Language-particular or language-independent factors in acquisition? Children's comprehension of object pronouns in Dutch,French and German

Abstract

Children's comprehension of direct and indirect object pronouns in Dutch, French and German was studied in order to determine the role of language-particular factors in acquisition. The pronoun systems of the three languages differ on a number of dimensions that have been assumed to influence the acquisition process: the phonological proper ties of pronouns (clitic vs. non-clitic); the position of the pronoun in the sentence and the phrasal category in which the pronoun occurs: prepositional ([ppPREP[_NP[PRO]]]) vs non-prepositional ([_NP[PRO]]). A picture-matching task was used. Three age groups, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-old children, were tested. The results indicate that language- particular properties, at least in the part of the grammar investigated here, do not play the role assumed in some theories of language development, but that more abstract, language-independent proper ties of the pronouns, such as their function as internal verbal argu ments, are relevant for acquisition. Those language-particular factors which were observed are secondary and restricted to limited domains.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bruner, J. (1974). From communication to language - a psychological perspective. Cognition, 3,255-287.

Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of Language. Its Nature, Origin, and Use (New York: Praeger)

Clark, E. (1985). The acquisition of Romance, with special reference to French. In D. I. Slobin (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Volume 1: The data, 687-782 (Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum).

Cook, V.J. (1976) A note on indirect objects. Journal of Child Language, 3, 435-437.

Cromer, R.F. (1975). An experimental investigation of a putative linguistic universal: marking and the indirect object In Journal of Expenmental Child Psychology, 20, 73-80.

Deutsch, W. & Pechmann, T. (1978). Ihr, dir, or mir? On the acquisition of pronouns in German children. Cognition, 6, 155-168.

Friederici, A.D. , Weissenborn, J. & Kail, M. (1988). Phonological and Syntactic Aspects in Aphasics' Pronoun Comprehension: A Cross-linguistic Analysis. Mss. ( Nijmegen: Max-Planck-Institut fur Psycholinguistik ).

Geerts, G. , Haeseryn, W. , de Rooij, J & van den Toorn, M. C (eds) (1984). Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst (Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff).

Gleitman, L.R. & Wanner, E. (1982). Language acquisition: the state of the art In E. Wanner & L. R. Gleitman (eds), Language Acquisition The State of the Art (Cambridge, Mass.: Cambndge University Press).

10.

Kean, M.-L. (1981). Explanation in neurolinguistics. In N. Hornstein & D. Lightfoot (eds), Explanation in Linguistics ( London: Longman Group).

11.

Klavans, J.L. (1985). The independence of syntax and phonology in cliticization . Language, 61,95-120.

12.

Lambrecht, K. (1981). Topic, Antitopic and Verb Agreement in Non-Standard French (Amsterdam : Benjamins ).

13.

Mills, A.E. (1985). The Acquisition of German. In D. I. Slobin (ed.) The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition. Volume 1: The Data, 141-254 (Hillsdale, N.J. : Erlbaum).

14.

O'Grady, W. (1983) Indirect object structures and language acquisition . In J Morreall (ed.) The Ninth Lacus Forum (Columbia, SC: Hornbeam Press).

15.

Osgood, C.E. & Zehler, A.M. (1981). Acquisition of bitransitive sentences: prelinguistic determinants of language acquisition Journal of Child Language , 8, 367-384.

16.

Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1966). La Psychologie de l' Enfant ( Paris: Presses Universitaire).

17.

Roeper, T. , Lapointe, S. , Bing, J. & Tavakolian, S. (1981). A lexical approach to language acquisition. In Tavakolian, S. (ed.), Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory ( Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).

18.

Slobin, D I. (ed.) (1985). The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Volume 1: The data (Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum).

19.

Solan, L. (1987). Parameter setting and the development of pronouns and reflexives. In T. Roeper & E. Williams (eds), Parameter Setting (Dordrecht: Reidel).

20.

Waryas, C. & Stremel, K. (1974). On the preferred form of the double object construction . Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 3, 271-279.

21.

Wegener, H. (1985). Der Dativ im heutigen Deutsch ( Narr: Tubingen)

22.

Weissenborn, J. (1988). The Acquisition of Clitic Object Pronouns and Word Order in French. Syntax or Morphology. Mss. (Nijmegen : Max-Planck-Institut fur Psycholinguistik).

23.

Zwicky, A.M. (1985). Clitics and particles. Language , 61, 283-305.