Many explanations have been made about the differential secondary school drop-out rates, college attendance levels, and over-all academic performance discrepancies of Black and White students. This article presents a model to describe the difference between the two groups in academic ascendancy based on the Cultural-Distance Hypothesis formulated by Grubb (1983). Basically the poorer Black performance in the formal educational system can be blamed on the need for African American (and especially poor) children to learn a group of functional behaviors related to community survival but unrelated to academic advancement. Euro-American children are spared these responsibilities and their mastery until later in life, usually post high school or college. Blacks and other groups described as "deprived" are therefore seen as having to learn a great many "adult" behaviors at an earlier age than do their White or "privileged" counterparts. This competition for their learning potential during the formative school years can be seen as the cause for lower school performance and higher dropout rates.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Albee, G. W.
, Back, K. W., Carter, L. F., Chin, R., Clark, K. B., Deutsch, M., Gamson, W. A., Gerrard, H. B., Hammond, K. R., Hefner, R., Hollander, E. P., White, R. K., & Zimbardo, P. G. (For the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues). (1969). The SPSSI statement. Harvard Educational Review, 39, 625-627.
2.
Arinoldo, C. G.
(1981). Black-white differences in the general cognitive index of the McCarthy scales and in the full scale IQ's of Wechsler's scales. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37(3), 630-638.
3.
Bernstein, G. S.
(1982). Training behavior change agents: A conceptual review. Behavior Therapy, 13, 1-23.
4.
Coleman, J. S.
(1961). The adolescent society. Glenco, IL: Free Press.
5.
De Filippis, N. A.
, & McCampbell, E. (1979). Booklet Categories Test. Odessa, F1: Psychological Assessment Resource.
6.
Grubb, H. J. (1983). The cultural-distance perspective:An exploratory analysis of its effects on learning and intelligence. Unpublished Masters Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University.
7.
Grubb, H. J. (1985). Intellectual assessment and prediction: An analysis of cultural involvement based on the cultural-distance hypothesis. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University.
8.
Grubb, H. J.
(1987). Intelligence at the low end of the curve: Where are the racial differences?The Journal of Black Psychology, 14(1), 25-34.
9.
Grubb, H. J.
, & Ollendick, T. H. (1986). The culture-distance perspective: An exploratory analysis of its effect on learning and intelligence. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10(4), 399-414.
10.
Hays, J. R.
, & Smith, A. L. (1980). Comparison of WISC-R and culture fair intelligence test scores for three ethnic groups of juvenile delinquents. Psychological Reports, 46, 931-934.
11.
Hedgpeth, W. D. (1981). A comparison among students' extracurricular involvement, school attendance, grade point average, and other selected variables as measured in four large urban high schools in Texas. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, East Texas State University.
12.
Jensen, A. R.
(1969). How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement?Harvard Educational Review, 39(1), 1-123.
13.
Jensen, A. R.
(1977). An examination of cultural bias in the Wonderlic Personal Test. Intelligence, 1, 51-64.
14.
Jensen, A. R.
(1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: The Free Press.
15.
Jensen, A. R.
, & Inouye, A. R. (1980). Level I and Level II abilities in Asian, White, and Black Children. Intelligence, 4, 41-49.
16.
Jones, R. S.
(1971). The sociology of knowledge: Proving blacks inferior, 1870-1930. Black World, February, pp. 4-19.
17.
Knapp, P. A.
, & Seagrim, G. N. (1981). Visual memory in Australian aboriginal children and children of European descent. International Journal of Psychology, 16, 213-231.
18.
Lemkan, P. V.
, & Imre, D. P. (1969). Results of a field epidemiologic study. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 73, 858-863.
19.
MacKenzie, B.
(1984). Explaining race differences in IQ: The logic, the methodology, and the evidence. The American Psychologist, 39(11), 1214-1233.
20.
McShane, D. A.
, & Plas, J. M. (1982). Wechsler scale performance patterns of American Indian children. Psychology in the Schools, 19, 8-17.
21.
Minturn, L.
(1983, September). Ethnocentrism in cross-cultural research: And what to do about it. Society for Cross-Cultural Research Newsletter, 11 (1), 5-8.
22.
Mohs, M.
(1982). IQ: New research shows that the Japanese outperform all others in intelligence tests. Are they really smarter?Discover, 18-14.
23.
Morse, J.
(1914). Comparison of white and colored children measured by the Binet scale of intelligence. Popular Science Monthly, 5, 384-389.
24.
Phillips, I.
, & Williams, N. (1975). Psychopathology and mental retardation: A study of 100 mentally retarded children. I. Psychopathology. American Journal of Psychiatry, 132, 1265-1271.
25.
Rockwell, T. A. (1983). The relationship of maternal employment to academic achievement among high school sophomores and seniors. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Akron.
26.
Samuda, R. J.
(1975). Psychological testing of American minorities: Issues and consequences. New York: Dodd, Mead, & Co.
27.
Schill, W. J.
, McCartin, R., Meyer, K. (1985). Youth employment: Its relationship to academic and family variables. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 26, 155-163.
28.
Taylor, H. F.
(1976). IQ heritability: A checklist of methodological fallacies. The Journal of Afro-American Issues, 4(1), 35-49.
29.
Weiner, I. B.
(1982). Child and adolescentpsychopathology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
30.
Williams, R. L.
(1972, September). Problems of match and mismatch in testing Black children. In D. Price-Williams (Chair), Research in Ethnic Communities: Problems and Progress. Symposium presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Honolulu, Hawaii.
31.
Wright, B. J.
, & Isenstein, V. (1975). One man's solution-a new approach. In U.S. National Institute of Mental Health, Psychological Tests and Minorities. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
