In this study, the influence of parental input on the acquisition of discourse connectives was investigated. Three factors were hypothesized to play a role in contributing to the course of language acquisition: first, an increase in age, and hence, an increase in conceptual abilities; second, short-term frequency effects (effects of parental input in the space of one recording); and third, long-term frequency effects (effects of the cumulative parental input over a longer period of time). The authors developed a growth curve analysis and used this to analyze data from a dense longitudinal corpus of a German boy aged 1;11.12—2;11.27. Results show that each factor has a significant effect on the acquisition of the German connectives aber `but,' damit `so that,' und `and,' weil `because,' and wenn `when' and should always be taken into account when studying connective acquisition. Furthermore, growth curve analysis promises to be an innovative tool to study factors influencing the course of language acquisition.
Abbot-Smith, K., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Exemplar-learning and schematization in a usage-based account of syntactic acquisition. The Linguistic Review, 23, 275-290.
2.
Aksu-Koç, A. (1998). The role of input vs. universal predispositions in the emergence of tense-aspect morphology: Evidence from Turkish. First Language, 18, 255-280.
3.
Behrens, H. (2006). The input-output relationship in first language acquisition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 2-24.
4.
Berman, R.A. (1996). Form and function in developing narrative abilities . In D. I. Slobin, J. Gerhardt, A. Kyratzis , & J. Guo (Eds.), Social interaction, social context, and language (pp. 343-367). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Bloom, L., Lahey, M., Hood, L., Lifter, K., & Fiess, K. (1980). Complex sentences: Acquisition of syntactic connectives and the semantic relations they encode. Journal of Child Language , 7, 235-261. [Reprinted in L. Bloom (1991). Language development from two to three (pp. 261-289). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.]
6.
Borovsky, A., & Elman, J. (2006). Language input and semantic categories: A relation between cognition and early word learning. Journal of Child Language, 33, 759-790.
7.
Braunwald, S.R. (1997). The development of because and so: Connecting language, thought, and social understanding. In J. Costermans & M. Fayol (Eds.), Processing interclausal relationships: Studies in the production and comprehension of text (pp. 121-137). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
Brown, R., Cazden, C., & Bellugi-Klima, U. (1969). The child's grammar from I to III. In J. P. Hill (Ed.), Minnesota symposia on child psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 28-73). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press .
10.
Chouinard, M.M., & Clark, E.V. (2003). Adult reformulations of child errors as negative evidence. Journal of Child Language, 30, 637-669.
11.
Clark, E.V. (2002). First language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Clark, H.H., & Clark, E.V. (1977). Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics . New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich .
13.
Clark, H.H., & Murphy, G.L. (1983). Audience design in meaning and reference. In J. F. LeNy & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Language and comprehension (pp. 287-299). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
14.
De Villiers, J.G., & de Villiers, P.A. (1973). A cross-sectional study of the acquisition of grammatical morphemes in child speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2, 267-278.
15.
Diessel, H. (2004). The acquisition of complex sentences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
16.
Evers-Vermeul, J. (2005). The development of Dutch connectives: Change and acquisition as windows on form-function relations. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation UIL-OTS, Utrecht University, Utrecht, LOT.
17.
Evers-Vermeul, J., & Sanders, T. (2008). The emergence of Dutch and English connectives: How cumulative complexity explains the order of acquisition. Journal of Child Language.
18.
Fienberg, S.E. (1977). The analysis of cross-classified categorical data . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
Francis, D., Shaywitz, S., Stuebing, K., Fletcher, J., & Shaywitz, B. (1996). Developmental lag vs. deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal, individual growth curve analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1, 3-17.
20.
Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel statistical models (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
21.
Hadley, P.A., & Holt, J.K. (2006). Individual differences in the onset of tense marking: A growth curve analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 984-1000.
22.
Huttenlocher, J., Haight, W., Bryk, A., Seltzer, M., & Lyons, T. (1991). Early vocabulary growth: Relation to language input and gender. Developmental Psychology, 27, 236-248.
23.
Kemper, S., Rice, K., & Chen, Y.-J. (1995). Complexity metrics and growth curves for measuring grammatical development from five to ten. First Language, 15, 151-166.
24.
Kidd, E., Lieven, E.V.M., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Examining the role of lexical frequency in the acquisition and processing of sentential complements. Cognitive Development, 21, 93-107.
25.
Krasinski, E. (1995). The development of past marking in a bilingual child and the punctual-nonpunctual distinction. First Language , 15, 239-276.
26.
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
McCabe, A., & Peterson, C. (1997). Meaningful `mistakes': The systematicity of children's connectives in narrative discourse and the social origins of this usage about the past. In J. Costermans & M. Fayol (Eds.), Processing interclausal relationships: Studies in the production and comprehension of text (pp. 139-154). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
Matthews, D., Lieven, E.V.M., Theakston, A.L., & Tomasello, M. (2005). The role of frequency in the acquisition of English word order. Cognitive Development, 20, 121-136.
29.
Menars, S. (2002). Applied logistic regression analysis (2nd ed.). Series: Quantative Applications in the Social Sciences, 106. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
Naigles, L.R., & Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1998). Why are some verbs learned before other verbs? Effects of input frequency and structure on children's early verb use. Journal of Child Language, 25, 95-120.
31.
Piaget, J. (1969). Judgement and reasoning in the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. [Translation of J. Piaget (1924). Le jugement et le raisonnement chez l'enfant. Neuchatel: Delachaux et Niestlé.]
32.
Rescorla, L., Mirak, J., & Singh, L. (2000). Vocabulary growth in late talkers: Lexical development from 2;0 to 3;0. Journal of Child Language, 27, 293-311.
33.
Rome-Flanders, T., Cronk, C., & Gourde, C. (1995). Maternal scaffolding in mother-infant games and its relationship to language development: A longitudinal study. First Language, 15, 339-355.
34.
Sanders, T.J.M., Spooren, W.P.M., & Noordman, L.G.M. (1992). Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse Processes, 15, 1-35.
35.
Sandhofer, C.M., Smith, L.B., & Luo, J. (2000). Counting nouns and verbs in the input: Differential frequencies, different kinds of learning?Journal of Child Language, 27, 561-585.
36.
Shirai, Y. (1994). On the overgeneralization of progressive marking on stative verbs: Bioprogram or input? First Language, 14, 67-82.
37.
Spooren, W., & Sanders, T. (2008). The acquisition of coherence relations: On cognitive complexity in discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 2003-2036.
38.
Stevens, E., Blake, J., Vitale, G., & MacDonald, S. (1998). Mother-infant object involvement at 9 to 15 months: Relation to infant cognition and early vocabulary. First Language , 18, 203-222.
39.
Tomasello, M. (2000). Do young children have adult syntactic competence ? Cognition, 74, 209-253.
40.
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
Tomasello, M. (2006). Acquiring linguistic constructions. In D. Kuhn & R. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 255-298). New York: Wiley.
42.
Valian, V., & Casey, L. (2003). Young children's acquisition of wh-questions: The role of structured input. Journal of Child Language, 30, 117-143.
43.
van den Bergh, H., Herrlitz, W., & Klein Gunnewiek, L. (1999). Cognitive co-ordination in foreign language learning: A sketch of a research paradigm. In J. Don & T. Sanders (Eds.), Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS yearbook 1998-1999 (pp. 20-33). Utrecht: Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS.
44.
van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (1996). The dynamics of composing: Modeling writing process data. In C. M. Levy & S. Randall (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods and individual differences and applications (pp. 207-232). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45.
Wijnen, F., Kempen, M., & Gillis, S. (2001). Root infinitives in Dutch early child language: An effect of input? Journal of Child Language, 28, 629-660.
