Evolutionary Theory and African American Self-Perception: Sex Differences in Body-Esteem Predictors of Self-Perceived Physical and Sexual Attractiveness,and Self-Esteem
Restricted accessOtherFirst published online May, 2003
Evolutionary Theory and African American Self-Perception: Sex Differences in Body-Esteem Predictors of Self-Perceived Physical and Sexual Attractiveness,and Self-Esteem
Evolutionary biological theory has been shown to be relevant to an understanding of how individuals assess others' physical and sexual attractiveness. This research used the Body-Esteem Scale and multiple regression to determine if this theory is also relevant to an understanding of self-perceived physical and sexual attractiveness and self-esteem for a sample of 91 African Americans. The hypotheses that regression models of physical and sexual attractiveness would differ within and across sex groups and that models of self-esteem would differ across sex groups in accordance with evolutionary theory were supported. Attributes of the body related to fecundity and successful mothering characteristics predicted for women and attributes of the body related to strength and dominance predicted for men. In addition, attributes of the body dealing with sexual maturity were stronger predictors of sexual attractiveness for women. This research indicates that evolutionary biological theory can provide relevant insight for an understanding of self-perceived attractiveness and self-esteem for African Americans.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bailey, J.M., Gaulin, S., Agyei, Y., & Gladue, B. A. (1994). Effects of gender and sexual orientation on evolutionary relevant aspects of human mating psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1081-1093.
2.
Barkow, J. H. (1978). Social norms, the self, and sociobiology: Building on the ideas of A. I. Hallowell. Current Anthropology, 19(1), 99-103.
3.
Björntorp, P. (1987). Fat cell distribution and metabolism. In R. J. Wurtman (Ed.), Human obesity (pp. 66-72). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
4.
Björntorp, P. (1988). The associations between obesity, adipose tissue distribution and disease. Acta Medica Scandavica, 723(Supplement), 121-134.
5.
Booth, A., & Dabbs, J.M., Jr. (1993). Testosterone and men's marriages. Social Forces, 72, 463-477.
6.
Buss, D. M. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 616-628.
7.
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.
8.
Buss, D. M. (1995). Psychological sex differences: Origins through sexual selection. American Psychologist, 50(3), 164-168.
9.
Buss, D. M., & Dedden, L. A. (1990). Derogation of competitors. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 395-422.
10.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: A contextual evolutionary analysis of human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232.
11.
Crawford, C. B., & Anderson, J. L. (1989). Sociobiology: An environmental discipline? American Psychologist, 44, 1449-1459.
12.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
13.
Cunningham, M. R. (1986). Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: Quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 925-935.
14.
Cunningham, M. R., Barbee, A., & Pike, C. (1990). What do women want? Facialmetric assessments of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 61-72.
15.
Cunningham, M. R., Roberts, A. R., Barbee, A. P., Druen, P. B., & Wu, C.-H. (1995). “Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours”: Consistency and variability in the cross cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 261-279.
16.
Ehrenkantz, J., Bliss, E., & Sheard, M. H. (1974). Plasma testosterone: Correlation with aggressive behavior and social dominance in man. Psychomatic Medicine, 36, 469-475.
17.
Enlow, D. H. (1990). Faces. In D. H. Enlow (Ed.), Facial growth (3rd ed., pp. 1-24). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
18.
Folstad, I., & Karter, A. J. (1992). Parasites, bright males and the immunocompetence handicap. American Naturalist, 139, 603-622.
19.
Franzoi, S. L. (1995). Social psychology. Chicago, IL: Brown & Benchmark.
20.
Franzoi, S. L., & Herzog, M. E. (1986). The body esteem scale: A convergent and discriminant validity study. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 24-31.
21.
Franzoi, S. L., & Shields, S. A. (1984). The Body-Esteem Scale: Multidimensional structure and sex differences in a college population. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 173-178.
22.
Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Yeo, R. A. (1994). Facial attractiveness, developmental stability and fluctuating asymmetry. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 73-85.
23.
Gladue, B. A., Boechler, M., & McCaul, K. D. (1989). Hormonal response to competition in human males. Aggressive Behavior, 15, 409-422.
24.
Henss, R. (1992). “Spieglein, spieglein an der wand...” Geschlecht, alter, und physische attraktivitat [“Mirror, mirror on the wall...” Sex, age, and physical attractiveness]. Weinhem, Germany: Psychologie Verlags Union.
25.
Henss, R. (1995). Waist to hip ratio and attractiveness. Replication and extension. Personality and Individual Differences, 19(4), 479-488.
26.
Horvath, T. (1979). Correlates of physical beauty in men and women. Social Behavior and Personality, 7, 145-151.
27.
Horvath, T. (1981). Physical attractiveness: The influence of selected torso parameters. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 10, 21-24.
28.
Iwasa, Y., Promiankowski, A., & Nee, S. (1991). The evolution of costly mate preferences, II: The handicap principle. Evolution, 45, 1431-1442.
29.
Johnston, V. S., & Franklin, M. (1993). Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 183-199.
30.
Kenrick, D. T. (1987). Gender, genes and the environment: A biosocial interactionist perspective. In P. Shaver & C. Hendrick (Eds.), Sex and gender (pp. 14-43). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31.
Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 75-133.
32.
Kenrick, D. T., Neuberg, S. L., Zierk, K. L., & Krones, J. M. (1994). Evolution and social cognition: Contrast effects as a function of sex, dominance, and physical attractiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(2), 210-217.
33.
Lerner, R. M., Karabenick, S. A., & Stuart, J. L. (1973). Relations among physical attractiveness, body attitudes, and self-concept in male and female college students. Journal of Psychology, 85, 119-129.
34.
Mazur, A., Halpern, R., & Udry, R. (1994). Dominant looking males copulate earlier. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 87-94.
35.
Mintz, L. B., & Betz, N. E. (1986). Sex differences in the nature, realism, and correlates of bodyimage. Sex Roles, 15, 185-195.
36.
Neal, A. M., & Wilson, M. L. (1989). The role of skin color and features in the Black community: Implications for Black women and therapy. Clinical Psychology Review, 9, 323-333.
37.
Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction (2nd ed.). New York: CBS College Publishing.
38.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39.
Rosenberg, M. (1986). Self-concept from middle childhood through adolescence. In J. Suls & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on self (pp. 107-136). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40.
Sadalla, E. K., Kenrick, D. T., & Vershure, B. (1987). Dominance and heterosexual attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(4), 730-738.
41.
Sandler, K. (Producer/Director). (1992). A question of color [Film]. San Francisco: California Newsreel.
42.
SAS Institute, Inc. (1988). SAS/STAT user's guide, release 6.03 edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.
43.
Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (1996). Strategic self-promotion and competitor derogation: Sex and context effects on the perceived effectiveness of mate attraction tactics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1185-1204.
44.
Sherwood, L. (1989). Human physiology: From cells to systems. St. Paul, MN: West.
45.
Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 293-307.
46.
Singh, D. (1994). Is thin really beautiful and good? Relationship between waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and female attractiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 16(1), 123-132.
47.
Singh, D. (1995a). Female judgment of male attractiveness and desirability for relationships: Role of waist-to-hip ratio and financial status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), 1089-1101.
48.
Singh, D. (1995b). Female health, attractiveness, and desirability for relationship: Role of breast asymmetry and waist-to-hip ratio. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 465-481.
49.
Singh, D., & Luis, S. (1995). Ethnic and gender consensus for the effect of waist-to-hip ratio on judgments of women's attractiveness. Human Nature, 6, 51-65.
50.
Singh, D., & Young, R. K. (1995). Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breasts and hips: Role in judgments of female attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 483-507.
51.
Smith, L., Burlew, A., & Lundgren, D. (1991). Black consciousness, self-esteem, and satisfaction with physical appearance among African-American female college students. Journal of Black Studies, 20(1), 62-74.
52.
Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.
53.
Symons, D. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerton (Eds.), Sexual nature/sexual culture (pp. 80-118). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54.
Tashakkori, A., & Thompson, V. (1989). Gender, self-perception, and self-devaluation in depression: A factor analytic study among Iranian college students. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 341-354.
55.
Thomas, C. D., & Freeman, R. J. (1990). The Body-Esteem Scale: Construct validity of the female subscales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 54, 204-212.
56.
Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871-1971 (pp. 136-179). Chicago: Aldine.
57.
Udry, J. R., & Billy, J.O.G. (1987). Initiation of coitus in early adolescence. American Sociological Review, 52, 841-855.
58.
Wade, T.J. (1996). The relationships between skin color and self-perceived global, physical, and sexual attractiveness, and self-esteem for African Americans. Journal of Black Psychology, 22(3), 358-373.
59.
Wade, T.J. (1998). Race and evolutionary theory: Differences in models of self-perceived physical attractiveness for Blacks and Whites. Unpublished manuscript.
60.
Wade, T. J. (2000). Evolutionary theory and self-perception: Sex differences in body-esteem predictors of self-perceived physical and sexual attractiveness and self-esteem. International Journal of Psychology, 35(1), 36-45.
61.
Wade, T.J., & Abetz, H. (1997). Social cognition and evolutionary psychology: Physical attractiveness and contrast effects on women's self-perceived body image. International Journal of Psychology, 32(1), 35-42.
62.
Wade, T. J., Thompson, V., Tashakkori, A., & Valente, E. (1989). A longitudinal analysis of sex by race differences in predictors of adolescent self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences, 10(7), 717-729.
63.
Wendel, G., & Lester, D. (1988). Body-cathexis and self-esteem. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 67, 538.
64.
Wiggins, J. S., Wiggins, N., & Conger, J. C. (1968). Correlates of heterosexual somatic preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 82-90.
65.
Zuk, M. (1990). Reproductive strategies and disease susceptibility: An evolutionary viewpoint. Parasitology Today, 6, 231-233.
