This paper develops a systematic iterative learning control (ILC) strategy for systems with mismatched disturbances. The systems with mismatched disturbances are more general and widely exist in practical engineering, where the standard disturbance observer based ILC method is no longer available. To this end, this note proposes a novel ILC scheme based on the disturbance observer, which consists of two parts: a baseline ILC term for stabilizing the nominal system and a disturbance compensation term for attenuating mismatched disturbances by choosing an appropriate compensation gain. It is proven that the performance of the closed-loop system is effectively improved. Finally, the simulation analysis for a permanent-magnet synchronous motor servo system demonstrates the feasibility and efficacy of the proposed method.
AhnHSChenYQMooreKL (2007) Iterative learning control: brief survey and categorization. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part C: Applications and Reviews37(6): 1099–1121.
2.
AgrawalRFaloutsosCSwamiA (1993) Efficient Similarity Search in Sequence Databases. Berlin: Springer.
3.
BristowDATharayilMAlleyneAG (2006) A survey of iterative learning control. IEEE Control Systems Magazine26(3): 96–114.
4.
BuXHYuFSHouZSet al. (2012) Robust iterative learning control for nonlinear systems with measurement disturbances. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics23(6): 906–913.
5.
BristowDA (2010) Optimal iteration-varying iterative learning control for systems with stochastic disturbances. In: Proceedings of the 2010 American control conference, Marriott Waterfront, Baltimore, MD, 30 June-02 July 2010, pp.1296–1301. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
6.
ChoiJYLeeJS (2000) Adaptive iterative learning control of uncertain robotic systems. IEE Proceedings – Control Theory and Applications147(2): 217–223.
7.
ChenWH (2003) Nonlinear disturbance observer-enhanced dynamic inversion control of missiles. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics26(1): 161–166.
8.
ChenWH (2004) Disturbance observer based control for nonlinear systems. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics9(4): 706–710.
9.
ChenWHBallanceDJGawthropPJet al. (2000) A nonlinear disturbance observer for robotic manipulators. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics47(4): 932–938.
10.
ChenYQMooreKL (2002) Harnessing the nonrepetitiveness in iterative learning control. In: Proceedings of the 41st IEEE conference on decision and control, Las Vegas, NV, 10–13 December 2002, pp.3350–3355. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
11.
DongLLYouSL (2014) Adaptive control of an active magnetic bearing with external disturbance. ISA Transactions53(5): 1410–1419.
GaoZQHuangYHanJQ (2001) An alternative paradigm for control system design. In: Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE conference on decision and control, Orlando, FL, 4–7 December 2001, pp.4578–4585. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
14.
GuoLCaoSY (2014) Anti-disturbance control theory for systems with multiple disturbances: A survey. ISA Transactions53(4): 846–849.
15.
HuangYXueWC (2014) Active disturbance rejection control: methodology and theoretical analysis. ISA Transactions53(4): 963–976.
16.
HanJQ (1998) Auto-disturbance rejection control and its applications. Control and Decision13(1): 19–23.
17.
JiaLShiJPChiuMS (2013) Neuro-fuzzy-based dynamic quadratic criterion-iterative learning control for batch process. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control35(1): 92–101.
18.
LiSHWuCHSunZX (2016) Design and implementation of clutch control for automotive transmissions using terminal sliding mode control and uncertainty observer. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology65(4):1890–1898.
19.
LiSHZhongKLiuHX (2011) A composite speed controller based on a second-order model of permanent magnet synchronous motor system. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control33(5): 522–541.
20.
LiSHZhouMMYuXH (2013) Design and implementation of terminal sliding mode control method for PMSM speed regulation system. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics9(4): 1879–1891.
21.
LiuHXLiSH (2012) Speed control for PMSM servo system using predictive functional control and extended state observer. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics59(2): 1171–1183.
22.
MerryRvan de MolengraftRSteinbuchM (2005) The influence of disturbances in iterative learning control. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE conference on control applications, Toronto, Canada, 28–31 August 2005, pp.974–979. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
23.
MerryRvan de MolengraftRSteinbuchM (2008) Iterative learning control with wavelet filtering. International Journal of Robust Nonlinear Control18(10): 1052–1071.
24.
MataušekMRRibićAI (2009) Design and robust tuning of control scheme based on the PD controller plus disturbance observer and low-order integrating first-order plus dead-time model. ISA Transactions48(4): 410–416.
25.
MondalSMahantaC (2013) Chattering free adaptive multivariable sliding mode controller for systems with matched and mismatched uncertainty. ISA Transactions52(3): 335–341.
26.
NorrlöfMGunnarssonS (1998) Some results on iterative learning control with disturbances. Technical report, Department of Electrical Engineering, Linköping University, Sweden.
27.
NorrlöfMGunnarssonS (2001) Disturbance aspects of iterative learning control. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence14(1): 87–94.
28.
NorrlöfM (2002) An adaptive iterative learning control algorithm with experiments on an industrial robot. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation18(2): 245–251.
29.
RogersEGalkowskiKOwensDH (2007) Control systems theory and applications for linear repetitive processes. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
30.
SunBSGaoZQ (2005) A DSP-based active disturbance rejection control design for a 1-kW H-bridge DC-DC power converter. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics52(5): 1271–1277.
31.
WangHMLiSHLanQXet al. (2016) Continuous terminal sliding mode control with extended state observer for PMSM speed regulation system. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1177/0142331216630361.
32.
WangSKWangJZZhaoJB (2013) Application of PD-type iterative learning control in hydraulically driven 6-DOF parallel platform. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control35(5): 683–691.
33.
WeiXJGuoL (2009) Composite disturbance-observer-based control and terminal sliding mode control for non-linear systems with disturbances. International Journal of Control82(6): 1082–1098.
34.
WeiXJGuoL(2010) Composite disturbance observer based control and H∞ control for complex continuous models. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control20(1): 106-118.
35.
YuSWTomizukaM (2009) Performance enhancement of iterative learning control system using disturbance observer. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics, Singapore, 14–17 July 2009, pp.987–992. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
36.
YuSW (2011) Enhanced iterative learning control with applications to a wafer scanner system. PhD Dissertation, Berkeley, University of California, USA.
37.
YangJLiSHSuJYet al. (2013a) Continuous nonsingular terminal sliding mode control for systems with mismatched disturbances. Automatica49(7): 2287–2291.
38.
YangJLiSHYuXH (2013b) Sliding-mode control for systems with mismatched uncertainties via a disturbance observer. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics60(1): 160–169.
39.
YangJZolotasAChenWHet al. (2011) Robust control of nonlinear MAGLEV suspension system with mismatched uncertainties via DOBC approach. ISA Transactions50(3): 389–396.
40.
ZhengQGaoZQ (2010) On practical applications of active disturbance rejection control. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Chinese control conference, Beijing, China, 29–31 July 2010, pp.6095–6100. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
