Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Evaluation of Device Materials: Are We “Failsafe”?

Abstract

The development of the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube for enteral access was a revolutionary technological advance. This device has undergone some minor modification over the past 30 years but remains very similar to the original PEG tube design. Use of the PEG tube for gastric enteral feeding access continues to increase yearly both in pediatric and adult populations. One of the difficulties noted with PEG tube use in daily clinical practice is the ultimate degradation of the PEG tube wall material, leading to tube cracking, tearing, and leaking, requiring replacement of the gastrostomy tube. Historically, the predominant polymer material used for PEG tube composition was silicone. More recently, polyurethane has been examined as a potential, more durable material for PEG tube composition. Copolymers, or combinations of silicone and polyurethane and other polymer materials, are currently under investigation as the answer for the development of a bioinert, tissue-friendly, durable, PEG tube composition material.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Gauderer MWL, Ponsky J, Izant RJ Jr. Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg. 1980;15:872– 875.

Gottlieb K, Mobarhan S. Microbiology of the gastrostomy tube. J Am Coll Nutr. 1994 ;4:311– 313.

Gottlieb K, Leya J, Kruss DM, Mobarhan S, Iber FL. Intraluminal fungal colonization of gastrostomy tubes. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;39:413– 415.

Van De Hazel SJ, Mulder CJJ, Den Hartdog G, Thies JE, Westhof W. A randomized trial of polyurethane and silicone percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy catheters. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000 ;14:1273– 1277.

Sartori S, Trevisani L, Neilsen I, Tassinari D, Ceccotti P, Abbas-ciani V. Longevity of silicone and polyurethane catheters in long term enteral feeding via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003 ;17:853– 856.

Blacka J, Donoghue J, Sutherland M, et al. Dwell time and functional failure of percutaneous gastrostomy tubes: a randomized controlled comparison between silicon polymer and polyurethane and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004 ;20:875– 882.

Trevisani L, Sartori S, Rossi M, et al. Degradation of polyurethane gastrostomy devices: what is the role of fungal colonization? Digest Dis Sci. 2005 ;50:463– 469.

Trudel J, Gauderer MW, Drews MJ. Lipid uptake by silicone enteral access feeding devices. J Pediatr Surg. 1998 ;188:880– 884.

Dautle MP, Ulrich RL, Hughes TA. Typing and subtyping of 83 clinical isolates purified from surgically implanted silicone feeding tubes by random amplified polymorphic DNA amplification. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:414– 421.

10.

Dautle MP, Wilkinson RT, Gauderer MW. Isolation and identification of biofilm microorganisms from silicone gastrostomy devices. J Pediatr Surg. 2003;38:216– 220.

11.

Patel JD, Ebert M, Stokes K, Ward R, Anderson JM. Inhibition of bacterial and leukocyte stress conditions by material surface chemistry. J Biomat Sci Polym Ed. 2003 ;14:279– 295.