Synchronization of distributed hydropower units is necessary for ensuring the quality of the electric power produced by renewable sources. In this article, a nonlinear optimal control approach is proposed for stabilization and synchronization of distributed hydropower generators. The dynamic model of the interacting hydropower generation units undergoes approximate linearization with the use of first-order Taylor series expansion and the computation of the associated Jacobian matrices. The linearization point is updated at each time-step of the control method. For the approximately linearized model of the distributed hydropower system an H-infinity feedback controller is designed. This controller achieves solution of the related optimal control problem under model uncertainty and external perturbations. For the computation of the controller’s feedback gains an algebraic Riccati equation is repetitively solved at each iteration of the control algorithm. The global asymptotic stability properties of the control method are proven through Lyapunov analysis. Finally, to achieve state estimation-based control for the system of the distributed hydropower generators the H-infinity Kalman Filter is used as a robust state estimator.
AnselARobynsB (2006) Modelling and simulation of an autonomous variable-speed micro hydropower station. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation71: 320–332.
2.
BassevilleMNikiforovI (1993) Detection of abrupt changes: Theory and Applications. New Jersey, USA: Prentice-Hall.
3.
CamaraMBDakyaBNichitaCBarakatG (2009) Simulation of a doubly-feed induction generator with hydro-turbine for electrical energy production; Electromotion 2009. In: Joint Symposium of EPE Chapter Electric Drives, Lille, France, July2009.
4.
ChenDDingCMaX, et al. (2013) Nonlinear dynamic analysis of hydro-turbine governing system with a surge tank. Applied Mathematical Modelling37: 7611–7623.
5.
ChenDDingCDoY, et al. (2014) Nonlinear dynamic analysis for a Francis hydro-turbine governing system and its control. Journal of the Franklin Institute351: 4596–4618.
6.
FlorezJZMartinezJJBesanconGFailleD (2011) Explicit coordination for MPC-based distributed control with application to Hydro-Power Valleys, IEEE CDC-ECC 2011. In: 2011 50th IEEE Conference onf Decision and Control and European Control Conference, Orlando, Florida, December 2011.
7.
GibbsBP (2011) Advanced Kalman Filtering, Least Squares and Modelling: A Practical Handbook. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: J. Wiley.
8.
GuoWYangJ (2018) Stability performance for primary frequency regulation of hydro-turbine governing system with surge tank. Applied Mathematical Modelling54, pp. 446–466.
9.
JinMJHuWLuF (2005) Nonlinear coordinated control of excitation and governor for hydraulic power plants. IEE Proceedings on Generation, Transmission and Distribution162(4): 544–548.
10.
KislorNSainiCPSinghSP (2007) A review on hydropower plant models and control. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews11: 776–796.
11.
LiDChenBXuS, et al. (2017) Dynamic analysis of multi-unit hydropower systems transient process. Nonlinear Dynamics90: 535–548.
12.
LiDNingXChenJ, et al. (2007) Nonlinear robust control for coordinated exhitation and governor of hydroturbine generator units, IEEE ACC 2007. In: Proceedings of the 2007 American Control Conference, New York, USA, June 2007.
13.
LiuSLiDHuangC (2012) Nonlinear robust control with high gain observer for governor of hydroturbine generator sets, IEEE WCICA 2012. In: Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, Beijing, China, July 2012.
14.
LuQSunYSunY, et al. (2004) Nonlinear decentralized robust control for hydro-turbine generator sets in multi-machine power systems. Electric Power and Energy Systems26: 333–339.
15.
MansourSPJonesDIBradleyDA, et al. (2000) Reproducing oscillators behavior of a hydroelectric power section by computer simulation. Control Engineering Practice8: 1261–1272.
16.
MichaudFRobertG (2010) Flatness-based control of a hydro-power plant, IEEE Melecon 2010. In: 2010 15th IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference, Valetta, Malta, April 2010.
17.
RigatosG (2015) Nonlinear Control and Filtering Using Differential Flatness Approaches: Applications to Electromechanicsl Systems. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
18.
RigatosG (2016) Intelligent Renewable Energy Systems: Modelling and Control. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
19.
RigatosGAbbaszadehM (2019) Synchronization of chaotic electronic circuits using nonlinear optimal control. In: IEEE ISIE 2019, 29th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, Vancouver, Canada, June 2019.
20.
RigatosGZhangQ (2009) Fuzzy model validation using the local statistical approach. Fuzzy Sets and Systems60(7): 882–904.
21.
RigatosGSianoPCecatiC (2015) A new non-linear h-infinity feedback control approach for three-phase voltage source converters. Electric Power Components and Systems44(3): 303312.
22.
RigatosGGTzafestasSG (2007) Extended Kalman filtering for fuzzy modelling and multi-sensor fusion, mathematical and computer modelling of dynamical systems 13: 251–266.
23.
RigatosPSianoPWiraPProfumoF (2015) Nonlinear H-infinity feedback control for asynchronous motors of electric trains. Journal of Intelligent Industrial Systems1: 85–98.
24.
RobertGMichaudF (2012) Hydro power plant modelling for generation control applications. In: 2012 American Control Conference, Montreal, Canada, June 2012.
25.
SarasuaJIPerez-DiazJIWilhelmiJRSanchez-FernandezJA (2015) Dynamic response and governor tuning of a long penstock pumped -storage hydropower plant equipped with a pump turbine and a double-fed induction generator. Energy Conversion and Management106: 151–164.
26.
SavorgnanCRomaniCKozmaADiehlM (2011) Multiple shooting for distributed systems with applications in hydro electricity production. Journal of Process Control21: 738–745.
27.
SimonD (2006) A game theory approach to constrained minimax state estimation. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing54(2): 405–412.
28.
TanFZhouLYuFLuJ (2020) Fixed-time continuous stochastic synhronization of two-layer dynamical networks. International Journal of Systems Science51(2): 242–257.
29.
ToussaintGJBasarTBulloF (2000) optimal tracking control techniques for nonlinear underactuated systems. In: Proceedings of IEEE CDC 2000, 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Sydney, Australia, 2000.
30.
XuBChenDTolS, et al. (2018) Model-validation and stocastic stability of a hydro-turbine governing system under hydraulic excitations. Electric Power and Energy Systems95: 156–165.
31.
YiYZhangZChenD, et al. (2017) State feedback predictive control for nonlinear hydro-turbine governing system. Journal of Vibration and Control24: 1–15.
32.
ZengYGuoYZhangL, et al. (2013) Nonlinear hydro-turbine model having a surge tank. Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems19(1): 12–20.
33.
ZhangHChenDWuCWangX (2018) Dynamics analysis of the fast-slow hydro-turbine governing system with different time-scale coupling. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation54: 136–147.
34.
ZhangRChenDYaoW (2017) Non-linear fuzzy predictive control of hydroelectric system. IET Generation, Transmission and Distribution11(8): 1966–1975.
35.
ZhengYZhouJXuY, et al. (2017) A distributed model predictive control based load frequency control scheme for multi-area interconnected power system using discrete-time Laguerre functions. ISA Transactions68: 127–140.
36.
ZhouLTanF (2019) A chaotic secure communication scheme based on synchronisation ofdouble-layered and multiple complex networks. Nonlinear Dynamics96: 869–893.
37.
ZhouLTanFYuFLiuW (2019) Cluster sychronisation of two-layer nonlinearly coupled multiplex networks with multi-links and time-delays. Neurocomputing359: 264–275.
38.
ZhouLWangCDuSZhou (2013) Cluster synchronisation on multiple nonlinearly coupled dynamical subnetworks of complex networks with non-identical loads. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems28(3): 570–583.
