A novel guaranteed tracking performance control scheme is presented for the reentry vehicle encountered in actuator saturation and enormous amount of uncertainties via time-varying barrier Lyapunov function (TVBLF) method. The required stable and transient tracking performance of the reentry attitudes are simultaneously enhanced by the proposed logarithm-type TVBLF and the control design complexity is reduced compared with the prescribed performance technique. Moreover, in order to eliminate the control performance degradation caused by the actuator constraints, an auxiliary error compensation design is inserted into the control law. In addition, the uncertainty rejection capability of the control system is achieved by exploiting the MIMO nonlinear extended disturbance observer. Finally, the uniform ultimately boundedness of the closed-loop system is established and numerical simulations are verified to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed control law for the reentry vehicle subject to attitude constraints, actuator saturations and uncertainties.
AnHXiaHWangC (2017) Barrier Lyapunov function-based adaptive control for hypersonic flight vehicles. Nonlinear Dynamics88(3): 1โ21.
2.
BechlioulisCPRovithakisGA (2008) Robust adaptive control of feedback linearizable mimo nonlinear systems with prescribed performance. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control53(9): 2090โ2099.
3.
BuXWuXZhuF, et al. (2015) Novel prescribed performance neural control of a flexible air-breathing hypersonic vehicle with unknown initial errors. ISA Transactions59: 149โ159.
4.
CaiGSongJChenX (2014) Flight control system design for hypersonic reentry vehicle based on LFT-LPV method. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering228(7): 1130โ1140.
5.
Costa daRRChuQPMulderJA (2003) Reentry flight controller design using nonlinear dynamic inversion. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets40(1): 64โ71.
6.
FarrellJPolycarpouMSharmaM (2004) On-line approximation based control of uncertain nonlinear systems with magnitude, rate and bandwidth constraints on the states and actuators, In: Proceeding of 2004 American Control Conference, Boston, USA, 30 Juneโ2 July 2004, pp. 2557โ2562. Piscataway, NY: IEEE.
7.
FengZGuoJZhouJ (2017) Robust constrained autopilot control for a generic missile in the presence of state and input constraints. Optik - International Journal for Light and Electron Optics149: 49โ58.
8.
FuJWangLChenM (2015) Invariant set based sliding mode control for near-space vehicles with attitude constraints. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering230(5): 793โ804.
9.
GeorgieJValasekJ (2003) Evaluation of longitudinal desired dynamics for dynamic-inversion controlled generic reentry vehicles. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics26(5): 811โ819.
10.
GinoyaDShendgePDPhadkeSB (2013) Sliding mode control for mismatched uncertain systems using an extended disturbance observer. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 61(4): 1983โ1992.
11.
GuoJFengZZhouJ (2018a) Robust state-constrained control design for nonlinear systems with uncertainties using a new barrier Lyapunov function. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control40(12): 3489โ3497.
12.
GuoJXiongYZhouJ (2018b) A new sliding mode control design for integrated missile guidance and control system. Aerospace Science and Technology78: 54โ61.
13.
GuoJGWangGQGuoZYZhouJ (2018c) New adaptive sliding mode control for a generic hypersonic vehicle. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering232(7): 1295โ1303.
14.
GuoZChangJGuoJZhouJ (2018) Adaptive twisting sliding mode algorithm for hypersonic reentry vehicle attitude control based on finite-time observer. ISA Transactions77: 20โ29.
15.
HalbeORajaRGPadhiR (2014) Robust reentry guidance of a reusable launch vehicle using model predictive static programming. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics37(1): 134โ148.
16.
HallCEShtesselYB (2012) Sliding mode disturbance observer-based control for a reusable launch vehicle. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics29(6): 1315โ1328.
17.
HanJ (2009) From PID to active disturbance rejection control, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics56(3): 900โ906.
18.
HuYMDuanGRTanF (2018). Control of LPV systems subject to state constraints and input saturation. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control40(14): 3985โ3993.
19.
KimKBangH (2014) Adaptive nonlinear control for a reusable space vehicles longitudinal dynamics under model uncertainties. Transactions of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences57(1): 49โ59.
20.
KimSOhHTsourdosA (2013) Nonlinear model predictive coordinated standoff tracking of a moving ground vehicle. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics36(2): 557โ566.
21.
RenBGeSSTeeKPLeeTH (2010) Adaptive neural control for output feedback nonlinear systems using a barrier Lyapunov function. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks21(8): 1339โ1345.
22.
ShaoXWangH (2015) Active disturbance rejection based trajectory linearization control for hypersonic reentry vehicle with bounded uncertainties. ISA Transactions54: 27โ38.
23.
ShaoXWangH (2016) Back-stepping robust trajectory linearization control for hypersonic reentry vehicle via novel tracking differentiator. Journal of the Franklin Institute353(9): 1957โ1984.
24.
ShengYZGengJLiuXDWangL (2015) Nonsingular finite-time second order sliding mode attitude control for reentry vehicle. International Journal of Control Automation and Systems13(4): 853โ866.
25.
SunLHuoWJiaoZ (2016) Adaptive backstepping control of spacecraft rendezvous and proximity operations with input saturation and full-state constraint. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics64(1): 480โ492.
26.
SwaroopDHedrickJKYipPPGerdesJC (2002) Dynamic surface control for a class of nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control45(10): 1893โ1899.
27.
TeeKPGeSSTayEH (2009) Barrier Lyapunov Functions for the control of output-constrained nonlinear systems. Automatica45(4): 918โ927.
28.
TeeKPRenBGeSS (2011) Control of nonlinear systems with time-varying output constraints. Automatica47(11): 2511โ2516.
29.
TianBFanWSuRZongQ (2015a) Real-time trajectory and attitude coordination control for reusable launch vehicle in reentry phase. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics62(3): 1639โ1650.
30.
TianBLuHZuoZZongQ (2018) Multivariable uniform finite-time output feedback reentry attitude control for RLV with mismatched disturbance. Journal of the Franklin Institute355(8): 3470โ3487.
31.
TianBYinLWangH (2015b) Finite-time reentry attitude control based on adaptive multivariable disturbance compensation. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics62(9): 5889โ5898.
32.
WangCXWuYQZhangZC (2018) Tracking control for strict-feedback nonlinear systems with time-varying full state constraints. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control40(14): 3964โ3977.
33.
WangFTianBDongQZongQ (2016) Disturbance observer-based sliding mode backstepping control for a re-entry vehicle with input constraint and external disturbance. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control38(2): 165โ181.
34.
WangLShengYLiuX (2015) Continuous time-varying sliding mode based attitude control for reentry vehicle. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering229(2): 197โ220.
35.
WuYYaoJ (2016) Barrier Lyapunov function-based adaptive output feedback failure compensation for a class of non-linear systems with unknown dead-zone non-linearity. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control39(8): 1169โ1181.
36.
YaoJDengW (2017a) Active disturbance rejection adaptive control of hydraulic servo systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics64(10): 8023โ8032.
37.
YaoJDengW (2017b) Active disturbance rejection adaptive control of uncertain nonlinear systems: theory and application. Nonlinear Dynamics89(6): 1โ14.
38.
YuYWangHLiN, et al. (2017) Automatic carrier landing system based on active disturbance rejection control with a novel parameters optimizer. Aerospace Science and Technology69: 149โ160.
39.
YuYWangHLiN, et al. (2018) Finite-time model-assisted active disturbance rejection control with a novel parameters optimizer for hypersonic reentry vehicle subject to multiple disturbances. Aerospace Science and Technology79: 588โ600.
40.
ZhangJSunT (2016) Disturbance observer-based sliding manifold predictive control for reentry hypersonic vehicles with multi-constraint. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering230(3): 485โ495.
41.
ZhangSWangQDongCY (2018) A novel adaptive dynamic surface control scheme of hypersonic flight vehicles with thrust and actuator constraints. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control40(4): 1362โ1374.
42.
ZhangYWangXWuH (2016) Impact time control guidance with field-of-view constraint accounting for uncertain system lag. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering230(3): 515โ529.
43.
ZongQWangFTianBL (2013) Nonlinear adaptive filter backstepping flight control for reentry vehicle with input constraint and external disturbances. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering228(6): 889โ907.
