In this paper, we study the vibration control for a flexible satellite with adaptive actuator fault-tolerant and input quantization. The control objective is to suppress the vibration of a flexible satellite as well as considering actuator fault-tolerant and input signal quantization. The flexible satellite is composed of a centrebody and two symmetrical flexible solar panels. The symmetrical flexible solar panels are described as two Euler-Bernoulli beams modeled as partial differential equations (PDEs). Quantitative control combines control and communication to solve related control problems in modern engineering systems. Logarithmic quantitative controllers are used to realize input signal quantization. Meanwhile, an adaptive control scheme is designed to regulate the vibration of the satellite when the actuator fails partially. Simulation results are demonstrated for illustration. It is proved that the proposed control scheme can handle the vibration of the flexible satellite as well as considering actuator fault-tolerant and input signal quantization simultaneously.
CaoLQiaoDChenX (2018) Laplace ℓ1 Huber based cubature Kalman filter for attitude estimation of small satellite. Acta Astronautica148: 48–56. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.04.020.
2.
GuanPLiuXLiuJ (2005) Adaptive fuzzy sliding mode control for flexible satellite. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence18(4): 451–459.
3.
GuoYLiS (2007) Stability and stabilization of networked control systems with control input quantization. In: Second International Conference on Innovative Computing, Information and Control (ICICIC 2007), Kumamoto, Japan, September 2007, pp. 348–348. IEEE.
4.
HayakawaTIshiiHTsumuraK (2009) Adaptive quantized control for linear uncertain discrete-time systems. Automatica45(3): 692–700.
5.
HallCDKimM (2007) Dynamics and control of rotating tethered satellite systems. Journal of Spacecraft & Rockets44(3): 649–659.
6.
HeWGeSS (2015) Dynamic modeling and vibration control of a flexible satellite. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems51(2): 1422–1431.
7.
HeWZhangS (2017) Control design for nonlinear flexible wings of a robotic aircraft. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology25(1): 351–357.
8.
HeWMengTHuangDLiX (2018) Adaptive boundary iterative learning control for an Euler–Bernoulli beam system with input constraint. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks & Learning Systems29(5): 1539–1549.
9.
HeWOuyangYHongJ (2017) Vibration control of a flexible robotic manipulator in the presence of input deadzone. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics13(1): 48–59.
10.
HuDSaroshADongY (2011) An improved particle swarm optimizer for parametric optimization of flexible satellite controller.Applied Mathematics and Computation217 (21): 8512–8521.
11.
HuQMaG (2005) Variable structure control and active vibration suppression of flexible spacecraft during attitude maneuver. Aerospace Science and Technology9(4): 307–317.
12.
HuQWangZGaoH (2008) Sliding mode and shaped input vibration control of flexible systems. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems44(2): 503–519.
13.
JiNLiuZLiuJHeW (2018) Vibration control for a nonlinear three-dimensional Euler–Bernoulli beam under input magnitude and rate constraints. Nonlinear Dynamics91(4): 2551–2570.
14.
JiangTLiuJHeW (2016) Boundary and distributed control for a nonlinear three-dimensional Euler-Bernoulli Beam based on infinite dimensional disturbance observer. Asian Journal of Control18(6): 2047–2063.
15.
LaiGLiuZChenCLPZhangY (2016) Adaptive asymptotic tracking control of uncertain nonlinear system with input quantization. Systems & Control Letters96: 23–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2016.06.010.
16.
LipsKModiV (1980) General dynamics of a large class of flexible satellite systems. Acta Astronautica7(12): 1349–1360.
17.
LiuYGuoFHeXHuiQ (2018) Boundary control for an axially moving system with input restriction based on disturbance observers. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems. DOI: 10.1109/TSMC.2018.2843523.
18.
LiuYZhaoZHeW (2016) Boundary control of an axially moving accelerated/decelerated belt system. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control26(17): 3849–3866.
19.
LiuZLiuJHeW (2017) Modeling and vibration control of a flexible aerial refueling hose with variable lengths and input constraint. Automatica77: 302–310. DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2016.11.002.
20.
LiuZLiuJHeW (2018b) Boundary control of an Euler–Bernoulli beam with input and output restrictions. Nonlinear Dynamics92(2): 531–541.
21.
LiuZLiuJWangL (2018a) Disturbance observer based attitude control for flexible spacecraft with input magnitude and rate constraints. Aerospace Science and Technology72: 486–492. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2017.11.036.
22.
LoSChenY (1995) Smooth sliding-mode control for spacecraft attitude tracking maneuvers. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics18(6): 1345–1349.
23.
QuYZhangJWuYWangC (2010) An improved sliding-backstepping control law for large flexible satellite attitude maneuver. In: 2010 3rd International Symposium on Systems and Control in Aeronautics and Astronautics, Harbin, China, June 2010, pp. 918–923.
24.
TanCTaoGQiR (2013) A discrete-time parameter estimation based adaptive actuator failure compensation control scheme. International Journal of Control86(2): 276–289.
25.
TangXTaoGJoshiS (2003) Adaptive actuator failure compensation for parametric strict feedback systems and an aircraft application. Automatica39(11): 1975–1982.
26.
TaoGQiRTanC (2011) A parameter estimation based adaptive actuator failure compensation control scheme. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics22(1): 1–11.
27.
WangCWenCLinY (2015) Decentralized adaptive backstepping control for a class of interconnected nonlinear systems with unknown actuator failures. Journal of the Franklin Institute352(3): 835–850.
28.
WangCWenCLinY (2017) Adaptive actuator failure compensation for a class of nonlinear systems with unknown control direction. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control62(1): 385–392.
29.
WangCWenCLinYWangW (2017) Decentralized adaptive tracking control for a class of interconnected nonlinear systems with input quantization. Automatica81: 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2017.03.010
30.
WangWWenC (2010) Adaptive actuator failure compensation control of uncertain nonlinear systems with guaranteed transient performance. Automatica46(12): 2082–2091.
31.
XiaoBYinS (2019) Exponential tracking control of robotic manipulators with uncertain kinematics and dynamics. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 15(2): 689–698.
32.
XiaoBYangXKarimiHRQiuJ (2019) Asymptotic tracking control for a more representative class of uncertain nonlinear systems with mismatched uncertainties. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2019.2893852.
33.
YunSWYunJCParkPG (2009) H2 control of continuous-time uncertain linear systems with input quantization and matched disturbances. Automatica45(10): 2435–2439.
34.
YunSWYunJCParkPG (2010) Dynamic output-feedback guaranteed cost control for linear systems with uniform input quantization. Nonlinear Dynamics62(1–2): 95–104.
35.
ZhengBYangG (2014) Quantized output feedback stabilization of uncertain systems with input nonlinearities via sliding mode control. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control24(2): 228–246.
