Largely based on observations of English-speaking children, investigators have proposed constraints on verb learning, e.g., syntactic bootstrapping, the principle of uniqueness, and innate semantic-conceptual categories. Children produce overgeneralization errors as they acquire verb meaning, and data from some languages reveal an intriguing asymmetry: children use intransitive verbs transitively, while seldom using causative-transitive verbs intransitively. This study presents experimental evidence corroborating the author’s earlier finding that Quechua-speaking children’s overgeneralization errors observe the same asymmetry. The transitive variants of change-of-state verbs were elicited from 30 Peruvian children, aged 2;8—4;11. The ensuing discussion considers how Quechua-speaking children recover from this pattern of overgeneralization in light of constraints that have been proposed for children acquiring English, which is typologically very different from Quechua.
Aksu-Koç, A., & Slobin, D. ( 1985). The acquisition of Turkish. In D. Slobin (Ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition (Vol. I, pp. 839-880). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Allen, S. ( 1996). Aspects of argument structure acquisition in Inuktitut . Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins .
3.
Berman, R. ( 1986). A step-by-step model of language acquisition. In I. Levin (Ed.), Stage and structure: Reopening the debate. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
4.
Bowerman, M. ( 1974). Learning the structure of causative verbs: A study in the relationship of cognitive, semantic and syntactic development. Papers and reports on child language development, 8. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Department of Linguistics.
5.
Brooks, P., & Zizak, O. ( 2002). Does preemption help children learn verb transitivity ? Journal of Child Language, 29, 759-781.
6.
Bunger, A., & Lidz, J. ( 2004). Syntactic bootstrapping and the internal structure of causative events. In D. Bamman, T. Magnitskaia, & C. Zaller (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 60-71). Cambridge, MA: Cascadilla Press.
7.
Cheung, S.L. ( 1998). Causative verbs in child Cantonese. In E. Clark (Ed.), The Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Language Research Forum (pp. 151-160). Stanford, CA: Center Study Language & Information .
8.
Clark, E. ( 1987). The principle of contrast: A constraint on language acquisition . In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 1-33). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Courtney, E.H. ( 1998). Child acquisition of Quechua morphosyntax. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona.
10.
Courtney, E.H. ( 2002). Child acquisition of Quechua causatives. First Language, 22, 29-71.
11.
Figueira, R. ( 1984). On the development of the expression of causality: A syntactic hypothesis. Journal of Child Language, 11, 109-127.
12.
Fisher, C., & Song, H. ( 2006). Who’s the subject? Sentence structure and verb meaning. In K. Hirsh-Pasek & R. Michnick Golinkoff (Eds.), Action meets word (pp. 392-448). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
Gordon, P. ( 2003). The origin of argument structure in infant event representations . Proceedings of the 28th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 189-198). Cambridge, MA: Cascadilla Press.
14.
Gropen, J., Pinker, S., Hollander, M., & Goldberg, R. ( 1994). Affectedness and direct objects: The role of lexical semantics in the acquisition of verb argument structure. In P. Bloom (Ed.), Language acquisition core readings (pp. 285-328). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
15.
Haspelmath, M. ( 1993). More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations . In B. Comrie & M. Polinsky (Eds.), Causatives and transitivity (pp. 87-111). Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
16.
Koontz-Garboden, A. ( 2005). On the typology of state/change of state alternations . In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2005 (pp. 83-117). Amsterdam: Springer .
17.
Landau, B., & Gleitman, L. ( 1985). Language and experience: Evidence from the blind child . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
Lefebvre, C., & Muysken, P. ( 1988). Mixed categories: Nominalizations in Quechua. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
19.
Levin, B. ( 1993). English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (1994). A preliminary analysis of causative verbs in English. In L. Gleitman & B. Laudau (Eds.), The acquisition of the lexicon. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
21.
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (1995). Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
22.
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (1998). Building verb meanings . In M. Butt & W. Geuder (Eds.), The projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factors (pp. 97-134). Stanford, CA : CSLI Publications.
23.
Loeb, D., Pye, C., Richardson, L.Z., & Redmond, S. ( 1998). Causative alternations of children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research , 41, 1103-1114.
24.
Lord, C. ( 1979). Don’t you fall me down: Children’s generalizations regarding cause and transitivity. Papers and reports on child language development (PRCLD), 17. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Department of Linguistics.
25.
Markman, E.M. ( 1992) The whole object, taxonomic, and mutual exclusivity assumptions as initial constraints on word meanings. In J. P. Byrnes & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Perspectives on language and cognition: Interrelations in development (pp. 72-106). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
26.
McKoon, G., & Macfarland, T. (2000). Externally and internally caused change of state verbs. Language, 76, 833-858.
27.
Moliner, M. ( 1992). Diccionario de uso del español (Vol. I). Madrid: Editorial Gredos, S. A.
28.
Montrul, S. ( 2001). The acquisition of causative/inchoative verbs in L2 Turkish . Language Acquisition, 9, 1-58.
29.
Naigles, L., Fowler, A., & Helm, A. ( 1992). Development shifts in the construction of verb meanings . Cognitive Development, 7, 403-428.
30.
Naigles, L., Gleitman, L.R., & Gleitman, H. ( 1993). Children acquire word meaning components from syntactic evidence. In E. Dromi (Ed.), Language and cognition: A developmental perspective (pp. 104-140). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
31.
Naigles, L., & Lehrer, N. ( 2002). Language-general and language-specific influences on children’s acquisition of argument structure: A comparison of French and English. Journal of Child Language, 29, 545-566.
32.
Peccei, J.S. ( 1999). Child language (2nd ed.). London and New York: Routledge.
33.
Peers, E.A., Barragán, J.V., Vinyals, F.A., & Mora, J.A. ( 1960). Cassell’s Spanish dictionary. New York: Funk & Wagnalls.
34.
Pinker, S. ( 1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
Pinker, S. ( 1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
36.
Pye, C. ( 1993). A cross-linguistic approach to the causative alternation . In Y. Levy (Ed.), Other children, other languages (pp. 243-263). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
Rispoli, M. ( 1987). The acquisition of the transitive and intransitive action verb categories in Japanese. First Language, 7, 183-200.
38.
Rispoli, M. ( 1991). The acquisition of verb subcategorization in a functionalist framework. First Language, 11, 41-63.
39.
Rispoli, M. ( 1995). Missing arguments and the acquisition of predicate meanings . In M. Tomasello & W. E. Merriman (Eds.), Beyond names for things: Young children’s acquisition of verbs (pp. 331-352). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40.
Shirai, Y. ( 1994). On the overgeneralization of progressive marking on stative verbs: Bioprogram or input? First Language, 14, 67-82.
