Relationships Among Study Guide Format,Academic Motivation,Self-Efficacy,and Student Grades

Abstract

Background: Limited research has compared relationships among student characteristics, study guide format, and academic performance. Objective: This study investigated relations among student characteristics (motivation, self-efficacy) and academic performance, examined the efficacy of study guide format on performance, and aggregated student recommendations for improving study guides. Method: Data was collected from three sections of a Child Psychology course (93 students) via a pre-survey, post-survey, and four exams. Students were assigned one study guide for each exam: instructor-created, student-created, class-created, or small group. Results: Students’ self-efficacy predicted exam and final course performance. Most exam performance did not vary by guide format. However, students who used the small group and student-created guides performed better on Exam 2. Students reported wanting more instructor support on study guide creation. Conclusion: Student characteristics such as self-efficacy can predict academic performance, but additional research is needed to disentangle relationships between study guide format and performance. Teaching Implications: Educators should intentionally support students’ self-efficacy throughout the semester. Given that students may prefer less effective study formats, lessons on effective study habits should be integrated into coursework.

Keywords

study guide motivation self-efficacy academic achievement

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bandura

. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

Bartsch

R. A.

Case

K. A.

Meerman

. (2012). Increasing academic self-efficacy in statistics with a live vicarious experience presentation. Teaching of Psychology, 39(2), 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628312437699

Cetin

. (2015). Academic motivation and self-regulated learning in predicting academic achievement in college. Journal of International Education Research, 11(2), 95–106 https://doi.org/10.19030/jier.v11i2.9190.

Contreras

B. P.

Dovgan

Johnson

Kahng

. (2020). Comparing student-created to teacher-created study guides within an interteaching framework. Teaching of Psychology, 48(4), 287–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320979864

Cushen

P. J.

Hackathorn

Vázquez Brown

M. D.

Rife

S. C.

Joyce

A. W.

Smith

E. D.

Bordieri

M. J.

Anderson

P. W.

Karlsson

M. E.

Daniels

. (2019). “What’s on the test?”: The impact of giving students a concept-list study guide. Teaching of Psychology, 46(2), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628319834171

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

A. G.

Buchner

. (2007). G* power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

Glynn

S. M.

Taasoobshirazi

Brickman

. (2009). Science motivation questionnaire: Construct validation with nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20267

Gurung

R. A

. (2003). Pedagogical aids and student performance. Teaching of Psychology, 30(2), 92–95. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP3002_01

Hackathorn

Joyce

A. W.

Bordieri

. (2018). Do these things even work? A call for research on study guides. Essays from Excellence in Teaching, 17. http://teachpsych.org/E-xcellence-in-Teaching-Blog/5506547

10.

Harackiewicz

J. M.

Barron

K. E.

Elliot

A. J

. (1998). Rethinking achievement goals: When are they adaptive for college students and why? Educational Psychologist, 33(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3301_1

11.

Hartwig

M. K.

Dunlosky

. (2012). Study strategies of college students: Are self-testing and scheduling related to achievement? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(1), 126–134. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0181-y

12.

Heo

Han

. (2018). Effects of motivation, academic stress and age in predicting self-directed learning readiness (SDLR): Focused on online college students. Education and Information Technologies, 23(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9585-2

13.

Hollingsead

C. C.

Ostrander

R. J.

Schilling

. (2004). Study guides: Teacher tips: A review of literature with practical implications. Language Arts Journal of Michigan, 20(2), 13. https://doi.org/10.9707/2168-149X.1234

14.

Horton

S. V.

Lovitt

T. C

. (1989). Using study guides with three classifications of secondary students. The Journal of Special Education, 22(4), 447–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246698902200406

15.

Hoyt

L. T.

Cohen

A. K.

Dull

Castro

E. M.

Yazdani

. (2021). Constant stress has become the new normal”: Stress and anxiety inequalities among US college students in the time of COVID-19. Journal of Adolescent Health, 68(2), 270–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.10.030

16.

Hudson

Ormsbee

C. K.

Myles

B. S

. (1994). Study guides: An instructional tool for equalizing student achievement. Intervention in School and Clinic, 30(2), 99–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/105345129403000206

17.

Izuchi

M. N.

Onyekuru

B. U

. (2017). Relationships among academic self-concept, academic motivation and academic achievement among college students. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 5(2), 93–102.

18.

Kaufman

J. C.

Agars

M. D.

Lopez-Wagner

M. C

. (2008). The role of personality and motivation in predicting early college academic success in non-traditional students at a Hispanic-serving institution. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(4), 492–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.11.004

19.

Kitsantas

Zimmerman

B. J

. (2008). College students’ homework and academic achievement: The mediating role of self-regulatory beliefs. Metacognition and Learning, 4(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9028-y

20.

Lloyd

E. P.

Walker

R. J.

Metz

M. A.

Diekman

A. B

. (2018). Comparing review strategies in the classroom: Self-testing yields more favorable student outcomes relative to question generation. Teaching of Psychology, 45(2), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628318762871

21.

Mafinejad

M. K.

Aghili

Emami

Malek

Baradaran

Taghavinia

Khamseh

M. E

. (2014). Study guides: Effective tools to improve self-directed learning skills of medical students. Acta Medica Iranica, 1(52), 781–785.

22.

Mega

Ronconi

De Beni

. (2014). What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 121. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033546

23.

Panadero

Alonso-Tapia

Huertas

J. A

. (2012). Rubrics and self-assessment scripts effects on self-regulation, learning and self-efficacy in secondary education. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 806–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.007

24.

Pintrich

P. R

. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667–686. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667

25.

Ryder

., & Graves

M. F

. (2003). Reading and Learning in the Content Areas (2nd ed.). Wiley.

26.

Stanton

J. D.

Sebesta

A. J.

Dunlosky

. (2021). Fostering metacognition to support student learning and performance. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-12-0289

27.

Thomas

D. R

. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748

28.

Trevino

N. N.

DeFreitas

S. C

. (2014). The relationship between intrinsic motivation and academic achievement for first generation Latino college students. Social Psychology of Education, 17(2), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9245-3

29.

Weinstein

McDermott

K. B.

Roediger

H. L. III

. (2010). A comparison of study strategies for passages: Rereading, answering questions, and generating questions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16(3), 308–316. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020992