The functional basis of referentiality: evidence from children's spontaneous speech

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between the functional characteristics of children's spontaneous speech and maternal-report measures of referential vocabulary at 50 and 100 words in 7 first-born middle-class children. Although evidence is found for functional differences between children which show continuity between 50 and 100 words, no relationships are found between these functional differences and corresponding measures of referential vocabulary. This suggests that the kind of differences identified in Nelson's original (1973) study may cut across rather than reflect differences in the pragmatics of children's speech, and also raises doubts about the widespread tendency to interpret variation in vocabulary composition in terms of underlying differences in language use.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Austin, J. (1962). How to do Things with Words ( Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Bates, E. , Camaioni, L. & Volterra, V. (1975). Sensonmotor performatives. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 21, 205-226.

Bates, E. , Bretherton, I. & Snyder, L. (1988). From First Words to Grammar: Individual Differences and Dissociable Mechanisms (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Dore, J. (1973). A developmental theory of speech act production . Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 35, 623-630.

—( 1974). A pragmatic description of early language development . Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 3, 343-350.

Goldfield, B.A. (1985/86). Referential and expressive language: a study of two mother-child dyads. First Language, 6, 119-131.

—( 1990). Pointing, naming, and talk about objects: referential behaviour in children and mothers. First Language, 10, 231-242.

Goldfield, B.A. & Reznick, J.S. (1990). Early lexical acquisition: rate, content, and the vocabulary spurt. Journal of Child Language, 17, 171-183.

Gnce, H.P. (1957). Meaning. Philosophical Review , 68, 377-388.

10.

Hampson, J. (1989). Elements of style: maternal and child contributions to referential and expressive styles of language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, City University of New York.

11.

McDonald, L. & Pien, D. (1982). Mother conversational behaviour as a function of interactional intent. Journal of Child Language, 9, 337-358.

12.

McShane, J. (1980). Learning to Talk (Cambridge : Cambridge University Press).

13.

Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38 (1-2, Serial No. 149).

14.

—( 1981). Individual differences in language development: implications for development and language. Developmental Psychology, 17, 170-187.

15.

Ninio, A. & Bruner, J.S. (1978). The achievement and antecedents of labelling. Journal of Child Language, 5, 1-15.

16.

Ninio, A. & Wheeler, P. (1984). Functions of speech in mother-infant interaction . In L. Feagans , C. Garvey & R. Golinkoff (eds), The Origins and Growth of Communication ( Norwood, NJ: Ablex).

17.

Olsen-Fulero, L. (1982). Style and stability in mother conversational behaviour: a study of individual differences. Journal of Child Language , 9, 543-564.

18.

Peters, A.M. (1983). The Units of Language Acquisition ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

19.

Pine, J.M. & Lieven, E.V.M. (1990). Referential style at thirteen months: why age-defined cross-sectional measures are inappropriate for the study of strategy differences in early language development. Journal of Child Language, 17, 625-631.

20.

Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

21.

Snow, C.E. & Goldfield, B.A. (1983). Turn the page please: situation-specific language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 10, 551-569.

22.

Tomasello, M. & Todd, J. (1983). Joint attention and lexical acquisition style . First Language, 4, 197-212.

23.

Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations ( New York: Macmillan).