Robot model validation

Abstract

Some initial results arising from a project involving robot validation are described. A theme of the project is that control, whether adaptive or non-adaptive, should be model-based; that is, the controller should contain a model of the dynamic system describing the robotic manipulator. Good control requires a good model, and obtaining such a model is the aim of the validation exercise. The paper focuses on validating models of three components of the robot system: link flexibility, DC motors, and manipulator dynamics. In each case, algorithms, simulation and experimental results are presented. The use of symbolic algebra techniques is emphasised.

Relationships with other area of control and systems theory are explored. In particular, the relationships with parameter identification and fault detection are noted.

Keywords

Model validation symbolic algebra system identification robotics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Atkenson, C.G. , An, C.H. and Hollerbach, J.M. 1985. 'Estimation of Inertial Parameters of Rigid body links of Manipulators', Proc. 24th Conf. on Decision and Control, Florida, USA.

Chen, Y. 1966. Vibration theoretical methods, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. Inc., Reading, Massachusetts, USA.

Gawthrop, P.J. 1984. 'Parametric identification of transient signals', IMA J Mathe Cont and Inf. 1, 117-128.

Gawthrop, P.J. 1987a. Continuous-time Self-tuning Control. Vol 1: Design. Research Studies Press, Engineering control series, Letchworth.

Gawthrop, P.J. 1987b. 'Robust stability of a continuous-time self-tuning controller ,' Int J of Adaptive Con and Signal Processing 1 (1), 31-48.

Gawthrop, P.J. 1988. 'Quantitative feedback theory and self-tuning control ,' in Proc IEE Conf 'Control 88', Oxford.

Han, J.Y. , Hemami, H. and Yurkovich, S. 1987 'Nonlinear adaptive control of an N-link robot with unknown load,' Int J Robotic Res.

Horowitz, I. 1963. Synthesis of feedback systems. Academic Press.

Isermann, R. 1984. 'Process fault detection based on modelling and estimation methods: a survey.' Automatica, 20, 387.

10.

Kawamura, S. , Miyazaki, F. and Arimoto, S. 1984. 'Bettering operations of robots by learning.' J Robotic Syst.

11.

Kawasaki, H. and Nishimura, K. 1988. 'Terminal-link parameter estimation of robotic manipulators . IEEE J of Robotics and Automation.

12.

Leary, J.J. 1988. Process monitoring and fault diagnosis methods using constraint suspension, D.Phil. Thesis, University of Sussex.

13.

Leary, J.J. and Gawthrop, P.J. 1987. 'Process fault detection using constraint suspension,' Proc IEE pt. D (Special issue on Artificial Intelligence) 134 (4), 264-271.

14.

Leonard, M. 1967. Analytical methods in vibrations, Collier-Macmillan Ltd.

15.

Li, X. 1989. Modelling and validation of robot manipulators, MSc Dissertation, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Glasgow University .

16.

Mayeda, H. , Osuka, K. and Kangawa, A. 1984. 'A new identification method for serial manipulator arms ', 9th IFAC Congr.

17.

Middleton, R.H. and Goodwin, G.C. 1985 'Adaptive computed torque control for rigid link manipulators' , American Control Conference, USA.

18.

Moler, C. , Little, J. and Bangert, S. 1987. MATLAB user's guide, Mathworks Inc. , USA.

19.

Rayna, G. 1987. Reduce: Software for algebraic computation, Springer Verlag, Hamburg, Germany.

20.

Unbehauen, H. and Rao, G.P. 1987. Identification of continuous systems, North-Holland.

21.

Walker, M.W. 1987. 'Estimating manipulator load mass properties', Proc IEEE Int Symp on Intelligent Control, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

22.

Young, P.C. 1981. 'Parameter estimation for continuous-time models - a survey ,' Automatica 17 (1), 23-39.