Navigating the New Frontier: Recommendations to Address the Crisis and Potential of AI in the Classroom

Abstract

Introduction

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into higher education ushers in a new era of teaching and learning possibilities for both educators and students.

Statement of the Problem

These technologies not only offer unparalleled opportunities for personalized learning and instructional support, but also introduce challenges related to academic integrity.

Literature Review

The literature highlights AI's versatile applications in education, from facilitating research to acting as a tutor.

Teaching Implications

Educators can create AI-informed assignments that encourage active learning, critical thinking, and creativity. AI tools can be integrated as supports rather than substitutes for learning and foster an ethical framework within which students can explore AI's capabilities.

Conclusion

This review of AI's impact on education and the discussion of teaching strategies underscore the need for a nuanced approach to integrating AI in the classroom. By acknowledging both the challenges and opportunities presented by AI, educators can enhance teaching and learning while upholding academic standards.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence education AIED educational technology AI policy AI ethics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adıgüzel

Kaya

M. H.

Cansu

F. K.

(2023). Revolutionizing education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3), ep429. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13152

Alkaissi

McFarlane

S. I.

(2023). Artificial hallucinations in ChatGPT: Implications in scientific writing. Cureus, 15(2), e35179. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35179

Athaluri

S. A.

Manthena

S. V.

Kesapragada

V. K. M.

Yarlagadda

Dave

Duddumpudi

R. T. S.

(2023). Exploring the boundaries of reality: Investigating the phenomenon of artificial intelligence hallucination in scientific writing through ChatGPT references. Cureus, 15(4), e37432. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37432

Autistica (n.d.). AI Summit Report: How can artificial intelligence support early intervention? https://www.autistica.org.uk/our-research/collaborative-workshops-or-summits/ai-summit-report

Bodnick

(2023, July 18). ChatGPT goes to Harvard. Slow Boring. https://www.slowboring.com/p/chatgpt-goes-to-harvard

Borenstein

Howard

(2020). Emerging challenges in AI and the need for AI ethics education. AI and Ethics, 1(1), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-020-00002-7

Bowen

J. A.

Watson

C. E.

(2024). Teaching with AI: A practical guide to a new era of human learning. Johns Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.56021/9781421449227

Bubaš

Čižmešija

(2023, May). A critical analysis of students’ cheating in online assessment in higher education: Post-COVID-19 issues and challenges related to conversational artificial intelligence. In 2023 46^th MIPRO ICT and Electronics Convention (MIPRO) (pp. 905–910). IEEE.

Caulfield

(2024, May 30). University policies on AI writing tools, overview & list. Scribbr. Retrieved July 10, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/ai-tools/chatgpt-university-policies/

10.

Coffey

(2024, February 9). Professors cautious of tools to detect AI-generated writing. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/tech-innovation/artificial-intelligence/2024/02/09/professors-proceed-caution-using-ai

11.

Crawford

Cowling

Allen

K. A.

(2023). Leadership is needed for ethical ChatGPT: Character, assessment, and learning using artificial intelligence (AI). Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(3), 02. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.3.02

12.

Draxler

Werner

Lehmann

Hoppe

Schmidt

Buschek

Welsch

(2024). The AI ghostwriter effect: When users do not perceive ownership of AI-generated text but self-declare as authors. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 31(2), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/3637875

13.

Eaton

(2023, November 17). Syllabi policies for AI generative tools. Google Docs. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RMVwzjc1o0Mi8Blw_-JUTcXv02b2WRH86vw7mi16W3U/edit?usp=embed_facebook

14.

Fleck

Richmond

A. S.

(2022). Does the instructors gender identity and syllabus design affect students perceptions of their instructor? Teaching of Psychology, 51(2), 166–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283211072742

15.

Fowler

G. A.

(2023, June 2). Detecting AI may be impossible. That’s a big problem for teachers. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/06/02/turnitin-ai-cheating-detector-accuracy

16.

Ghimire

Edwards

(2024). From guidelines to governance: A study of AI policies in education. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 299–307). Springer Nature Switzerland.

17.

Gurung

R. A. R.

(2023, September 5). Get a FEAL for AI. The Teaching Professor. https://www.teachingprofessor.com/topics/teaching-strategies/teaching-with-technology/get-a-feal-for-ai/

18.

Kalir

(2022, August 8). Annotate your syllabus 4.0. https://remikalir.com/blog/annotate-your-syllabus-4-0

19.

Levy

Rakovski

C. C.

(2006). Academic dishonesty: A zero tolerance professor and student registration choices. Research in Higher Education, 47(6), 735–754. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11162-006-9013-8

20.

Liang

Yuksekgonul

Mao

Zou

(2023). GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers. Patterns, 4(7), 100779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100779

21.

Meincke

Mollick

E. R.

Terwiesch

(2024). Prompting diverse ideas: Increasing AI idea variance. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.01727

22.

Metz

(2023, November 6). Chatbots may ‘hallucinate’ more often than many realize. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/06/technology/chatbots-hallucination-rates.html

23.

Milano

McGrane

J. A.

Leonelli

(2023). Large language models challenge the future of higher education. Nature Machine Intelligence, 5(4), 333–334. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-023-00644-2

24.

Mitchell

(2019). Artificial intelligence: A guide for thinking humans. Pelican Books.

25.

Mollick

E. R.

(2024). Co-intelligence: Living and working with AI. Penguin Random House.

26.

Mrabet

Studholme

. (2023). ChatGPT: A friend or a foe?. In 2023 International conference on computational intelligence and knowledge economy (pp. 269–274). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIKE58312.2023.10131713

27.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2018). Data science for undergraduates: Opportunities and options. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25104 https://doi.org/10.17226/25104

28.

Nolan

(2023, January 30). Here are the schools and colleges that have banned the use of ChatGPT over plagiarism and misinformation fears. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/chatgpt-schools-colleges-ban-plagiarism-misinformation-education-2023-1

29.

Oregon State University (2024a). AI in teaching and learning at OSU. https://canvas.oregonstate.edu/courses/1965953/modules

30.

Oregon State University (2024b). Syllabi and assignment AI icons. https://oregonstate.app.box.com/s/drnx7bwf749scblv50mov53j13cr3dd2

31.

Oregon State University (2024c). Bloom’s taxonomy revisited. https://ecampus.oregonstate.edu/faculty/artificial-intelligence-tools/blooms-taxonomy-revisited.pdf

32.

Oregon State University (2024d). AI decision tree. https://ecampus.oregonstate.edu/faculty/artificial-intelligence-tools/decision-tree/

33.

Quinn

(2024, April 16). Annual provosts’ survey shows need for AI policies, worries over campus speech. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/governance/executive-leadership/2024/04/16/provosts-survey-shows-need-ai-policies-speech

34.

Rahman

M. M.

Watanobe

(2023). ChatGPT for education and research: Opportunities, threats, and strategies. Applied Sciences, 13(9), 5783. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095783

35.

Rajapakse

Polwattage

Guruge

Jayathilaka

Edirisinghe

Thelijjagoda

(2018). ALEXZA: A mobile application for dyslexics utilizing artificial intelligence and machine learning concepts. 2018 3rd International Conference on Information Technology Research (ICITR) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITR.2018.8736130

36.

Roose

(2023, January 12). Don’t ban ChatGPT in schools. Teach with it. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/12/technology/chatgpt-schools-teachers.html

37.

Rudolph

Tan

(2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 342–363. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9

38.

Southworth

Migliaccio

Glover

Reed

McCarty

Brendemuhl

Thomas

(2023). Developing a model for AI across the curriculum: Transforming the higher education landscape via innovation in AI literacy. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100127

39.

Stanford

(2023). AI tool list for educators. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1m7Pbj3QhI-O0LLfWDpcV–C0nQt7BB9NR54_CZqw9mY/edit

40.

Stanford

(2024). AI in education resources. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10liDts1-F0GxnU-723wlmc3nNA9tOgAPMSsdYhFYoRY/edit?gid=0#gid=0

41.

Stubbs-Richardson

Brown

Paul

Brenner

(2023). Artificial intelligence applications for social science research. Scholars Junction, Mississippi State University. https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/ssrc-publications/6/

42.

Tan

(2020). Artificial intelligence in education: Rise of the machines. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 3(1), 129–133. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.17

43.

Watson

C. E.

Bowen

J. A.

(2024). Teaching with AI: A practical guide to a new era of human learning. Johns Hopkins University Press.

44.

Wollny

Schneider

Di Mitri

Weidlich

Rittberger

Drachsler

(2021). Are we there yet? A systematic literature review on chatbots in education. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4, 654924. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.654924

45.

Wood

(2023, February 28). Oxford and Cambridge ban ChatGPT over plagiarism fears but other universities choose to embrace AI bot. iNews. https://inews.co.uk/news/oxford-cambridge-ban-chatgpt-plagiarism-universities-2178391

46.

(2023). Do AI chatbots improve students learning outcomes? Evidence from a meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(1), 10–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13334