Shielded open-circuited probe for in-situ measurements of soil permittivity in Very high frequency (VHF) and Ultra high frequency (UHF) bands

Abstract

In this paper, the shielded open-circuited probe operating in the wide frequency range from 75MHz to 2GHz is proposed. The probe is made of an SubMiniature version A (SMA) flange connector. The central rod of the SMA connector emerges from a coaxial transition in the flange and shielded by four rods. The robe design allows us to calculate of the probe reflection coefficient S₁₁ used simple analytical transmission line model (TEM wave mode), the parameters of which were calibrated on a set of substances with a known frequency spectrum of permittivity. The refractive index (RI) and normalized attenuation coefficient (NAC) retrieval technique is based on solving the inverse problem of minimizing the residual norm between measured and calculated frequency spectra of reflection coefficient S₁₁. After calibration, the root-mean-square error (determination coefficient) between the measured and calculated module and phase of the reflection coefficient S₁₁ for the sets of calibration media air, distilled water, butanol, pure ice, water solution with NaCl of salinity of 8.9% do not exceed 0.26dB (0.995) and 0.03 rad (0.999), respectively, in the frequency range from 75MHz to 2GHz. The root-mean-square error (determination coefficient) between the measured RI and NAC spectra for four soil cover samples (variation of the clay fraction from 10.5 g/g to 47.6 g/g) using the proposed probe and a precision coaxial cell not exceeds 0.109 (0.993) and 0.057 (0.986), respectively, in the frequency range from 75 MHz to 2 GHz. As a result, it is experimentally shown that RI и NAC can be measured by the proposed non-precision probe with an error comparable to the precision coaxial cell.

Keywords

Soil measurements dielectric spectroscopy frequency domain reflectometry complex permittivity shielded open-circuited probe

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baker-Jarvis

, et al. (2005) Measuring the permittivity and permeability of lossy materials solids, liquids, metals, buildings materials, and negative-index materials. NIST Technical Note 1536, p. 172.

Bircher

, et al. (2016) Soil moisture sensor calibration for organic soil surface layers. Geos. Instr. Meth. and Data System 5: 109–125.

Buckley

Maryott

(1958) Tables of dielectric dispersion data for pure liquids and dilute solutions. Washington, D. C.: U.S. Dept. of Comerce, National Bureau of Standards. 95 p.

Bussey

(1980) Dielectric measurements in a shielded open circuit coaxial line. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 29(2): 120–124.

Demontoux

Razafindratsima

Bircher

, et al. (2017) Efficiency of end effect probes for in-situ permittivity measurements in the 0.5–6 GHz frequency range and their application for organic soil horizons study. Sensors and Actuators, A: Physical 254: 78–88.

Kimball

Moghaddam

(2015) Theoretical modeling and analysis of L- and P-band radar backscatter sensitivity to soil active layer dielectric variations. Remote Sensing 7: 9450–9472.

Guihard

Taillade

Balayssac

, et al. (2019) Permittivity measurement of cementitious materials and constituents with an open-ended coaxial probe: Combination of experimental data, numerical modelling and a capacitive model. RILEM Technical Letters 4: 39–48.

Guihard

Taillade

Balayssac

, et al. (2020) Permittivity measurement of cementitious materials with an open-ended coaxial probe. Construction and Building Materials 230: 116946.

Heimovaara

(1994) Frequency domain analysis of time domain reflectometry waveforms 1. Measurement of the complex dielectric permittivity of soils. Water Resources Research 30(2): 189–199.

10.

Heimovaara

, et al. (1996) Frequency-dependent dielectric permittivity from 0 to 1 GHz: Time domain reflectometry measurements compared with frequency domain network analyzer measurements. Water Resources Research 32(12): 3603–3610.

11.

Jackisch

Germer

Graeff

, et al. (2020) Soil moisture and matric potential – An open field comparison of sensor systems. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12: 683–697.

12.

Komarov

Barber

, et al. (2016) Open-ended coaxial probe technique for dielectric spectroscopy of artificially grown sea ice. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 54(8): 4941–4951.

13.

Lemmetyinen

Schwank

Rautiainen

Kontu

Parkkinen

Mätzler

Wiesmann

Wegmüller

Derksen

Toose

Roy

Pulliainen

(2016) Snow density and ground permittivity retrieved from L-band radiometry: Application to experimental data. Remote Sensing of Environment 180: 377–391.

14.

Lin

, et al. (2017) A novel TDR signal processing technique for measuring apparent dielectric spectrum. Meas. Sci. Technol. 28: 015501.

15.

McCracken

, et al. (1964) Numerical Methods and Fortran Programming with Applications in Engineering and Science. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

16.

Majcher

Kafarski

Wilczek

, et al. (2020) Application of a monopole antenna probe with an optimized flange diameter for TDR soil moisture measurement. Sensors 20(8): 2374.

17.

Mavrovic

Madore

Langlois

, et al. (2020) Snow liquid water content measurement using an open-ended coaxial probe (OECP). Cold Regions Science and Technology 171: 102958.

18.

Mavrovic

Pardo Lara

Berg

, et al. (2021) Soil dielectric characterization during freeze–thaw transitions using L-band coaxial and soil moisture probes. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 25: 1117–1131.

19.

Mavrovic

Roy

Royer

, et al. (2018) Dielectric characterization of vegetation at L band using an open-ended coaxial probe. Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst. 7: 195–208.

20.

Mironov

, et al. (2017) Temperature- and texture-dependent dielectric model for frozen and thawed mineral soils at a frequency of 1.4 GHz. Remote Sensing of Environment 200: 240–249.

21.

Robinson

, et al. (2003) A review of advances in dielectric and electrical conductivity measurement in soils using time domain reflectometry. Vadose Zone Journal. 2(4): 444–475.

22.

Stogryn

(1971) Equations for calculating the dielectric constant of saline water (correspondence). IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 19(8): 733–736.

23.

Szypłowska

, et al. (2016) Soil complex dielectric permittivity spectra determination using electrical signal reflections in probes of various lengths. Vadose Zone Journal 15(3): 1–12.

24.

Szerement

, et al. (2019) A seven-rod dielectric sensor for determination of soil moisture in well-defined sample volumes. Sensors 19: 1646.

25.

Szerement

, et al. (2020) Dielectric properties of glass beads with talc as a reference material for calibration and verification of dielectric methods and devices for measuring soil moisture. Materials 13(8): 1968.

26.

, et al. (2012) Short, multineedle frequency domain reflectometry sensor suitable for measuring soil water content. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 76(6): 1929–1937.

27.

Wagner

(2011) On the coupled hydraulic and dielectric material properties of soils: combined numerical and experimental investigations. In: 9th International Conference on Electromagnetic Wave Interaction with Water and Moist Substances, USA, Kansas City, 31 May–3 June 2011, pp. 152–161.

28.

Wilczek

, et al. (2016) Time-domain reflectometry method with variable needle pulse width for measuring the dielectric properties of materials. Sensors 16(2): 191.

29.

Woszczyk

Szerement

Lewandowski

, et al. (2019) An open-ended probe with an antenna for the measurement of the water content in the soil. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 167: 105042.

30.

Woszczyk

, et al. (2020) A modified open-ended probe as a reliable tool for measurements of soil water content. In: Baltic URSI Symposium (URSI), Warsaw, Poland, 5-8 Oct. 2020, pp. 161–164.