My original article on Mk 2.15 was published in 1993 as ‘Mark 2.15: The Home of Jesus or Levi?’ in NTS 39: 147–49. This essay is a reflection on that short article and a sketch of the original factors that contributed to its creation. The 1993 article and other works highlight how the role of ‘house’ and household language in Mark’s Gospel provide both a social and narrative setting for (1) the subversion of first-century social institutions, (2) the reorientation of social values, especially related to kinship, and (3) the illustration of Jesus’s honor as a reputational legitimate authority.
CulpepperR. Alan1983Anatomy of the Fourth Gospel: A Study in Literary Design (Philadelphia, PA: Fortress).
6.
ElliottJohn H.1981A Home for the Homeless: A Sociological Exegesis of 1 Peter, Its Situation and Strategy (Philadelphia, PA: Fortress).
7.
ElliottJohn H.1993What Is Social-Science Criticism? (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress).
8.
ElliottJohn H.2008‘From Social Description to Social-Scientific Criticism: The History of a Society of Biblical Literature Section 1973–2005’, BTB38:26–36.
9.
FowlerRoger1986Linguistic Criticism (New York: Oxford University Press).
HansonK. C.OakmanDouglas E.1998Palestine in the Time of Jesus: Social Structures and Social Conflicts, 2nd ed. (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress).
12.
KarrisRobert J.1985Luke: Artist and Theologian (New York: Paulist Press).
13.
KelberWerner J.1983The Oral and the Written Gospel (Philadelphia, PA: Fortress).
14.
KilpatrickG. D.1956‘Some Notes on Markan Usage’, BT, 7: 2–9.
15.
KingStephen n. d. ‘Writing: Where Do You Get Your Ideas?’, Frequently Asked Questions: Writinghttps://stephenking.com/faq/ (accessed 18 June 2025).
16.
LaneWilliam1974The Gospel of Mark (NICNT; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
17.
LentMichaelMcCarthyBrian2014Obit: Stephen King (Portland, OR: Tidalwave).
18.
MalinaBruce J.1981New Testament World: Insights from Cultural Anthropology (Atlanta, GA: John Knox).
19.
MalinaBruce J.1986Christian Origins and Cultural Anthropology: Practical Models for Biblical Interpretation (Atlanta: John Knox).
20.
MalinaBruce J.1996‘The Bible: Witness or Warrant: Reflections on Daniel Patte’sEthics of Biblical Interpretation’, BTB26: 82–87.
21.
MalinaBruce J.NeyreyJerome1988Calling Jesus Names: The Social Value of Labels in Matthew (Sonoma, CA: Polebridge).
22.
MalbonElizabeth Struthers1985‘ΤΗ ΟΙΚΙΑ ΑΥΤΟΥ: Mark 2.15 in Context’, NTS31: 282–93.
23.
MayDavid M.1987‘Mark 3:20-35 from the Perspective of Shame/Honor’, BTB17: 83–87.
24.
MayDavid M.1991Social Scientific Criticism of the New Testament: A Bibliography (Macon, GA: Mercer University Press).
25.
MayDavid M.1993‘Mark 2.15: The Home of Jesus or Levi?’, NTS39: 147–49.
26.
MooreSally Falk1978Law as Process: An Anthropological Approach (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).
27.
MoxnesHalvor2018‘Social Science Perspectives in Early Christian Studies in a Nordic Context’, BTB48: 76–84.
28.
NeyreyJerome1986‘The Idea of Purity in Mark’s Gospel’, Semeia35: 91-128.
29.
OsiekCarolyn1992‘The Social Sciences and the Second Testament: Problems and Challenges’, BTB22: 88–95.
30.
PattersonColin S.T.D.2019‘The World of Honor and Shame in the New Testament: Alien or Familiar?’, BTB49: 4–14.
31.
RuetherRosemary Radford1984‘Church and Family 1: Church and Family in the Scriptures and Early Christianity’, NBf65: 4–14.
32.
TanMelissa Chia-Mei2024‘A Close, Critical Reading of the Original Model of Honour-Shame from Bruce Malina’, Paper Presentation, Society of Biblical Literature Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA.
33.
TaylorVincent1952The Gospel According to St Mark (London: Macmillan).
