This paper proposes two different path following control schemes for a stratospheric airship with actuator saturation. Each of the control schemes consists of a guidance loop and an attitude control loop. In both schemes, guidance laws are designed according to the line-of-sight guidance-based path following principle. In the first control scheme, a robust H∞ controller without constraints is designed based on the planar model of a stratospheric airship to stabilize path-following errors. The input constraints are then addressed by using a regional -based model recovery anti-windup compensator, which prevents the unconstrained controller from misbehaving in the constrained closed loop with anti-windup augmentation and ensures the systematic stability. In the second control scheme, model predictive control is applied to guarantee the path-following of the closed-loop system and explicitly address the magnitude and rate of rudders of the stratospheric airship. Theoretical results are illustrated by numerical simulations where both closed-loop systems are capable of following their desired paths and the constraints on control inputs are satisfied.
AshrafMZChoudhryMA (2013) Dynamic modeling of the airship with Matlab using geometrical aerodynamic parameters. Aerospace Science and Technology25(1): 56–64.
2.
AzinheiraJRDe PaivaECRamosJJr. (2000) Mission path following for an autonomous unmanned airship. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference robotics and automation, ICRA’00, vol. 2, pp.1269–1275. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
3.
BreivikMFossenT (2004) Path following for marine surface vessels. In: OCEANS’04. MTTS/IEEE TECHNO-OCEAN’04, vol. 4, pp.2282–2289. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
4.
ChenBM (2013) Robust and H∞ Control. Springer Science & Business Media.
5.
Do ValleRCMenegaldoLLSimõesAM (2014) Smoothly gain-scheduled control of a tri-turbofan airship. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics38(1): 53–61.
6.
FryeMTGammonSMQianC (2007) The 6-DOF dynamic model and simulation of the tri-turbofan remote-controlled airship. In: American Control Conference, ACC’07, 2007, pp.816–821. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
7.
GaleaniSTarbouriechSTurnerM. (2009) A tutorial on modern anti-windup design. In: European Control Conference, 2009, pp.306–323. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
8.
GrüneLPannekJ (2010) Nonlinear Model Predictive Control: Theory and Algorithms. London: Springer, pp.125.
9.
HanDWangXLChenL. (2016a) Command-filtered backstepping control for a multi-vectored thrust stratospheric airship. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control38(1): 93–104.
10.
HanDWangXLChenL. (2016b) Adaptive backstepping control for a multi-vectored thrust stratospheric airship with thrust saturation in wind. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 230(1): 45–59.
11.
HerrmannGMenonPPTurnerMC. (2010) Anti-windup synthesis for nonlinear dynamic inversion control schemes. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control20(13): 1465–1482.
12.
InamotoYSaitoKShibasakiK. (2003) Flight control testing for the development of stratospheric platform airships. In: AIAA 3rd aviation technology, integration, and operations (ATIO) conference, Denver, USA. Chicago: AIAA, 1–11.
13.
JamisonLSommerGPorcheIRIII (2005) High-altitude airships for the future force army. Rand Arroyo Center, Santa Monica CA.
14.
KendiTADoyleFJ (1997) An anti-windup scheme for multivariable nonlinear systems. Journal of Process Control7(5): 329–343.
15.
LeeYGKimDMYeomCH (2006) Development of Korean high altitude platform systems. International Journal of Wireless Information Networks13(1): 31–42.
16.
LiZSunJOhS (2009) Path following for marine surface vessels with rudder and roll constraints: an MPC approach. In: American Control Conference, ACC’09, 2009, pp.3611–3616. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
17.
LieskTNahonMBouletB (2013) Design and experimental validation of a nonlinear low-level controller for an unmanned fin-less airship. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology21(1): 149–161.
18.
MorariMLeeJH (1999) Model predictive control: past, present and future. Computers and Chemical Engineering23(3): 667–682.
19.
MoutinhoAAzinheiraJR (2005) Stability and robustness analysis of the AURORA airship control system using dynamic inversion. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, ICRA 2005, pp.2265–2270. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
20.
PaluszekMJZhaoY (2004) Development of an aerodynamic model and control law design for a high altitude airship. In: AIAA 3rd unmanned unlimited technical conference, workshop and exhibit, vol. 6479, pp.415–431. Chicago: AIAA.
21.
SmithMSRainwaterEL (2003) Applications of scientific ballooning technology to high altitude airships. In: Proceedings 3rd annual technical forum, american institute of aeronautics and astronautics, pp. 1–8.
22.
TarbouriechSTurnerM (2009) Anti-windup design: an overview of some recent advances and open problems. IET Control Theory and Applications3(1): 1–19.
23.
TeelAR (1999) Anti-windup for exponentially unstable linear systems. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control9(10): 701–716.
24.
TeelARKapoorN (1997) The L2 anti-windup problem: its definition and solution. In: European Control Conference, pp.1897–1902. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
25.
WuXMoogCHMarquez-MartinezLA. (2013) Full model of a buoyancy-driven airship and its control in the vertical plane. Aerospace Science and Technology26(1): 138–152.
26.
YangYYanY (2015) Neural network gain-scheduling sliding mode control for three-dimensional trajectory tracking of robotic airships. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering229(6): 529–540.
27.
YangYYanYZhuZ. (2014) Positioning control for an unmanned airship using sliding mode control based on fuzzy approximation. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering228(14): 2627–2640.
28.
ZaccarianLTeelAR (2004) Nonlinear scheduled anti-windup design for linear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control49(11): 2055–2061.
29.
ZaccarianLTeelAR (2011) Modern Anti-windup Synthesis: Control Augmentation for Actuator Saturation: Control Augmentation for Actuator Saturation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
ZhengZHuoW (2013) Planar path following control for stratospheric airship. IET Control Theory and Applications7(2): 185–201.
31.
ZhengZHuoWWuZ (2012) Trajectory tracking control for underactuated stratospheric airship. Advances in Space Research50(7): 906–917.
32.
ZhengZHuoWWuZ (2013) Autonomous airship path following control: theory and experiments. Control Engineering Practice21(6): 769–788.
33.
ZhengZWuZ (2013) Global path following control for underactuated stratospheric airship. Advances in Space Research52(7): 1384–1395.
34.
ZhuBHuoW (2014) 3-D path-following control for a model-scaled autonomous helicopter. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology22(5): 1927–1934.
35.
ZhuEPangJSunN. (2014) Airship horizontal trajectory tracking control based on active disturbance rejection control (ADRC). Nonlinear Dynamics75(4): 725–734.
