In this study, a nonlinear predictive control method is developed for the active steering control of a sport utility vehicle. The method is tested on a nonlinear mathematical model of an 11-degree-of-freedom vehicle. The system performance is evaluated by considering that the control law must keep the actual yaw rate close to the desired yaw rate and minimizing the vertical load changes at each wheel. The latter is proposed for this work. The vertical load changes play an important role in the dynamics and the stability of the system. The effectiveness of the control method is demonstrated through numerical simulation by using a vehicle model that includes three case studies: rapid lane change at low and high velocities and the fishhook manoeuvre. The results show that the stability of the vehicle is maintained and its rollover propensity is decreased. In addition, the proposed controller is compared with a well-known linear model predictive controller.
AbeM (2009) Vehicle Handling Dynamics: Theory and Application. London: Butterworth-Heinemman.
2.
AckermannJBunteTOdenthalD (1999) Advantages of active steering for vehicle dynamics control. In: Symposium on Automotive Technology and Automation, Vienna, Austria, pp. 263–270.
3.
ArslanMS (2016) Vehicle stability enhancement by an energy optimal control approach. In: Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Gothenburg, Sweden. IEEE, pp. 546–551.
4.
ArslanMSFukushimaN (2015) Energy optimal control design for steer-by-wire systems and hardware-in-the-loop simulation evaluation. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control137(7): 071005.
5.
ArslanMSSeverM (2017) Vehicle stability enhancement by a nonlinear model predictive control method. In: Turkish National Conference on Automatic Control (TOK 2017), Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 617–622.
6.
BealCEGerdesJC (2013) Model predictive control for vehicle stabilization at the limits of handling. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology21(4): 1258–1269.
7.
BorrelliFFalconePKeviczkyTAsgariJHrovatD (2005) MPC-based approach to active steering for autonomous vehicle systems. International Journal of Vehicle Autonomous Systems3(2-4): 265–291.
8.
CarlsonCRGerdesJC (2003) Optimal rollover prevention with steer by wire and differential braking. Proceedings of IMECE3: 16–21.
9.
ChenBCPengH (2001) Differential-braking-based rollover prevention for sport utility vehicles with human-in-the-loop evaluations. Vehicle System Dynamics36(4–5): 359–389.
10.
ElmiNOhadiASamadiB (2013) Active front-steering control of a sport utility vehicle using a robust linear quadratic regulator method, with emphasis on the roll dynamics. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering227(12): 1636–1649.
11.
FakhraeiJKhanloHMDehghaniR (2017) Nonlinear dynamic behavior of a heavy articulated vehicle with magnetorheological dampers. Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics12(4): 041017.
12.
FalconePBorrelliFAsgariJTsengHEHrovatD (2007) Predictive active steering control for autonomous vehicle systems. IEEE Transactions on control systems technology15(3): 566–580.
13.
FalconePBorrelliFTsengHEAsgariJHrovatD (2008) Linear time-varying model predictive control and its application to active steering systems: Stability analysis and experimental validation. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control18(8): 862–875.
14.
ForkenbrockGGarrottW (2004) Testing the dynamic rollover resistance of two 15-passenger vans with multiple load configurations. Report DOT HS 809 704, US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
15.
FukaoTMiyasakaSMoriKAdachiNOsukaK (2004) Active steering systems based on model reference adaptive nonlinear control. Vehicle System Dynamics42(5): 301–318.
16.
GasparPSzasziIBokorJ (2004) The design of a combined control structure to prevent the rollover of heavy vehicles. European Journal of Control10(2): 148–162.
17.
GüvençBAGüvençLKaramanS (2009) Robust yaw stability controller design and hardware-in-the-loop testing for a road vehicle. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology58(2): 555–571.
18.
HatipogluCÖzgünerURedmillKA (2003) Automated lane change controller design. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems4(1): 13–22.
19.
KeviczkyTFalconePBorrelliFAsgariJHrovatD (2006) Predictive control approach to autonomous vehicle steering. In: American Control Conference, Minnenapolis, MN. IEEE.
20.
KienckeUNielsenL (2005) Automotive Control Systems: For Engine, Driveline, and Vehicle (2nd edn). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
21.
LarishCPiyabongkarnDTsourapasVRajamaniR (2013) A new predictive lateral load transfer ratio for rollover prevention systems. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology62(7): 2928–2936.
22.
LuP (1994) Nonlinear predictive controllers for continuous systems. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics17(3): 553–560.
23.
LuSLiYChoiS (2012) Contribution of chassis key subsystems to rollover stability control. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of automobile engineering226(4): 479–493.
24.
MammarSKoenigD (2002) Vehicle handling improvement by active steering. Vehicle System Dynamics38(3): 211–242.
25.
MarchCShimT (2007) Integrated control of suspension and front steering to enhance vehicle handling. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering221(4): 377–391.
26.
OniwaYShimizuY (2008) Evaluation method for steer assist feeling around steering center and control design on eps. Journal of Mechanical Systems for Transportation and Logistics1(1): 77–87.
27.
RahimiSNaraghiM (2017) Design of an integrated control system to enhance vehicle roll and lateral dynamics. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control40(5): 1435–1446.
28.
RajamaniR (2011) Vehicle dynamics and control. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
29.
RajamaniRPiyabongkarnDN (2013) New paradigms for the integration of yaw stability and rollover prevention functions in vehicle stability control. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems14(1): 249–261.
30.
SahinHLiuYWangXGordaninejadFEvrenselCFuchsA (2007) Full-scale magnetorheological fluid dampers for heavy vehicle rollover. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures18(12): 1161–1167.
31.
ShibahataY (2005) Progress and future direction of chassis control technology. Annual Reviews in Control29(1): 151–158.
32.
SolmazSCorlessMShortenR (2006) A methodology for the design of robust rollover prevention controllers for automotive vehicles: Part 1-differential braking. In: 2006 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. IEEE, pp. 1739–1744.
33.
SolmazSCorlessMShortenR (2007) A methodology for the design of robust rollover prevention controllers for automotive vehicles with active steering. International Journal of Control80(11): 1763–1779.
34.
WalzMC (2005) Trends in the static stability factor of passenger cars, light trucks, and vans. Technical report, NHTSA.
35.
YihPGerdesJC (2005) Modification of vehicle handling characteristics via steer-by-wire. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology13(6): 965–976.
36.
YimS (2011) Design of a preview controller for vehicle rollover prevention. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology60(9): 4217–4226.
37.
YimSLimCWOhMH (2013) An investigation into the structures of linear quadratic controllers for vehicle rollover prevention. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering227(4): 472–480.
38.
YoonJChoWKangJKooBYiK (2010) Design and evaluation of a unified chassis control system for rollover prevention and vehicle stability improvement on a virtual test track. Control Engineering Practice18(6): 585–597.
39.
YoonJKimDYiK (2007) Design of a rollover index-based vehicle stability control scheme. Vehicle System Dynamics45(5): 459–475.
40.
ZhaoWJiLWangC (2017) H∞ control of anti-rollover strategy based on predictive vertical tire force. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control40(13): 3587–3603.
41.
ZhengBAnwarS (2009) Yaw stability control of a steer-by-wire equipped vehicle via active front wheel steering. Mechatronics19(6): 799–804.
