In this paper, a double-loop tracking control strategy with finite-time convergence is investigated for a switched-trajectory quadrotor subjected to gust winds in air–ground cooperation. To handle the complexity of switched-trajectory tracking, an adaptive tracking differentiator is presented in an outer loop to arrange transition processes. Fast integral terminal sliding mode control is also used in the outer loop to improve convergence speed and tracking accuracy. The gust winds are estimated and compensated by a nonlinear extended state observer and a nonlinear controller with finite-time convergence in an inner loop, respectively. Convergency analyses are presented with the double-loop tracking control strategy for the switched-trajectory quadrotor. Comparison experiments with existing studies show superior performances of the proposed control method for the quadrotor in air–ground cooperation under gust winds.
BishebanMLeeT (2021) Geometric adaptive control with neural networks for a quadrotor in wind fields. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology29(4): 1533–1548.
2.
CamachoASalaVGhorbaniH, et al. (2017) A novel active gate driver for improving SiC MOSFET switching trajectory. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics64(11): 9032–9042.
3.
CaoZChenXYuY, et al. (2020) Image dynamics-based visual servoing for quadrotors tracking a target with a nonlinear trajectory observer. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems50(1): 376–384.
4.
ChiuC (2012) Derivative and integral terminal sliding mode control for a class of MIMO nonlinear systems. Automatica48(2): 316–326.
5.
CuiLJinNChangS, et al. (2021a) Fixed-time ESO based fixed-time integral terminal sliding mode controller design for a missile. ISA Transactions125: 237–251.
6.
CuiLZhangRYangH, et al. (2021b) Adaptive super-twisting trajectory tracking control for an unmanned aerial vehicle under gust winds. Aerospace Science and Technology115: 106833.
7.
GuNWangDPengZ, et al. (2021) Observer-based finite-time control for distributed path maneuvering of underactuated unmanned surface vehicles with collision avoidance and connectivity preservation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems51(8): 5105–5115.
8.
GuoBZhaoZ (2011) On convergence of tracking differentiator. International Journal of Control84(4): 693–701.
9.
HanJ (2009) From PID to active disturbance rejection control. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics56(3): 900–906.
10.
HouQDingSYuX, et al. (2022) A super-twisting-like fractional controller for SPMSM drive system. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics69(9): 9376–9384.
11.
HuQJiangB (2018) Continuous finite-time attitude control for rigid spacecraft based on angular velocity observer. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems54(3): 1082–1092.
12.
HuQJiangBZhangY (2019) Observer-based output feedback attitude stabilization for spacecraft with finite-time convergence. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology27(2): 781–789.
13.
LiBBanHGongW, et al. (2020) Extended state observer-based finite-time dynamic surface control for trajectory tracking of a quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicle. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control42(15): 2956–2968.
14.
LiJSunTHuangX, et al. (2022a) A memetic path planning algorithm for unmanned air/ground vehicle cooperative detection systems. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering19(4): 2734–2737.
15.
LiJXiaYQiX, et al. (2017) On the necessity, scheme, and basis of the linear-nonlinear switching in active disturbance rejection control. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics64(2): 1425–1435.
16.
LiPYangHLiH, et al. (2022b) Nonlinear ESO-based tracking control for warehouse mobile robots with detachable loads. Robotics and Autonomous Systems149: 103965.
17.
LiSTianYP (2007) Finite-time stability of cascaded time-varying systems. International Journal of Control80(4): 646–657.
18.
LiangCYangK (2023) Adaptive nonsingular terminal sliding mode tracking control of quadrotor systems with mass uncertainties and input delay. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control45: 3031–3046.
19.
LiuCLuoGChenZ, et al. (2021) Finite-time convergent multiple disturbance rejection control for electromechanical actuators. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics36(6): 6863–6878.
20.
MengZRenWYouZ (2010) Distributed finite-time attitude containment control for multiple rigid bodies. Automatica46(12): 2092–2099.
21.
MinaeianSLiuJSonY (2016) Vision-based target detection and localization via a team of cooperative UAV and UGVs. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems46(7): 1005–1016.
22.
MuskardinTCoelhoANoceE, et al. (2020) Energy-based cooperative control for landing fixed-wing UAVs on mobile platforms under communication delays. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics5(4): 5081–5088.
23.
OhHKimSTsourdosA (2015) Road-map-assisted standoff tracking of moving ground vehicle using nonlinear model predictive control. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems51(2): 975–986.
24.
QiaoGSunMZhangR, et al. (2009) An improved self-adaptive tracking differentiator. In: International conference on information and automations, Zhuhai/Macau, China, 22–24 June, pp. 980–984. New York: IEEE.
25.
QiaoLZhangW (2019) Double-loop integral terminal sliding mode tracking control for UUVs with adaptive dynamic compensation of uncertainties and disturbances. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering44(1): 29–53.
26.
SantanaLBrandaoASarcinelli-FilhoM (2016) Navigation and cooperative control using the AR.Drone quadrotor. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems84: 327–350.
27.
ShaoSWangSZhaoY, et al. (2022) Fixed-time robust trajectory tracking control for quadrotor UAV with disturbances. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control45(7): 1213–1228.
28.
ShaoXLiuJWangH (2018) Robust back-stepping output feedback trajectory tracking for quadrotors via extended state observer and sigmoid tracking differentiator. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing104: 631–647.
29.
ShaoXLiuJYangW, et al. (2017) Augmented nonlinear differentiator design. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing90: 268–284.
30.
SongHZhangT (2016) Fast robust integrated guidance and control design of interceptors. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology24(1): 349–356.
31.
SuhailSBazazMHussainS (2022) Adaptive sliding mode-based active disturbance rejection control for a quadcopter. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control44(16): 3176–3190.
32.
TannerH (2007) Switched UAV-UGV cooperation scheme for target detection. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation Pp: 3457–3462.
33.
ThapaSBaiHAcostaJ, et al. (2020) Cooperative aerial manipulation with decentralized adaptive force-consensus control. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems97(1): 171–183.
34.
UllahSKhanQMehmoodA, et al. (2021) Neuro-adaptive fast integral terminal sliding mode control design with variable gain robust exact differentiator for under-actuated quadcopter UAV. ISA Transactions120: 293–304.
35.
WangSChenJHeX (2022) An adaptive composite disturbance rejection for attitude control of the agricultural quadrotor UAV. ISA Transactions129: 564–579.
36.
WangXTanC (2023) Output feedback active fault tolerant control for a 3-DOF laboratory helicopter with sensor fault. In: IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering. Epub ahead of print 26April. DOI: 10.1109/TASE.2023.3267132
37.
WangXZhaiWZhangX, et al. (2023) Enhanced automotive sensing assisted by joint communication and cognitive sparse MIMO radar. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems59: 4782–4799.
38.
XiaoXWangCYangY, et al. (2019) Autonomous tracking and landing of QUAV based on air-ground cooperation. In: IEEE 28th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 12–14 June, pp. 479–484. New York: IEEE.
39.
XiongJZhangG (2017) Global fast dynamic terminal sliding mode control for a quadrotor UAV. ISA Transactions66: 233–240.
40.
XuWJunejoAKLiuY, et al. (2021) An efficient antidisturbance sliding-mode speed control method for PMSM drive systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics36(6): 6879–6891.
41.
YangHChengLXiaY, et al. (2017) Active disturbance rejection attitude control for a dual closed-loop quadrotor under gust wind. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology26(4): 1400–1405.
42.
YehTWangL (2008) A study on generator capacity for wind turbines under various tower heights and rated wind speeds using Weibull distribution. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion23(2): 592–602.
43.
YuHMeierKMArgyleM, et al. (2015) Cooperative path planning for target tracking in urban environments using unmanned air and ground vehicles. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics20(2): 541–552.
44.
YueYYangHLiuF, et al. (2021) Cooperative control for multiple quadrotors under position deviations and aerodynamic drag. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing147: 107096.
45.
ZhaoLDaiLXiaY (2019) Attitude control for quadrotors subjected to wind disturbances via active disturbance rejection control and integral sliding mode control. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing129: 531–545.
46.
ZhaoLYangYXiaY, et al. (2015) Active disturbance rejection position control for a magnetic rodless pneumatic cylinder. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics62(9): 5838–5846.
47.
ZhaoLZhengCWangY, et al. (2021) A finite-time control for a pneumatic cylinder servo system based on a super-twisting extended state observer. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems51(2): 1164–1173.
48.
ZhuZXuDLiuJ, et al. (2013) Missile guidance law based on extended state observer. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics60(12): 5882–5891.
