Patient classification in anaesthetic care is an undeveloped field and it is therefore urgent to construct an instrument for this purpose. The aim of the study was to develop an instrument to measure anaesthetic nursing care with focus on the unique care needed by every single patient. The Delphi technique was used. The method involved five series of inquiries to a panel of experts, consisting of ten nurses. The instrument developed, included 13 nursing care areas, with predefined alternatives graded from 1 to 4, where 4 indicated high workload, and 1 indicated low workload. The instrument was tested in a pilot study and showed agreement with the clinical picture of the patients needs. An initial inter-rater reliability test showed very good agreement for all the nursing care areas. The instrument, however, needs to be tested for validity and reliability in a larger sample.
LindöL. Nya styrmodeller kräver nya verktyg. Landstings Världen1994; 2: 40–42.
2.
NeedhamJ. Accuracy in workload measurement: A fact or fallacy?Journal of Nursing Management1997; 5: 83–87.
3.
ProciukJ.L.BeetstraJ. Workload/outcome measurement för hospital educators. Confirming the value of education. Journal of Nursing Staff Development1998; 14: 7–15.
4.
AthlinE.EngströmB.AxelssonK.SandmanPO. Vårdtyngdsmätning -jämförelse prövning av instrument för klassificering. Vård i Norden1992; 12: 3–4, 40–44.
5.
MowinskiJ.RuthE.BevelyB.JohnL. Selecting, implementing and evaluating patient classification system: A measure of productivity. Nursing Administration Quarterly. 1989; 14: 24–35.
HaglöfY. Perioperativ vård S:t Eriks ögonsjukhus, anestesiavdelningen: Vad tycker sjuksköterskorna på avdelningarna?Stockholm: SPRI, 1992.
8.
HaglöfY. Omvårdnad och dokumentation: Ett maktmedel för anestesisjuksköterskan?Ventilen, 1998; 4: 8–11.
9.
WattsS.BrooksÅ. Patients' perceptions of the pre-operative information they need about events they may experience in intensive care unit. Journal of Advanced Nursing1997; 26: 85–92.
10.
AnderssonI. Vårdtyngd och vård-organisation — vårdens villkor vid minskade resurser. 2 uppl.Lund: Studentlitteratur, 1988.
11.
SPRI. Vårdtyngdsmätning. Exempel från svensk sjukvård. Spri rapport 291. Stockholm: SPRI, 1990.
12.
FagerströmL. Measuring the unmeasurable. Journal of Nursing Management1998; 6: 165–172.
13.
LevenstamA-KNordbringF. Ett styrsystem för patientklassificering som ger överblick över omvårdnadsbehovet. Läkartidningen1987; 84(30–31): 2426–2428.
14.
LevenstamA-KEngbergBergbom I. The Zebra system –a new patient classification system. Journal of Nursing Management1993; 1: 229–237.
15.
WilliamsPLWebbC. Clinical supervision skills: A Delphi and critical incident technique study. Medical Teacher1994; 16(2/2): 139–157.
16.
WalkerÅ.M.SelfeJ. The Delphi Study of Research Priorities in the Clinical Practice of Physiotherapy. Physiotherapy1994; 80.
17.
SumsionT. The Delphi technique: An adaptive research tool. British Journal of Occupational Therapy1998; 61: 153–156.
18.
NotterJ.L.BeetstraJ. Forskningsmetodik inom omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur, 1994.
19.
WilliamsP.L.WebbC. The Delfi technique: A methodological discussion. Journal of Advanced Nursing1994; 19: 180–186.
20.
WalkerÅ.M.SelfeJ. The Delphi method: A useful tool för the allied health researcher. British Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation1996; 3: 677–681.
21.
LarssonU-B. Perioperativ omvårdnad — ur anestesisjuksköterskans perspektiv. Ventilen1999; 4: 11–13.
22.
GreenS. Travelling via Delphi: A New Route to the Accreditation of Fieldwork Educators. British Journal of Occupational Therapy1996; 59: 506–510.
ÖsterwallP. »Load and go« eller »stay and play«?Läkartidningen1999; 96: 3862–3864.
25.
AltmanD. Practical statistics för medical research. London: Chapman & Hall, 1999.
26.
CohenLManionL. Research methods in education. London: Routledge, 1989.
27.
AronssonÅ. SPSS för Windows 95. En introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur1997.
28.
IsgörD. Patientklassificering i tiden. Värd1998; 2: 84–91.
29.
De GrootH.A.. Patient Classification System Evaluation Part 1: Essential System Elements. Journal of Nursing Management1989; 19: 30–35.
30.
FagerströmL. Expertvalidering av Oulu Patient Classification. — En fas i utvecklingen av ett nytt system för vårdtyngdsklassificering, RAFAELA. Vård i Norden2000; 3: 15–21.
31.
LevenstamA-KEngbergBergbom I. How to translate nursing care into codes and staffing requirements: Part two in the Zebra system. Journal of Nursing Management1997; 5: 105–114.
