The Coulomb counting (CC) method is the most widely accepted state of charge (SOC) estimation method in the industry. However, the cumulative error generated during operation is a huge challenge for the engineering application. A feedback regulation framework is designed to address this situation; however, the basic problem of this framework is that the error regulation occurs only after the error is generated. As a result, its initiative to suppress system disturbance is insufficient. To overcome this problem, an active disturbance rejection control–based-feedback-estimator is proposed in this paper. The regulation is designed based on the terminal voltage error between actual measurement and theoretical value. And active disturbance rejection control is employed to improve the estimation accuracy and adaptability. The power batteries’ SOC estimation in engine waste heat recovery system is studied in this paper. Compared with the traditional CC method and a proportional–integral (PI) feedback estimation method, the proposed active disturbance rejection control-feedback-estimator exhibits better estimation performance and adaptability to system disturbances and uncertainties. There are only three parameters , , and to tune, and estimation performance can be maintained without having to retune parameters when boundary conditions change, proving the effectiveness of the proposed active disturbance rejection control-feedback-estimator.
AppiahEWangSZouC, et al. (2021) A dynamic high-order equivalent modeling of lithium-ion batteries for the state-of-charge prediction based on reduced-order extended Kalman filtering algorithm. Available at: https://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JETP/article/view/56619
2.
CharkhgardMFarrokhiM (2010) State-of-charge estimation for lithium-ion batteries using neural networks and EKF. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics57(12): 4178–4187.
3.
ChenTHuoMYangX, et al. (2021) A fast lithium-ion battery impedance and SOC estimation method based on two-stage PI observer. World Electric Vehicle Journal12(3): 108.
4.
ChiassonJVairamohanB (2003) Estimating the state of charge of a battery. In: Proceedings of the 2003 American control conference, vol. 4, Denver, CO, 4–6 June, pp. 2863–2868. New York: IEEE.
5.
CuiXHeZLiE, et al. (2019) State-of-charge estimation of power lithium-ion batteries based on an embedded micro control unit using a square root cubature Kalman filter at various ambient temperatures. International Journal of Energy Research43: 3561–3577.
6.
GaoZ (2003) Scaling and bandwidth-parameterization based controller tuning. In: Proceedings of the 2003 American control conference, vol. 6, Denver, CO, 4–6 June, pp. 4989–4996. New York: IEEE.
7.
HanJ (2009) From PID to active disturbance rejection control. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics56(3): 900–906.
8.
JavidGOuld AbdeslamDBassetM (2021) Adaptive online state of charge estimation of EVs lithium-ion batteries with deep recurrent neural networks. Energies14(3): 758.
9.
JiangCWangSWuB, et al. (2021) A state-of-charge estimation method of the power lithium-ion battery in complex conditions based on adaptive square root extended Kalman filter. Energy219: 119603.
10.
JulierSJUhlmannJK (1997) New extension of the Kalman filter to nonlinear systems. In: KádárI (ed.) Signal processing, sensor fusion, and target recognition VI, vol. 3068. Bellingham, WA: International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp. 182–193.
11.
KuchlyJGoussianAMerveillautM, et al. (2021) Li-ion battery SOC estimation method using a neural network trained with data generated by a P2D model. IFAC-PapersOnLine54(10): 336–343.
12.
LeeJNamOChoB (2007) Li-ion battery SOC estimation method based on the reduced order extended Kalman filtering. Journal of Power Sources174(1): 9–15.
13.
LeiZXieH (2019) An active observer-based predictive energy management strategy for engine waste heat recovery system. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering31(3): 395–423.
14.
LeiZLiuTSunX, et al. (2021) Extended state observer assisted Coulomb counting method for battery state of charge estimation. International Journal of Energy Research45(2): 3157–3169.
15.
LiJYeMGaoK, et al. (2021a) A novel battery state estimation model based on unscented Kalman filter. Ionics27(6): 2673–2683.
16.
LiSHuMLiY, et al. (2019) Fractional-order modeling and SOC estimation of lithium-ion battery considering capacity loss. International Journal of Energy Research43(1): 417–429.
17.
LiSJuCLiJ, et al. (2021b) State-of-charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries in the battery degradation process based on recurrent neural network. Energies14(2): 306.
18.
LiYWangCGongJ (2018) A wavelet transform-adaptive unscented Kalman filter approach for state of charge estimation of LiFePo4 battery. International Journal of Energy Research42(2): 587–600.
19.
LiuXHeYZhengX, et al. (2017) A new state-of-charge estimation method for electric vehicle lithium-ion batteries based on multiple input parameter fitting model. International Journal of Energy Research41(9): 1265–1276.
20.
LukicSMCaoJBansalRC, et al. (2008) Energy storage systems for automotive applications. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics55(6): 2258–2267.
21.
LukicSMWirasinghaSGRodriguezF, et al. (2006) Power management of an ultracapacitor/battery hybrid energy storage system in an HEV. In: 2006 IEEE vehicle power and propulsion conference, Windsor, 6–8 September, pp. 1–6. New York: IEEE.
22.
MadonskiRKordaszMSauerP (2014a) Application of a disturbance-rejection controller for robotic-enhanced limb rehabilitation trainings. ISA Transactions53(4): 899–908.
23.
MadonskiRNowickiMHermanP (2014b) Application of active disturbance rejection controller to water supply system. In: Chinese control conference, Nanjing, China, 28–30 July, pp. 4001–4005. New York: IEEE.
24.
MengJRiccoMLuoG, et al. (2017) An overview and comparison of online implementable SOC estimation methods for lithium-ion battery. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications54(2): 1583–1591.
25.
MovassaghKRaihanABalasingamB, et al. (2021) A critical look at Coulomb counting approach for state of charge estimation in batteries. Energies14(14): 4074.
26.
ParkHSKimCEKimCH, et al. (2009) A modularized charge equalizer for an HEV lithium-ion battery string. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics56(5): 1464–1476.
27.
PengNZhangSGuoX, et al. (2021) Online parameters identification and state of charge estimation for lithium-ion batteries using improved adaptive dual unscented Kalman filter. International Journal of Energy Research45(1): 975–990.
28.
QianKLiuXWangY, et al. (2022) Modified dual extended Kalman filters for SOC estimation and online parameter identification of lithium-ion battery via modified gray wolf optimizer. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering236: 1761–1774.
29.
QingZZhiqiangG (2010) On practical applications of active disturbance rejection control. In: Chinese control conference, Beijing, China, 29–31 July, pp. 6095–6100. New York: IEEE.
30.
RenHZhaoYChenS, et al. (2019) A comparative study of lumped equivalent circuit models of a lithium battery for state of charge prediction. International Journal of Energy Research43: 7306–7315.
31.
SalkindAJFennieCSinghP, et al. (1999) Determination of state-of-charge and state-of-health of batteries by fuzzy logic methodology. Journal of Power Sources80(1–2): 293–300.
32.
SunDYuXWangC, et al. (2021) State of charge estimation for lithium-ion battery based on an intelligent adaptive extended Kalman filter with improved noise estimator. Energy214: 119025.
33.
SunFHuXZouY, et al. (2011) Adaptive unscented Kalman filtering for state of charge estimation of a lithium-ion battery for electric vehicles. Energy36(5): 3531–3540.
34.
VinotETriguiR (2013) Optimal energy management of HEVs with hybrid storage system. Energy Conversion and Management76: 437–452.
35.
WanEAVan Der MerweR (2000) The unscented Kalman filter for nonlinear estimation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 2000 adaptive systems for signal processing, communications, and control symposium (Cat. No. 00EX373), Lake Louise, AB, Canada, 4 October, pp. 153–158. New York: IEEE.
36.
WangQWangJZhaoP, et al. (2017) Correlation between the model accuracy and model-based SOC estimation. Electrochimica Acta228: 146–159.
37.
WangSFernandezCYuC, et al. (2020) A novel charged state prediction method of the lithium ion battery packs based on the composite equivalent modeling and improved splice Kalman filtering algorithm. Journal of Power Sources471: 228450.
38.
WangTChenSRenH, et al. (2018) Model-based unscented Kalman filter observer design for lithium-ion battery state of charge estimation. International Journal of Energy Research42(4): 1603–1614.
39.
WuZGaoZLiD, et al. (2021) On transitioning from PID to ADRC in thermal power plants. Control Theory and Technology19(1): 3–18.
40.
XieJMaJBaiK (2018) State-of-charge estimators considering temperature effect, hysteresis potential, and thermal evolution for LiFePo4 batteries. International Journal of Energy Research42(8): 2710–2727.
41.
XiongXWangSLFernandezC, et al. (2020) A novel practical state of charge estimation method: An adaptive improved ampere-hour method based on composite correction factor. International Journal of Energy Research44(14): 11385–11404.
42.
XuJMiCCCaoB, et al. (2013) The state of charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries based on a proportional-integral observer. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology63(4): 1614–1621.
43.
ZhengQGaolLQGaoZ (2007) On stability analysis of active disturbance rejection control for nonlinear time-varying plants with unknown dynamics. In: 2007 46th IEEE conference on decision and control, New Orleans, LA, 12–14 December, pp. 3501–3506. New York: IEEE.
44.
ZhengYOuyangMHanX, et al. (2018) Investigating the error sources of the online state of charge estimation methods for lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles. Journal of Power Sources377: 161–188.
45.
ZhouWZhengYPanZ, et al. (2021) Review on the battery model and SOC estimation method. Processes9(9): 1685.
