Abstract
The authors conducted citation analyses to identify the most influential articles published in Teaching of Psychology. Using the Web of Science and PsycINFO databases, we gathered citation counts for the 2,986 articles appearing in the journal from 1974 through 2011 and then used these counts to compile a Top 20 list for total citations, an index that favors older articles, and another list for average number of citations per year, which favors more recent articles. We discuss the nature and content of the articles comprising the two lists as well as possible explanations for their impact. We conclude that although the journal has a history of low impact factors, some articles, especially large survey articles, have been very influential.
Keywords
The history of the Teaching of Psychology (ToP) has been detailed in a series of articles starting with Robert S. Daniel’s editorial statement in the first issue of ToP (Daniel, 1974). Daniel compared ToP’s progression from a newsletter to a journal to the developmental sequence of germination to neonate. Charles L. Brewer (1985) extended Daniel’s metaphor when he became editor by noting that ToP was approaching adolescence and striving toward maturity. Daniel (1992) detailed ToP’s history through the beginning of young adulthood. To honor ToP on its silver anniversary and to follow it on into adulthood, Griggs, Jackson, Christopher, and Marek (1999) extended these prior ToP overviews of its development and growth into the late 1990s. Griggs et al. provided contributor analyses for ToP’s entire history and a content analysis of issues published between 1991 and 1998 and detailed the personnel and journal organization changes for these 8 years. To honor ToP on its 40th anniversary, Griggs and Collisson (2013) updated Griggs et al.’s analyses and journal history through mid-2012. In addition, Tomcho et al. (2008) content analyzed the teaching activities reported in the first 33 years of ToP, 1974–2006. Thus, ToP’s early history and subsequent development have been fairly well documented.
One aspect of ToP’s history that has been completely ignored, however, is identifying which of the 2,986 research articles published in ToP from 1974 through 2011 have had the greatest scientific impact on teaching research as measured by citation frequency. The purpose of the present study is to remedy this situation. The use of citation counts as a measure of scientific impact is well established (Nosek et al., 2010), and there have been several recent citation analyses of journal articles in other areas of psychology: health (Frosch et al., 2010), intelligence (Wicherts, 2009), pediatric psychology (Aylward, Roberts, Colombo, & Steele, 2007), school psychology (Price, Floyd, Fagan, & Smithson, 2011), and social (Haslam & Coval, 2010). A citation analysis of ToP articles should prove especially intriguing because ToP has traditionally had high rejection rates but low impact factors. For example, for the 3 years 2008 through 2010, the rejection rates were 89%, 88%, and 80%, respectively, and the yearly impact factors were 0.29, 0.40, and 0.33, respectively. 1
To put ToP’s 2010 impact factor (0.33) into perspective, the average impact factor for the other 46 APA journals with 2010 impact factor data available was 2.87. 2 ToP had the lowest impact factor of all 47 APA journals for 2010; the highest impact factor, 11.98, was for Psychological Bulletin. To better grasp these impact data, an understanding of the impact factor and how it is computed is necessary. The impact factor is a measure reflecting the average number of citations to recent articles published in a journal. In a given year, the impact factor of a journal is the average number of citations received per paper published in that journal during the two preceding years (Garfield, 1972). Thus, ToP’s 2010 impact factor of 0.33 means that in 2010 the average number of citations received per paper published in 2009 and 2008 was 0.33.
ToP’s high rejection rates and its low impact factors seem contradictory. Citation impact is positively correlated with rejection rate (Buffardi & Nichols, 1981). High rejection rates would seem to indicate higher quality articles that should garner more attention, inspire more future research, and thus lead to higher citation rates. So what is going on here? One possible explanation involves journals dedicated to largely self-contained research areas. When a journal publishes specialized content and it is the only journal in its field that does so, the overall opportunities for citation are lessened, thereby leading on average to a lower impact factor. ToP is such a journal. It is psychology’s only journal devoted to teaching research so opportunities for citation of its articles are limited. Other examples of APA journals with comparable specialized content are Psychoanalytic Psychology and Military Psychology, and both of these tend to have low impact factors. For example, the 2010 impact factors for these two journals were 0.43 and 0.60, respectively.
Although ToP’s specialized content may or may not be the source for its history of low impact factors, it does not change the fact that ToP’s impact factors are low. ToP’s low impact factors mean that its articles on average are not cited very often, at least not in the short term. It is worth noting that a journal’s overall impact factor may be an unreliable guide to the citation impact of its individual articles because the impact factor is an index of the journal’s aggregate citation impact only (Haslam & Coval, 2010). Thus, given that almost 3,000 articles have been published in ToP since 1974, it is very likely that some of these articles have high citation rates. The main purpose of this study is to identify and examine these highly cited ToP articles, those that have had the most impact.
Whereas an article’s impact can be conceived of in many different ways, both subjective and objective (Sternberg & Gordeeva, 1996), citation analysis is clearly an appropriate objective index of the scientific impact of a journal article on the accumulation of knowledge and one that has been used often (Nosek et al., 2010; Price, Floyd, Fagan, & Smithson, 2011; White & White, 1977). Two common metrics of impact using citation analysis are the total number of citations and the average number of citations per year that an article has generated. Both are useful because the age of an article differentially influences the two measures. Older articles tend to have higher citation counts than recently published articles because older articles simply have a greater amount of time to generate citations than recently published articles. The average number of citations per year is a better metric for recently published articles, but it can be biased against older articles if citations drop off over extended time.
Because of this confounding by age, we chose to use both indexes to identify the ToP articles that have had the most impact over the past four decades. We compiled two Top 20 lists of articles, one for each citation index. In addition to identifying these articles that have had the greatest impact, we discuss their nature and possible explanations for their impact, especially for those articles that appear on both Top 20 lists. These findings should enable a greater understanding of the impact of different research methods and topics, providing guidance for authors, editors, and the journal readership.
Method
Sources of Citation Data
Like other recent citation analyses of psychology journals (Aylward et al., 2007; Frosch et al., 2010; Haslam & Coval, 2010; Price et al., 2011; Wicherts, 2009), we used the Institute for Scientific Information’s Web of Science (WoS) as our primary source for citation data. WoS is a widely used database that tracks the citations of peer-reviewed articles published in scientific journals, but WoS citation data are only available for ToP starting in 1975. This was problematic for the present study because 18 articles were published during ToP’s first half-year of publication in 1974 and these articles could be among the most cited ones given the many years possible for them to gather citations. Therefore, we obtained citation data for these 18 articles from PsycINFO. Unlike WoS, PsycINFO does not provide yearly citation counts for articles, but it does provide the total number of citations for an article since publication, which is sufficient for our purposes in checking citation counts for the 1974 articles.
Procedure
First, we extracted citation data from the WoS’s Social Science Citation Index (http://isiknowledge.com/wos/; retrieved March 12, 2012) for journal articles published in ToP between 1975 and 2011. Data retrieved from the WoS database included author information, year of publication, and the number of times each article was cited each year from 1975 through 2011. We then calculated the total number of citations and the average number of citations per year for each article. In making these latter calculations, we included the year that an article was published in the average citation per year index because it is possible for articles to generate citations during their first year of publication. We also computed each article’s recent impact by calculating the total number of citations and the average number of citations generated per year within the past 5 (2007–2011) and 10 (2002–2011) years.
We then rank ordered every ToP article published from 1975 to 2011 by the total number of citations that it has received and assigned the same rank to articles with identical total numbers of citations. We identified the Top 20 articles, and to put the data for these articles into perspective, we created a frequency distribution for total number of citations, using intervals of five citations, for the entire set of articles published in ToP from 1975 to 2011. We also calculated the mean, median, and range for the total citations data for the Top 20 articles and for the entire set of articles.
Next, we rank ordered the entire set of ToP articles by average number of citations per year and created a second Top 20 list with respect to these averages. To put these data into perspective, we created a frequency distribution for average number of citations per year, grouping articles by 0.50 citations per year. We also calculated the mean, median, and range for the average number of citations per year data for the Top 20 articles and for the entire set of articles.
To compare the two Top 20 lists with respect to age, we first computed the ages (years since publication) for the articles on each list and then calculated the mean, median, and range for the distribution of ages for each list. We also noted the number of articles on each list in each decade from the 1970s to the 2000s. To determine whether longer articles tended to be cited more, we created a frequency distribution of the number of articles from both lists that were Topical Articles (previously called Articles, Short Articles [not shorter in length but narrower in focus], and General Articles) which are 2,500 to 7,000 words in length, Faculty Forum articles that are typically 1,200 words or less, and Methods and Techniques articles which are typically 1,000 to 2,000 words. 3 Because of their nature and length, articles from the Technology and Teaching (formerly Computers in Teaching) section and all but one of the articles from Special Issues of the journal were classified as Topical Articles.
Finally, we located each of the 18 articles published in ToP in 1974 within PsycINFO (http://psycnet.apa.org/; retrieved March 17, 2012). We recorded the total number of citations each article has generated and used these data to calculate the average number of citations per year for each article. Most of the 1974 articles had both low total citation counts (12 were 0 or 1 and only 2 were greater than 4) and low average numbers of citations per year ranging from 0 to 0.50. The most highly cited article (Kulik & Kulik, 1974) would not have made the top 50 on either ranking list. Therefore, we only present the results from the 1975 to 2011 ToP citation data set retrieved from WoS.
Results and Discussion
We first report and discuss the main results for both citation indexes—total number of citations and average number of citations per year. Next, we discuss the content and impact of the articles that made either or both of the Top 20 lists. We structured this discussion with respect to article content, using 15 topic categories. Additional results are incorporated within this discussion where relevant.
Main Results
Table 1 provides the data for the Top 20 most frequently cited ToP articles with respect to total number of citations. The mean and median total citations are 35.80 and 30.00, respectively, with a range of 25 to 107 citations. In comparison, the mean and median total citations for the entire set of ToP articles (1975–2011) are only 3.85 and 2.00, respectively, with a range of 0 to 107. Table 2 gives the frequency distribution for the entire set of articles with respect to total citations. As Table 2 shows, most articles have very few citations; 71.13% have less than five citations. We looked more closely at those that have less than five and found that 1,165 articles (39.21%) either have no citations (644 articles) or only one citation (521 articles). These frequency distribution data are not only congruent with ToP’s history of low impact factors but also make it clear that the total citation numbers for the Top 20 articles are far greater than the norm for ToP articles.
Top 20 Most Frequently Cited Teaching of Psychology Articles With Respect to Total Number of Citations.
aWe collected the data for total citations for the period 1975 through 2011 from Web of Science, via apps.isiknowledge.com, on March 12, 2012.
bThis article also appears on the Top 20 list for average citations per year (see Table 3).
Frequency of Teaching of Psychology Articles With Respect to Total Number of Citations.
aWe collected the data for total citations for the period 1975 through 2011 from Web of Science, via apps.isiknowledge.com, on March 12, 2012.
Table 3 provides data for the Top 20 most frequently cited ToP articles with respect to the average number of citations per year since publication. The mean and median average numbers of citations per year for these 20 articles are 2.71 and 2.46, respectively, with a range of 0 to 5.35. Compare these statistics with those for the entire set of ToP articles—mean and median average numbers of citations per year = 0.22 and 0.11, respectively, with a range of 0 to 5.35. Table 4 gives the frequency distribution for the entire set of articles with respect to average citations per year. More than 87% of the articles have an average citation rate less than 0.50. As with the frequency distribution data for total citations, these frequency distribution data for average citations are both consistent with ToP’s history of low impact factors and clearly show that the citation averages for the Top 20 articles for average citations per year are far above the norm.
Top 20 Most Frequently Cited Teaching of Psychology Articles With Respect to Average Citations per Year Since Publication.
aWe collected the data for total citations for the period 1975 through 2011 from Web of Science, via apps.isiknowledge.com, on March 12, 2012, and used these data to calculate the average number of citations per year for each article.
bThis article also appears on the Top 20 list for total citations (see Table 1).
Frequency of Teaching of Psychology Articles With Respect to Average Number of Citations per Year Since Publication.
aWe collected the frequency data for total citations for the period from 1975 through 2011 from Web of Science, via apps.isiknowledge.com, on March 12, 2012, and used these data to calculate the average number of citations per year for each article.
Age of Articles
Only one of the Top 20 total citations articles is from the 1970s, five are from the 1980s, 12 are from the 1990s, and two are from the 2000s. The mean and median ages are 20.55 and 20.50 years, respectively, with a range of 7 to 35 years. These articles are older than those on the average citations Top 20 list. The mean and median ages of these latter articles are only 9.65 and 8.50, respectively, with a range of 3 to 26 years. Also, in contrast with the articles on the total citations list, none are from the 1970s, only one from the 1980s, five from the 1990s, and 14 from the 2000s. Whereas only 10% of the articles on the total citations list are from the 2000s, 70% of the articles on the average citations list are. The age biases for the two indexes are also demonstrated by the fact that 13 (65%) of the 20 articles on the average citations list have received 100% of their citations in the last 10 years, but this is only true for one (5%) of the 20 articles on the total citations list.
The differing impact of age on the two lists was expected because older articles have the advantage in compiling total citations given their longer lives, but recent articles have the advantage in computing average citations per year given their shorter lives. Even though these age biases work to minimize overlap between the two Top 20 lists, there is surprising commonality between the lists with 40% (8) of the 20 articles on each list also appearing on the other list. Being on both lists is quite a feat for an article. This means that the article is both cited frequently and typically cited frequently over a substantial period of time.
Length of Articles
Because longer articles have been found to receive more citations (Frosch et al., 2010; Seglen, 1997), we expected that of the 32 articles on one or both lists, most would be the longer, more substantial articles that are now termed Topical Articles, and this was the case. Twenty-four of the 32 articles (75%) are Topical Articles, 6 (19%) are Faculty Forum articles, and only 2 (6%) are Methods and Techniques articles. All of the articles that appear on both lists are what we have classified as Topical Articles.
Content and Impact of Articles
We first discuss the content and impact of the eight articles appearing on both lists, incorporating discussion of any related articles from either of the lists. We then discuss the remaining articles, grouping them together in as few topic categories as possible.
Academic Dishonesty
The most cited article for both indexes, Davis, Grover, Becker, and McGregor (1992), reported the findings for a large survey study on academic dishonesty. Davis et al. has 107 total citations and a citation yearly average of 5.35 citations. Although this article is 20 years old, it continues to be cited frequently. For example, it had 15 citations in 2009 alone, the most for any ToP article in 1 year and greater than the total number of citations ever for 95.93% of the entire set of articles published in ToP (1975–2011).
Why has the Davis et al. (1992) article been cited so often? Whereas some articles on “cheating” had been published in ToP prior to the Davis et al. article (e.g., Bellezza & Bellezza, 1989), these articles only dealt with very specific aspects of cheating, such as using crib notes or copying on multiple choice tests. The Davis et al. article, however, reported the findings of a seminal, large survey study involving more than 6,000 students regarding the prevalence, causes, techniques, faculty and institutional responsibility, deterrent measures, and punishment dimensions of academic dishonesty. To the best of our knowledge, no one had done a survey study of this scale and scope previously, or has done one subsequently. Given that academic dishonesty was and continues to be a perennial problem in higher education, Davis et al.’s thorough study of this problem is likely the major reason for this article’s great impact. Interestingly, Davis and Ludvigson (1995) provided some additional data from 2,153 upper division undergraduate students regarding the frequency of cheating, reasons for cheating, and influence of penalties on cheating and a proposal for remediation of academic dishonesty. This later article has also been cited frequently but not nearly as often as the earlier one. It was tied for 32nd in total citations with 22 and was 51st in average citations per year with an average of 1.29.
Given the impact of Davis et al. (1992), academic dishonesty seems to be a topic of much interest to the teaching research community. However, Davis et al. is the only article on either Top 20 list that deals with academic dishonesty. The remaining seven articles that appear on both lists are concerned with five other important topics (mentor–student relationships in psychology graduate programs, the undergraduate psychology curriculum, introductory psychology textbooks, critical thinking, and active learning), and five of these seven articles report the findings of large surveys like the one reported by Davis et al.
Mentor–Student Relationships
Cronan-Hillix, Gensheimer, Cronan-Hillix, and Davidson (1986) and Clark, Harden, and Johnson (2000) reported findings for surveys examining mentor–student relationships in psychology graduate training, a topic for which little empirical data existed at the time of either study. Cronan-Hillix et al. surveyed 90 graduate students and reported findings on the prevalence and role of mentors and the personality characteristics and functions of mentors from the viewpoint of students. Similarly, Clark et al. reported the survey findings for nearly 800 graduate student respondents in clinical doctoral programs (both PhD and PsyD programs) on the prevalence of mentor relationships, personality characteristics of mentors, the functions of mentoring, and the evaluation and importance of the mentoring relationship. Although neither of these studies is recent, both continue to be frequently cited because of the scarcity of large-scale, survey data on this critical topic of graduate student mentoring. For example, Clark et al. was cited 11 times in 2011.
Undergraduate Psychology Curriculum
The two articles by Perlman and McCann (1999a, 1999b) address another important issue—the undergraduate psychology curriculum; and like the three articles already discussed, both report findings from large survey studies. Perlman and McCann (1999a) reported the results of a survey of 400 college catalogs that identified the most frequently listed undergraduate psychology courses for all four institutional types per the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching taxonomy. Perlman and McCann (1999b) reported the results of a survey of 500 college catalogs that identified the modal undergraduate psychology program for the four institutional types. Demonstrating further importance of this topic, Messer, Griggs, and Jackson (1999), who reported the findings of a survey of 292 college catalogs to identify undergraduate psychology degree options and major requirements, tied for 23rd in average citations with 1.69 per year and for 32nd in total citations with 22.
Analysis of Introductory Textbooks
The remaining survey study that appears on both lists, Marek, Griggs, and Christopher (1999), reported the ratings of 411 psychology students on 15 pedagogical aids in introductory psychology textbooks for familiarity, likelihood of use, and value. In addition, Marek et al. examined 37 introductory textbooks to determine the prevalence of the 15 aids. This study addressed the question of whether these learning aids that add to the length and possibly the cost of the texts are justified by their probability of use and perceived helpfulness. Another article on the total citations Top 20 list, Weiten (1988), had earlier found that the number of pedagogical aids present in a text did not have a significant predictive influence on professors’ impressions of pedagogical quality. Weiten measured 29 objective variables (e.g., number of pedagogical aids present, number of references, and size of glossary) for a sample of 43 introductory textbooks. He also surveyed 857 psychology professors (but there were only 156 usable returns) for their familiarity with the 43 texts and, depending upon their familiarity, to provide ratings on four dimensions (e.g., pedagogical quality and level of discourse). Weiten’s seminal textbook study was highly influential and stimulated numerous other textbook studies, such as the one by Marek et al., in the ensuing decade.
There is another introductory textbook study on the total citations Top 20 list, Gorenflo and McConnell (1991). Gorenflo and McConnell analyzed the reference lists for 24 introductory psychology textbooks to determine the most frequently cited journal articles in introductory texts. This resulted in a massive database with 37,590 bibliographic items. Interestingly, there was not one article that was cited in all 24 textbooks. The highest citation total for an article was 22. Whereas textbook research was a heavily investigated topic in the late 1980s and throughout the 1990s, interest in this topic has lessened recently. The total number of citations for all three of these textbook studies combined was only seven during the past 5 years. Current introductory textbook studies typically tend to be far more limited in scope, assessing the presence and nature of the coverage of specific topics, such as disability (Goldstein, Siegel, & Seman, 2010) or ethics (Zucchero, 2011).
Critical Thinking, Writing, and Active Learning
The remaining two articles that appear on both lists, King (1995) and Yoder and Hochevar (2005), are concerned with using questioning to teach critical thinking and how active learning can improve student performance on exams, respectively. King’s article appeared in the special issue, “Psychologists Teach Critical Thinking” (Halpern & Nummedal, 1995). Two other articles in this special issue on critical thinking, Angelo (1995) and Wade (1995) also appear on the total citations Top 20 list.
King’s (1995) article described a model of inquiry and how to apply it in cooperative-learning contexts in the classroom as well as in individual reading and study settings. The model emphasizes helping students develop a habit of inquiry by learning to ask thoughtful questions. King’s program of research provides strong support for this inquiry-based learning model, contributing to its credibility and likely to the impact of this article. At first, the frequent citation of Angelo’s (1995) critical thinking article seems somewhat of an anomaly given its length, only a little over one page. Upon closer inspection, however, it is easy to discern a possible reason for this article’s impact––its subject matter. It describes classroom assessment techniques for critical thinking, a topic of much interest to teachers, and Angelo is a coauthor of a seminal handbook on classroom assessment techniques (Angelo & Cross, 1993). This article continues to be cited with 13 (50%) of its 26 citations coming in the last 5 years.
Wade’s (1995) article covers an aspect of teaching critical thinking that is also of much interest to teachers, using writing to develop and assess critical thinking. Wade is a well-respected authority on critical thinking and has (with her colleague, Carol Tavris) authored extensive critical thinking materials. As is likely the case for the other two articles from this special issue on critical thinking, Wade’s reputation probably made a significant contribution to her article’s impact. The only other article on either Top 20 list in addition to Wade’s that deals with writing, Hettich (1990), appeared in a special issue of ToP, “Psychologists Teach Writing” (Nodine, 1990). Hettich’s article dealt specifically with journal writing, a technique that allows students to connect specific course concepts with their experiences. This article’s impact is likely due to the fact that student journal writing is a popular teaching/learning technique that has been used for decades in psychology, sociology, English, education, and other fields. Even given its long history, journal writing still seems to be of interest to the teaching community. Connor-Greene (2000), who demonstrated that journal writing increased student learning and exam grades, tied for 22nd on the average citations list with an average of 1.75 citations per year.
Finally, Yoder and Hochevar (2005) is noteworthy because its total citation data are really strong given that it was published so recently. Its large impact is likely due to its general topic, active learning, and more specifically to Yoder and Hochevar’s finding of empirical support for the efficacy of active learning techniques, indicating that active learning can improve students’ performance on examinations versus lecture, autonomous reading, or video without discussion.
Demonstrating the widespread interest in research on active learning, three other articles on this topic are on one or the other of the two Top 20 lists—Benjamin (1991), Poirier and Feldman (2007), and Gier and Kreiner (2009). Benjamin focused on ways to make large classes into small classes to facilitate active learning and on strategies to promote active learning in the large class. Poirer and Feldman also focused on promoting active learning in large introductory psychology classes, specifically using individual response technology (clickers) to do so. Gier and Kreiner demonstrated that it is possible to incorporate effective active learning methods into PowerPoint-based lectures.
Technology in Teaching
Given their use of computer technology, Poirier and Feldman (2007) and Gier and Kreiner (2009) could also have been grouped with the five other articles on one or the other of the Top 20 lists that deal with technology in teaching. Indicating the strong current research interest in this topic, these two articles along with four other articles—Baker, Wentz, and Wood (2009), DeBord, Aruguete, and Muhlig (2004), Morling, McAuliffe, Cohen, and DiLorenzo (2008), and Stowell and Nelson (2007)—appear on the average citations Top 20 list. Another technology article, Kulik, Kulik, and Cohen (1980), appears on the total citations list. Thus, of the 32 articles on the two lists, more concern technology in teaching than any other topic.
Like Poirier and Feldman (2007), Morling et al. (2008) examined the efficacy of clickers in large introductory classes. Morling et al., however, found that using clickers had only a small, positive effect on exam scores and that students using clickers did not report feeling significantly more engaged during class. Stowell and Nelson (2007) also examined the benefits of clickers versus standard lecture and two other response systems (hand-raising and response cards) on student participation and learning in simulated introductory psychology classes. They found that using clickers or response cards led to more class participation but no significant improvement on postlecture quiz scores. Students using clickers, however, did report greater positive emotion during lecture. The influence of these two articles is largely due to the continuing interest for empirical data on the efficacy of using clickers in teaching. Additional recent articles on this topic include Anthis (2011), Dallaire (2011), and Stowell, Oldham, and Bennett (2010), which all cite the Morling et al., Poirier and Feldman, and Stowell and Nelson articles.
Unlike clickers and PowerPoint™, which are frequently used in psychology classrooms, Baker et al. (2009) examined teaching and learning using Second Life®, the most active virtual world, multiuser environment in higher education. Psychology teachers can use the virtual world as a space to meet with students and to create labs, buildings, and objects that can be used to learn psychology content and skills. The influence of this article is likely due to its cogent discussion of using virtual worlds as educational tools and the current interest in their use in online education (e.g., Stadtlander & Giles, 2010).
DeBord et al. (2004) was concerned with the effectiveness of simpler computer-assisted teaching methods—computer-assisted visuals versus overhead transparencies in lecture and using versus not using an optional website. As with many studies like this one, results showed that whereas students liked the computer-assisted teaching interventions, the interventions had no effect on student performance. The remaining study dealing with instructional technology, Kulik, Kulik, and Cohen (1980), was concerned with the use of much older technology. Kulik et al. reported the findings of a meta-analysis of more than 300 studies on five types of instructional technology, some of which younger teachers may not even know about, such as Keller’s Personalized System of Instruction (Keller, 1968) and Postlethwait’s Audio-Tutorial Approach (Postlethwait, Novak, & Murray, 1972). Given that Kulik et al. reviewed the effects of older instructional technologies, the article is mainly historically significant now as evidenced by the fact it has received only five citations in the past 10 years.
Diversity
Two articles on the average citations list are concerned with diversity—Case (2007) and Kernahan and Davis (2007). The impact of these two articles is likely due to the increasing research interest in the efficacy of diversity courses in psychology. Both of these articles provided quantitative data indicating the effectiveness of such courses. Case’s results included greater awareness of White privilege and racism and more support for affirmative action by the end of the term. Kernahan and Davis also found increases in awareness of racism, in realization of the extent of White privilege, and in feelings of racial guilt and responsibility. Undoubtedly, these reported positive benefits of the diversity courses have also contributed to the research impact of these two articles.
Assessment
Two articles on the average citations Top 20 list, Schaeffer, Epting, Zinn, and Buskist (2003) and Keeley, Smith, and Buskist (2006), are concerned with the Teacher Behavior Checklist (TBC) developed by Buskist, Sikorski, Buckley, and Saville (2002). The TBC identifies student and faculty perspectives on the qualities and corresponding behaviors of effective teachers. Schaeffer et al. surveyed 95 faculty and 231 students at a Midwestern community college using the TBC to assess their perspectives on effective teaching. In general, faculty and students’ rankings of the top 10 qualities or behaviors of effective teachers were very similar, thereby replicating Buskist et al.’s earlier findings for the TBC. Keeley et al. converted the TBC to an evaluative instrument to assess teaching and then evaluated this modified TBC via factor and psychometric analyses, providing evidence that the modified TBC is a psychometrically sound instrument that clearly identifies specific target behaviors that instructors can alter to improve their teaching. The impact of these two articles is likely due to their finding of empirical support for an instrument to not only identify the qualities and behaviors of effective teachers but also possibly to use as a tool for assessing teaching.
Halonen et al. (2003) also dealt with assessment, but outcomes assessment rather than individual teacher assessment. This article discussed a comprehensive multidimensional rubric to describe the progress of students’ acquisition of scientific inquiry skills throughout their academic experience and provides an example of an authentic assessment that demonstrates use of the rubric. Development of this rubric centered on some ideas from Halpern (1988), an older ToP article on assessing student outcomes. Like Halonen et al., the Halpern article has also been influential, just missing making the total citations list. It tied for 21st with 24 citations. The impact of Halonen et al. can be seen in recent articles on the assessment of more specific rubrics for grading APA-style introductions (Stellmack, Konheim-Kalkstein, Manor, Massey, & Schmitz, 2009) and for assessing student learning outcomes using a class assignment (Thaler, Kazemi, & Huscher, 2009).
Two other articles deal with student assessment (testing) issues—Benjamin, Cavell, and Shallenberger (1984) on the total citations list and Leeming (2002) on the average citations list. Benjamin et al. reviewed the findings of 33 studies on changing initial answers on objective tests and found that most students who change their answers improve their test scores and that the majority of answer changes are from incorrect to correct, dispelling the myth that one should not change answers on objective tests. Leeming evaluated the exam-a-day procedure to determine whether it improves performance. He found that giving a short exam at the start of every class led to significantly better grades than in classes where the same material was taught but with only four exams. The exam-a-day students also believed that this procedure led to more studying and better learning and reported that they liked the procedure. The impact of both articles most likely stems from the fact that both deal with important testing issues—changing answers on objective tests and the value of more frequent testing.
Student Misconceptions and Knowledge
The oldest article on either Top 20 list is Vaughan (1977), fourth on the total citations list with 40 citations. Interestingly, this was Vaughan’s only article published in ToP. Her study dealt with introductory psychology students’ misconceptions about psychology, their prevalence, and the difficulty in dispelling them. This was and still is a topic of much interest to psychology teachers, especially introductory psychology teachers. Vaughan developed a true–false Test of Common Beliefs (TCB) and found that introductory psychology students enter the course with a wide variety of misconceptions, but these have little effect on their performance in the course and are resistant to change by text reading and class discussion. Vaughan’s article was very influential for the next decade or so, stimulating much research and more articles on student misconceptions. Three of these articles have also gathered many citations. Gutman (1979) and Lamal (1979) have 24 citations and were among those tied for 21st on the list, and Gardner and Dalsing (1986) tied for 32nd with 22 citations. Some other studies (e.g., Brown, 1984; Gardner & Hund, 1983; Ruble, 1986), however, found fault with several of the TCB items. Because of these latter findings and the results of Griggs and Ransdell (1987) that indicated maybe rather than assessing student misconceptions, the TCB itself may have been misconceived, this cottage industry of research slowed down considerably. Empirical research on misconceptions in introductory students, especially on trying to dispel them (e.g., Kowalski & Taylor, 2009), however, continues, and citations to Vaughan continue at a decent rate (10 in the last 10 years).
Bunnell (1992), another article on the total citations list, examined the historical awareness of psychology majors and found that before taking a course in the history of psychology, students showed a low level of recognition of eminent contributors and their contributions to the history of psychology, markedly inferior to that of faculty members. Bunnell concluded that without explicit instruction, students acquire little knowledge of the history of their discipline. The impact of this article seems to have grown with 16 (59%) of its 27 citations coming in the last 10 years, likely related to continued interest in the structure of the undergraduate psychology curriculum (e.g., Stoloff et al., 2010) and the role that the history of psychology course plays in that structure.
Careers for Psychology Majors
Ware and Meyer (1981) surveyed 275 psychology majors who had graduated between May 1973 and August 1978 with respect to several dimensions such as additional education, income, employment status, and satisfaction with the major. Whereas these survey data were influential in the past, their influence has greatly lessened because of their age (over three decades old). The Ware and Meyer article has had no citations in the last 5 years and only two in the last 10 years.
Using Feature Films in Psychology Courses
The only article remaining to be discussed is Fleming, Piedmont, and Hiam (1990), which is on the total citations Top 20 list. Fleming et al. examined the effectiveness of using feature films in an interdisciplinary course on psychopathology, Psychology and Film: Images of Madness. Two other articles on using feature films in psychology courses were also ranked relatively high in total citations. Anderson (1992) was tied for 26th with 23 citations, and Boyatzis (1994) was tied for 52nd with 19 citations. Anderson was concerned with the use of feature films in a psychology and the law course, and Boyatzis with their use in teaching social development in a Middle Childhood course. All three of these studies found that students responded positively to the films and that using feature films led to valuable educational experiences. It appears that studies on the viability of using feature films in psychology courses have had far more impact than one might think, and this impact continues. For example, Fleming et al. received 17 (65%) of its 26 citations in the last 10 years.
Summary and Conclusions
The present results are entirely consistent with ToP’s history of low impact factors. For example, 71% of the articles published in ToP (1975–2011) have less than five citations, and 39% have either no citations or only one citation. Regardless, a substantial core of more heavily cited articles have still been influential. The majority of these articles are the longer Topical Articles, and many report the results of large survey studies. The topics of these influential articles are varied but encompass those most important to the psychology teaching community, such as academic dishonesty, the undergraduate psychology curriculum, active learning, critical thinking, assessment, diversity courses, and technology in teaching.
As predicted, the age of articles impacted the two citation indexes. On average, the articles on the Top 20 total citations list were older than those on the average citations Top 20 list. Seventy percent of the articles on the average citations list were published in the 2000s, but only 10% of those on the total citations list were. In addition, 65% of the articles on the average citations list received 100% of their citations in the last 10 years, but this is only true for 5% of the articles on the total citations list. Another major difference between the two lists is the strong presence of articles on the use of technology in teaching on the average citations list, indicating the current importance of this topic. Six of the 20 articles on the average citations list dealt with this topic, but only 1 of the 20 on the total citations list did, and it dealt with outdated instructional technology.
Given our finding of substantial impact for large survey studies, it seems that conducting such studies on some of the more important topics in using technology in teaching (e.g., the efficacy of using personal response systems) would prove very beneficial to the psychology teaching community. It would also seem that it is time for updating the earlier influential survey studies on academic dishonesty, the undergraduate psychology curriculum, and the graduate student mentor relationship, because these findings have become rather dated but the topics have maintained their importance. It would also seem that a large survey study on assessment would be very influential, given that outcomes assessment is becoming an essential part of the higher education landscape. Research reviews on important teaching topics such as the efficacy of active learning techniques should also prove to be influential. We realize that conducting large survey studies and research reviews requires a large investment of time and effort; but based on the present findings, such studies should not only be very influential and valuable to the teaching community but also increase the researchers’ probability of adding to ToP’s list of “greatest hits.”
Footnotes
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
