Lexical and referential influences on on-line spoken language comprehension: A comparison of adults and primary-school-age children

Abstract

This paper reports on two studies investigating children's and adults' processing of sentences containing ambiguity of prepositional phrase (PP) attachment. Study 1 used corpus data to investigate whether cues argued to be used by adults to resolve PP-attachment ambiguities are available in child-directed speech. Study 2 was an on-line reaction time study investigating the role of lexical and referential biases in syntactic ambiguity resolution by children and adults. Forty children (mean age 8;4) and 37 adults listened to V-NP-PP sentences containing temporary ambiguity of PP-attachment. The sentences were manipulated for (i) verb semantics, (ii) the definiteness of the object NP, and (iii) PP-attachment site. The children and adults did not differ qualitatively from each other in their resolution of the ambiguity. A verb semantics by attachment interaction suggested that different attachment analyses were pursued depending on the semantics of the verb. There was no influence of the definiteness of the object NP in either children's or adults' parsing preferences. The findings from the on-line task matched up well with the corpus data, thus identifying a role for the input in the development of parsing strategies.

Keywords

ambiguity resolution definiteness lexical semantics PP-attachment processing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altmann, G. & Steedman, M. (1988). Interaction with context during human sentence processing . Cognition, 30, 191–238 .

Anderson, A. H. & Boyle, E. A. (1994). Forms of introduction in dialogues: Their discourse contexts and communicative consequences . Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 101–122 .

Anderson, A. H. , Clark, A. & Mullin, J. (1994). Introducing information in dialogues: Forms of introduction chosen by young speakers and the responses elicited from young listeners . Journal of Child Language, 18, 663–687 .

Bard, E. G. & Anderson, A. H. (1984). The unintelligibility of speech to children . Journal of Child Language, 10, 1–18 .

Brown, R. (1973). A first language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .

Brown-Schmidt, S. , Campana, E. & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2005). Real-time reference resolution by naïve participants during a task-based unscripted conversation. In J. C. Trueswell & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds), World-situated language processing: Bridging the language as product and language as action traditions (pp. 153–171). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .

Clark, E. V. (1996). Early verbs, event-types, and inflections. In C. E. Johnson & J. H. V. Gilbert (Eds), Children's language, Vol. 9 (pp. 61–73). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .

Conti-Ramsden, G. , Botting, N. & Faragher, B. (2001). Psycholinguistic markers for Specific Language Impairment (SLI) . Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 42, 741–748 .

10.

Crain, S. & Steedman, M. (1985). On being led up the garden path: The use of context by the psychological syntax processor. In L. K. D. Dowty & A. Zwicky (Eds), Natural language parsing (pp. 320–358). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

11.

Epstein, R. (2001). The definite article, accessibility, and the construction of discourse referents . Cognitive Linguistics, 12, 333–378 .

12.

Felser, C. , Marinis, T. & Clahsen, H. (2003). Children's processing of ambiguous sentences: A study of relative clause attachment . Language Acquisition, 11, 127–163 .

13.

Ferreira, F. , Anes, M. D. & Horine, M. D. (1996). Exploring the use of prosody during language comprehension using the auditory moving window technique . Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 273–290 .

14.

Ferreira, F. , Henderson, J. H. , Anes, M. D. , Weeks, P. A. & McFarlane, D. K. (1996). Effects of lexical frequency and syntactic complexity in spoken language comprehension: Evidence from the auditory moving window technique . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 324–335 .

15.

Fisher, C. , Gleitman, L. R. & Gleitman, H. (1991). On the semantic content of subcategorization frames . Cognitive Psychology, 23, 331–392 .

16.

Fodor, J. D. (1998). Parsing to learn . Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 285–319 .

17.

Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 559–586). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .

18.

Garnsey, S. M. , Pearlmutter, N. J. , Myers, E. & Lotocky, M. A. (1997). The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences . Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 58–93 .

19.

Goldberg, A. (1999). The emergence of the semantics of argument structure constructions. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 197–212). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .

20.

Hare, M. , McRae, K. & Elman, J. (2003). Sense and structure: Meaning as a determinant of verb subcategorization preferences . Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 281–303 .

21.

Hare, M. , MacRae, K. & Elman, J. (2004). Admitting that verb sense into corpus analyses makes sense . Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 181–224 .

22.

Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979). A functional approach to child language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

23.

Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1985). Language and cognitive processes from a developmental perspective . Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 61–85 .

24.

Kidd, E. (2003). An investigation into children's sentence processing: A developmental perspective. Unpublished PhD thesis, La Trobe University.

25.

Kidd, E. & Bavin, E. L. (2005). Lexical and referential cues to sentence interpretation: An investigation of children's interpretations of ambiguous sentences . Journal of Child Language, 32, 855–876 .

26.

Kidd, E. & Cameron-Faulkner, T. (2007). The acquisition of the multiple senses of with . Linguistics, 45 (in press).

27.

Kidd, E. , Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M. (2006). Examining the role of lexical frequency in children's acquisition and processing of sentential complements . Cognitive Development, 21, 93–107 .

28.

Kucera, H. & Francis, W. (1967). Computational analysis of present day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press .

29.

Lapata, M. , Keller, F. & Schulte im Walde, S. (2001). Verb frame frequency as a predictor of verb bias . Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 419–435 .

30.

Lieven, E. , Behrens, H. , Spears, J. & Tomasello, M. (2003). Early syntactic creativity: A usage-based approach . Journal of Child Language, 30, 333–370 .

31.

MacDonald, M. , Pearlmutter, N. , Seidenberg, M. (1994). Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution . Psychological Review, 101, 676–703 .

32.

MacDonald, S. A. & Shillcock, R. C. (2001). Rethinking the word frequency effect: The neglected role of distributional information in lexical processing . Language and Speech, 44, 295–323 .

33.

Maratsos, M. (1976). The use of definite and indefinite reference in young children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

34.

Meroni, L. & Crain, S. (2003). On not being led down the kindergarten path . In B. Beachley , A. Brown & F. Conlin (Eds), Proceedings of the 27th annual Boston University conference on language development (pp. 531–544 ). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

35.

Ninio, A. (1999). Pathbreaking verbs in syntactic development and the question of prototypical transitivity . Journal of Child Language, 26, 619–653 .

36.

Saffran, J. , Aslin, R. & Newport, E. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants . Science, 274, 1926-1926 .

37.

Semel, E. , Wiig, E. & Secord, W. (1995). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals (3rd ed.). San Antonio: Psychological Corporation .

38.

Snedeker, J. & Trueswell, J. C. (2004). The developing constraints on parsing decisions: The role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing . Cognitive Psychology, 49, 238–299 .

39.

Snow, C. (1977). The development of conversation between mothers and babies . Journal of Child Language, 4, 1–22 .

40.

Spivey-Knowlton, M. & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints . Cognition, 55, 227–267 .

41.

Traxler, M. (2002). Plausibility and subcategorization preference in children's processing of temporarily ambiguous sentences: Evidence from self-paced reading . Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 75–96 .

42.

Trueswell, J. C. (1996). The role of lexical frequency in syntactic ambiguity resolution . Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 566–585 .

43.

Trueswell, J. C. , Sekerina, I. , Hill, N. M. & Logrip, M. L. (1999). The kindergarten path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children . Cognition, 73, 89–134 .

44.

Trueswell, J. C. & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1994). Toward a lexicalist framework for constraint-based syntactic ambiguity resolution. In C. Clifton Jr. , L. Frazier & K. Rayner (Eds), Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 155–179). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .

45.

Trueswell, J. C. , Tanenhaus, M. K. & Kello, C. (1993). Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19, 528–553 .

46.

von Berger, E. , Wulfleck, B. , Bates, E. & Fink, N. (1996). Developmental changes in on-line sentence processing . First Language, 16, 193–222 .

47.

Wilson, M. D. (1988). The MRC Psycholinguistic Database: Machine Readable Dictionary, Version 2 . Behavioural Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 20, 6–11 .