Observations on ward rounds suggested that psychiatric patients might be at special risk of removal from their general practitioner's list. Little has been published on why patients are struck off and our first attempt at investigation was by direct appeals for patients. This drew a small and unsatisfactory sample. We then asked two family health services authorities to distribute questionnaires to struck-off patients. One agreed, but later withdrew cooperation. There is a danger that struck-off patients will become an underclass excluded from primary care. We propose anonymous collection of information by health authorities, so that policy can be reviewed if necessary.
References
1.
Department of Health.The Care Programme Approach for People with a Mental Illness Referred to the Specialist Psychiatric Services.London: Department of Health, 1990.
2.
Department of Health.The Health of the Nation.London: HMSO, 1991.
3.
The Lothian Survey.GP News 27 October 1995: 27.
4.
O'ReillyD, SteeleK, MerrimanB, GillilandA, BrownS.Patient removals from general practitioner lists in Northern Ireland: 1987–1996.Br J Gen Practice1998; 48: 1669–73.
5.
SkinnerJ, MunroJ.Unwelcome customers? Exploring the epidemiology of removal from GP lists [Abstract].J Epidemiol Commun Health1997; 51: 587.
6.
Royal College of General Practitioners.Removal of Patients from GPs lists. Guidance for College Members.London: RCGP, 1997.
7.
RobertsH, RushtonL, MuirKThe use of family health service authority registers as a sampling frame in the UK: a review of theory and practice.J Epidemiol Commun Health1995; 49: 344–7.
8.
ColeE, LeaveyG, KingM, Johnson-SabineE, HoarA.Pathways to care for patients with a first episode of psychosis.Br J Psychiatry1995; 167: 770–6.
9.
BrindleD.GPs right to strike off patients hit.Guardian 12 May 1999.
10.
Department of Health.The New NHS: Modern, Dependable.London: DoH, 1997.
