Artificial neural network–based modelling of pacemaker and its pace tracking using discrete wavelet transform–based finite dimension repetitive controller
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2024
Artificial neural network–based modelling of pacemaker and its pace tracking using discrete wavelet transform–based finite dimension repetitive controller
Efficient control of cardiac pacing is a very important aspect as it provides lifesaving regulated cardiac rhythm in this dynamic hostile environment. The foremost control objective is set to design a highly reliable and advanced control strategy to ensure the utmost accuracy in the control effort. A modified artificial neural network (ANN)–based modelling and pace tracking using finite dimension repetitive controller (FDRC) design based on internal model principle (IMP) has been presented here. This controller will not only provide accurate tracking but also minimize the control action time due to less amount of data handling through the deployment of discrete wavelet transform (DWT) in the loop of repetitive controller (RC). Finally, a case study has been propounded considering ANN model using available data sets and software to validate the control strategy and justify the control objective for optimizing the pace tracking in a pacemaker. Result of the experiment showed good accuracy as well as very low error in terms of mean-squared error (MSE), integral absolute error (IAE), integral time absolute error (ITAE) and integral time square error (ITSE). Along with that, it is observed that DWT not only benefits the handling of very less memory but also acts as an additional filter while reconstructing the signal, which serves as an added advantage of this model.
AstolfiDMarxSVan de WouwN (2021) Repetitive control design based on forwarding for nonlinear minimum-phase systems. Automatica129: 109671.
2.
BansalHOKumarRSinghRK, et al. (2012) Design of an intelligent PD controller for artificial pacemaker. In: 2012 2nd international conference on power, control and embedded systems, Allahabad, India, 17–19 December, pp. 1–4. New York: IEEE.
3.
CastroVJFMalathiR (2018) Design of advanced control strategies for cardiovascular system. Materials Today: Proceedings5(1): 1960–1966.
4.
ChenTDiciollaMKwiatkowskaM, et al. (2014) Quantitative verification of implantable cardiac pacemakers over hybrid heart models. Information & Computation236: 87–101.
5.
DeyNMondalUSenguptaA (2021) Adaptive repetitive control of peristaltic pump flow rate with an optical flow sensing system. In: DeyasiADattaAKDebnathPetal. (eds) Photonics, Plasmonics and Information Optics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 343–358.
6.
DeyRMondalUDharRS (2022) Application of internal model principle based plug-in repetitive controller in artificial cardiovascular system. In: SenBKonarDSharmaK, et al. (eds) Advanced Computational Paradigms and Hybrid Intelligent Computing. Singapore: Springer, pp. 365–371.
7.
FatoorehchiHGhorbanianSA (2019) Sliding mode control for heartbeat electrocardiogram tracking problem. Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering53(2): 265–272.
JiangZPajicMMoarrefS, et al. (2012) Modeling and verification of a dual chamber implantable pacemaker. In: FlanaganCKönigB (eds) International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems. Berlin: Springer, pp. 188–203.
10.
KararME (2018) Robust RBF neural network–based backstepping controller for implantable cardiac pacemakers. International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing32(7): 1040–1051.
11.
KhanPKhanYKumarS (2021) Activity-based tracking and stabilization of human heart rate using fuzzy FO-PID controller. IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Industrial Electronics3(2): 372–381.
12.
KoyamaTKobayashiMIchikawaT, et al. (2019) An application of pacemaker respiratory monitoring system for the prediction of heart failure. Respiratory Medicine Case Reports26: 273–275.
13.
KumawatAKRanaSSharmaA (2014) Design and implementation of PID controller for second order plant and comparison of its performance with fuzzy logic based controller. International Journal of Electronic and Electrical Engineering7(1): 19–24.
14.
LinCCYangCYZhouZ, et al. (2018) Intelligent health monitoring system based on smart clothing. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks14(8): 1550147718794318.
15.
LiuYYuanX (2021) Logic analysis of arrhythmia triggered by pacemaker special functions-an educational presentation. Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery36: 412–415.
16.
LovellNHClohertySLCellerBG, et al. (2004) A gradient model of cardiac pacemaker myocytes. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology85(2–3): 301–323.
17.
MéryDSinghNK (2012) Closed-loop modeling of cardiac pacemaker and heart. In: WeberJPerseilI (eds) International Symposium on Foundations of Health Informatics Engineering and Systems. Berlin: Springer, pp. 151–166.
18.
MondalUSenguptaADeyN (2018) Tracking of periodic reference signal: A parameterized finite dimensional repetitive control approach. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control40(13): 3640–3650.
19.
MondalUSenguptaAPathakRR (2014) DWT based repetitive controller for tracking of periodic reference signal. In: Proceedings of the 2014 international conference on control, instrumentation, energy and communication (CIEC), Calcutta, India, 31 January–2 February, pp. 17–20. New York: IEEE.
20.
MondalUSenguptaAPathakRR (2016) Servomechanism for periodic reference input: Discrete wavelet transform-based repetitive controller. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control38(1): 14–22.
21.
NazSRajaMAZKausarA, et al. (2022) Dynamics of nonlinear cantilever piezoelectric–mechanical system: An intelligent computational approach. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation196: 88–113.
22.
QuarteroniAManzoniAVergaraC (2017) The cardiovascular system: Mathematical modelling, numerical algorithms and clinical applications. Acta Numerica26: 365–590.
23.
SarkarSMukherjeeAMondalU, et al. (2022) Modified multiloop finite dimensional robust repetitive controller for supply air pressure loop of a heating, ventilation, and air conditioning system. In: BhattacharyaSBhaumikSChattopadhyayS, et al. (eds) Proceedings of International Conference on Industrial Instrumentation and Control. Singapore: Springer, pp. 41–51.
24.
ShiWV (2013) Advanced intelligent control of cardiac pacemaker systems using a fuzzy PID controller. International Journal of Intelligent Control and Systems18(2): 28–34.
25.
ShiWVZhouM (2011) Fuzzy pid controllers for dual-sensor pacing systems in patients with bradycardias at rest. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 1117–1122. IEEE.
26.
SraitihMJabraneYAtlasA (2021) An overview on intra-and inter-patient paradigm for ECG heartbeat arrhythmia classification. In: 2021 international conference on digital age & technological advances for sustainable development (ICDATA), Marrakech, Morocco, 29–30 June, pp. 1–7. New York: IEEE.
27.
SrivastavaRKumarB (2022) Design of Anfis based pacemaker controller having improved transient response and its FPGA implementation. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control71: 103186.
28.
WagnerPStrodthoffNBousseljotRD, et al. (2020) PTB-XL, a large publicly available electrocardiography dataset. Scientific Data7(1): 154.
29.
YadavJRaniAGargG (2011) Intelligent heart rate controller for cardiac pacemaker. International Journal of Computer Applications36(7): 22–29.
30.
ZhangHZhuRYuanH, et al. (2022) Harmonic current suppression for AMB system via the finite dimension repetitive controller. IEEE Sensors Journal22(7): 6995–7004.
