An important question in verb learning is how children extend new verbs to new situational contexts. In Study 1, two-and-a-half-year-old children were shown a complex event followed by new events that preserved only the action from the initial event, only the result, or no new events. Children seeing events that preserved either the action or the result produced appropriate verb extensions at test while children without this information did not. In a follow-up study, children hearing new verbs produced more extensions than did children hearing non-labeling speech. These studies suggest that attention to related events is helpful to young verb learners, perhaps because they structurally align these events during verb learning.
Akhtar, N., & Montague, L. ( 1999). Early lexical acquisition: The role of cross-situational learning. First Language, 19, 347-358.
2.
Behrend, D. ( 1990). The development of verb concepts: Children’s use of verbs to label familiar and novel events. Child Development , 61, 681-696.
3.
Behrend, D. ( 1995). Processes involved in the initial mapping of verb meanings . In M. Tomasello & W. E. Merriman (Eds.), Beyond names for things: Young children’s acquisition of verbs (pp. 251-273). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
Bloom, L. ( 1993). Language development from two to three. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Booth, A.E., & Waxman, S.R. ( 2002). Word learning is ‘smart’: Evidence that conceptual information affects preschoolers’ extension of novel words. Cognition, 84, B11-B22.
6.
Brown, A.L., Kane, M.J., & Long, C. ( 1989). Analogical transfer in young children: Analogies as tools for communication and exposition. Applied Cognitive Psychology , 3, 275-293.
7.
Childers, J.B., & Paik, J.H. ( 2009). Korean- and English-speaking children use cross-situational information to learn novel predicate terms. Journal of Child Language, 36, 201-224.
8.
Childers, J.B., & Tomasello, M. ( 2002). Two-year-olds learn novel nouns, verbs, and conventional actions from massed or spaced exposures. Developmental Psychology , 38, 967-978.
9.
Childers, J.B., & Tomasello, M. ( 2006). Are nouns easier to learn than verbs? Three experimental studies. In K. Hirsh-Pasek & R. Golinkoff (Eds.), Action meets word: How children learn verbs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
Echols, C.H., & Marti, C.N. ( 2004). The identification of words and their meanings: From perceptual biases to language-specific cues. In D. G. Hall & S. R. Waxman (Eds.), Weaving a lexicon (pp. 41-78). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
Fenson, L., Dale, P., Reznick, J.S., Bates, E., Thal, D., & Pethick, S.J. ( 1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59, v-173.
12.
Fisher, C., Hall, D.G., Rakowitz, S., & Gleitman, L. ( 1994). When it is better to receive than to give: Syntactic and conceptual constraints on vocabulary growth. Lingua, 92, 333-375.
13.
Forbes, J.N., & Farrar, M.J. ( 1993). Children’s initial assumptions about the meaning of novel motion verbs: Biased and conservative? Cognitive Development, 8, 273-290.
14.
Forbes, J.N., & Farrar, M.J. ( 1995). Learning to represent word meaning: What initial training events reveal about children’s developing action verb concepts. Cognitive Development, 10, 1-20.
15.
Forbes, J.N., & Poulin-Dubois, D. (1997). Representational change in young children’s understanding of familiar verb meaning. Journal of Child Language, 24, 389-406.
16.
Gentner, D. ( 1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In S. A. Kuczaj, II (Ed.), Language development, vol. 2: Language, thought and culture. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Gentner, D. ( 1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy . Cognitive Science, 7, 155-170.
18.
Gentner, D. ( 1989). The mechanisms of analogical learning. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 199-241). New York: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Gentner, D., & Markman, A.B. ( 1994). Structural alignment in comparison: No difference without similarity. Psychological Science, 5, 152-158.
20.
Gentner, D., & Markman, A.B. ( 1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52, 45-56.
21.
Gentner, D., & Namy, L. ( 2000). Comparison in the development of categories. Cognitive Development, 14, 487-513.
22.
Gentner, D., & Namy, L. ( 2006). Analogical processes in language learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 297-301.
Gleitman, L., & Gleitman, H. ( 1992). A picture is worth a thousand words, but that’s the problem: The role of syntax in vocabulary acquisition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 31-35.
25.
Graham, S.A., Williams, L.D., & Huber, J.F. ( 1999). Preschoolers’ and adults’ reliance on object shape and object function for lexical extension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 128-151.
26.
Gropen, J., Pinker, S., Hollander, M., & Goldberg, R. ( 1991). Affectedness and direct objects: The role of lexical semantics in the acquisition of verb argument structure. Cognition, 41, 153-195.
27.
Huttenlocher, J., Smiley, P., & Charney, R. ( 1983). Emergence of action categories in the child: Evidence from verb meanings. Psychological Review, 90, 72-93.
28.
Jones, M., & Conti-Ramsden, G. (1997). A comparison of verb use in children with SLI and their younger siblings. First Language, 17, 165-193.
29.
Landau, B., Smith, L.B., & Jones, S.S. ( 1988). The importance of shape in early lexical learning. Cognitive Development, 3, 299-321.
30.
Landau, B., Smith, L.B., & Jones, S.S. ( 1998). Object shape, object function, and object name. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 1-27.
31.
Maguire, M.J., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R.M., & Brandone, A.C. (2008). Focusing on the relation: Fewer exemplars facilitate children’s initial verb learning and extension . Developmental Science, 11, 628-634.
32.
Markman, A.B., & Gentner, D. ( 1993). Structural alignment during similarity comparisons. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 431-467.
33.
Namy, L.L., & Gentner, D. ( 2002). Making a silk purse out of two sow’s ears: Young children’s use of comparison in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 5-15.
34.
Pinker, S. ( 1989). Learnability and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35.
Roberts, K. ( 1983). Comprehension and production of word order in StageI. Child Development, 54, 443-449.
36.
Slobin, D.I. ( 1981). The origins of grammatical encoding of events. In W. Deutsch (Ed.), The child’s construction of language (pp. 185-199). New York: Academic Press.
37.
Tomasello, M. ( 1992). First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development . New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Tomasello, M., & Brooks, P.J. ( 1998). Learning to produce passive utterances through discourse . First Language, 18, 223-237.
39.
Waxman, S.R., & Klibanoff, R.S. (2000). The role of comparison in the extension of novel adjectives. Developmental Psychology , 36, 571-581.
