.
Hoos, I. (1983). Systems analysis in public policy. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
34.
Lilla, M. T. (1981). Ethos, "ethics," and public service. The Public Interest, 63, 3-17.
35.
Long, N. E. (1990). Conceptual notes on the public interest for public administration and policy analysis. Administration and Society, 22, 170-181.
36.
MacIntyre, A. (1984). After virtue: A study in moral theory. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.
37.
Marini, F. (1971). Toward a new public administration. Scranton, PA: Chandler.
38.
Mitchell, T. R., & Scott, W. G. (1987). Leadership failures, the distrusting public, and prospects of the administrative state. Public Administration Review, 47, 445-452.
39.
Morgan, D. F., & Kass, H. D. (1991). Legitimizing administrative discretion through constitutional stewardship. In J. S. Bowman (Ed.), Ethical frontiers in public management (pp. 286-307). San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
40.
Morrow, A., & Thayer, F. (1978). Materialism and humanism: Organization theory's odd couple. Administration and Society, 10, 86-106.
41.
Mosher, F. (1982). Democracy and the public service. New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
Nagel, T. (1986). The view from nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press.
43.
Nigro, L. G., & Richardson, W. D. (1990). Between citizen and administrator: Administrative ethics and PAR. Public Administration Review, 50, 623-635.
44.
Pops, G. M. (1991). Improving ethical decision making using the concept of justice. In J. S. Bowman (Ed.), Ethical frontiers in public management (pp. 135-157). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
45.
Pops, G. M., & Pavlak, T. J. (1991). The case for justice: Strengthening decision making and policy in public administration. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
46.
Pugh, D. L. (1991). The origins of ethical frameworks in public administration. In J. S. Bowman (Ed.), Ethical frontiers in public management (pp. 9-33). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
47.
Rawls, J. (1968). Two concepts of rules. In J. J. Thomson & G. Dworkin (Eds.), Ethics (pp. 104-135). New York: Harper & Row.
48.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
49.
Redford, E. (1969). Democracy and the administrative state. New York: Oxford University Press.
50.
Rohr, J. A. (1986). To run a constitution: The legitimacy of the administrative state. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
51.
Sayre, K., Maher, E. L., Arnold, P. E., Goodpaster, K. E., Rodes, R. E., & Steward, J. B. (1980). Regulation, values, and the public interest. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
52.
Schubert, G. (1960). The public interest: A critique of the theory of a political concept. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
53.
Schubert, G. (1962). Is there a public interest theory? In C. J. Friedrich (Ed.), The public interest: NOMOS V(pp. 162-176). New York: Prentice Hall.
54.
Simon, H. A. (1976). Administrative behavior (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
55.
Smart, J.J.C. (1968). Extreme and restricted utilitarianism. In J. J. Thomson & G. Dworkin (Eds.), Ethics (pp. 136-150). New York: Harper & Row.
56.
Sorauf, F. J. (1957). The public interest reconsidered. Journal of Politics, 14, 616-639.
57.
Sorauf, F. J. (1962). The conceptual muddle. In C. J. Friedrich (Ed.), The public interest: NOMOS V(pp. 183-190). New York: Prentice Hall.
58.
Taylor, F. W. (1967). The principles of scientific management. New York: Norton.
59.
Thompson, D. F. (1983). Bureaucracy and democracy. In G. Duncan (Ed.), Democratic theory and practice (pp. 235-250). New York: Cambridge University Press.
60.
Thompson, D. F. (1987). Political ethics and public office. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61.
Thompson, V. (1975). Without sympathy or enthusiasm. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
62.
Ventriss, C., & Luke J. S. (1988). Organizational learning and public policy. American Review of Public Administration, 18, 337-357.
63.
Waldo, D. (1980). The enterprise of public administration. Novato, CA: Chandler and Sharp.
64.
Wall, B. (1991). Assessing ethics theories from a democratic viewpoint. In J. S. Bowman (Ed.), Ethical frontiers in public management (pp. 135-157). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
65.
Wamsley, G. L. (1990). The agency perspective: Public administrators as agential leaders. In G. L. Wamsley, R. N. Bacher, C. T. Goodsell, P. S. Kronenberg, J. A. Rohr, C. M. Stivers, O. F White, & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding public administration (pp. 114-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
66.
Wamsley G. L., Goodsell, C. T., Rohr, J. A., Stivers, C. M., White, O. F., & Wolf, J. F. (1990). Public administration and the governance process: Shifting the political dialogue. In G. L. Wamsley, R. N. Bacher, C. T. Goodsell, P. S. Kronenberg, J. A. Rohr, C. M. Stivers, O. F. White, & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding public administration (pp. 31-51). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
67.
Warren, K. F. (1993). We have debated ad nauseam the legitimacy of the administrative state—But why?Public Administration Review, 53, 249-254.
68.
Warwick, D. P. (1981). The ethics of administrative discretion. In J. L. Fleishman, L. Liebman, & M. Moore (Eds.), Public duties: The moral obligations of government officials (pp. 93-127). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
69.
Weber, M. (1958). Politics as a vocation. In H. H. Gerth & C. W. Mills (Eds. & Trans.), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (pp. 77-128). New York: Oxford University Press.
70.
Wilson, J. Q. (1993). The moral sense. New York: Free Press.
71.
Wilson, W. (1992). The study of administration. In J. M. Shafritz & A. C. Hyde (Eds.), Classics of public administration (pp. 11-24). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
