Computer Technology and the Nutrition Support Professional: Make It Work For You!

Abstract

Healthcare professionals caring for patients receiving enteral and parenteral nutrition (PN) are faced with the need to develop and expand their technologic skills. Patients and their caregivers are finding information from the Internet that healthcare professionals are then tasked with evaluating for accuracy and veracity. Healthcare professionals themselves must be able to rapidly find information to answer clinical questions that arise during daily practice. Information-seeking skills must be well developed in order to find information from the Internet, as well as in the professional literature. Such skills include the ability to formulate a search strategy that limits extraneous results as much as possible yet ensures that relevant results are not missed.

In addition, electronic health records are being implemented in many facilities now, with a national goal of an electronic health record in place by 2014. Clinicians must be involved with implementation at all stages, including planning, purchasing, implementing, and evaluating an electronic system. Electronic health records can include very sophisticated components that provide for computerized physician order entry (CPOE) and decision support. Nutrition support must be an integral part of these systems.

This paper provides some background information on the Internet and the World Wide Web, along with strategies to find information using search engines. Information is also provided on the use of MEDLINE to search medical literature. Finally, a brief overview of the electronic health record is provided, with suggestions for involvement by nutrition support clinicians in implementation of electronic health records in the workplace.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

US Department of Commerce. A nation online: entering the broadband age. 2004. Available at: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/reports/anol/NationOnlineBroadband04.htm. Accessed February 1, 2007.

Sood A, Erwin PJ, Ebbert JO. Using advanced search tools on PubMed for citation retrieval. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004 ;79:1295– 1299; quiz 1300.

Sullivan D. Nielsen NetRatings: search engine ratings. August 22, 2006. Available at: http://searchenginewatch.com/showpage.html?page=2156451. Accessed February 1, 2007.

Health Information Technology Institute. Criteria for assessing the quality of health information on the Internet. October 14, 1997. Available at: http://www.mitretek.org/hiti/showcase/documents/criteria.html. Accessed February 1, 2007.

Green ML, Ruff TR. Why do residents fail to answer their clinical questions? A qualitative study of barriers to practicing evidence-based medicine. Acad Med. 2005 ;80:176– 182.

Chang AA, Heskett KM, Davidson TM. Searching the literature using medical subject headings versus text word with PubMed. Laryngoscope. 2006 ;116:336– 340.

Katcher BS. MEDLINE: A Guide to Effective Searching in PubMed and Other Interfaces. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: The Ashbury Press; 2006.

Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, eds. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.

Transforming healthcare: the President's health information technology plan. Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/technology/economic_policy200404/chap3.html. Accessed November 30, 2004.

10.

Sequist TD, Cullen T, Hays H, Taualii M, Simon SR, Bates DW. Implementation and use of an electronic health record within the Indian Health Service. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 ;14:191– 197.

11.

McDonald CJ. The barriers to electronic medical record systems and how to overcome them. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997 ;4:213– 221.

12.

Walsh SH. The clinician's perspective on electronic health records and how they can affect patient care. BMJ. 2004 ;328:1184– 1187.

13.

Baron RJ, Fabens EL, Schiffman M, Wolf E. Electronic health records: just around the corner? Or over the cliff? Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:222– 226.

14.

Berg M. Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges. Int J Med Inform. 2001 ;64:143– 156.

15.

Lising M, Kennedy C. A multimethod approach to evaluating critical care information systems. Comput Inform Nurs. 2005 ;23:27– 37.

16.

de Lusignan S, van Weel C. The use of routinely collected computer data for research in primary care: opportunities and challenges. Fam Pract. 2006 ;23:253– 263.

17.

Bates DW, Teich JM, Lee JS, Seger D, Kuperman GJ, Ma'Luf N. The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999 ;6:313– 321.

18.

Kawamoto K, Lobach DF. Proposal for fulfilling strategic objectives of the U.S. Roadmap for National Action on Decision Support through a service-oriented architecture leveraging HL7 services. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14:146– 155.

19.

Bates DW, Kuperman GJ, Wang S, et al. Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 ;10:523– 530.

20.

Brokel JM, Shaw MG, Nicholson C. Expert clinical rules automate steps in delivering evidence-based care in the electronic health record. Comput Inform Nurs. 2006 ;24:196– 205.

21.

Fieschi M, Dufour JC, Staccini P, Gouvernet J, Bouhaddou O. Medical decision support systems: old dilemmas and new paradigms? Methods Inf Med. 2003;42:190– 198.

22.

Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ. 2005 ;330:765 .

23.

Bond CS. Surfing or drowning? Student nurses' internet skills. Nurse Educ Today. 2004 ;24:169– 173.

24.

Bickford CJ, Smith K, Ball MJ, et al. Evaluation of a nursing informatics training program shows significant changes in nurses' perception of their knowledge of information technology. Health Inform J. 2005;11:225– 235.