This study was an initial effort to examine the applicability of Curriculum Based Measurement (CBM) procedures to measure reading in a language other than English and more specifically, in Hebrew. Participants included a sample of 458 students from grades 1-5 from three elementary schools in Israel, 416 from regular education and 42 students from grades 2-5 who were receiving special services in reading. Students were tested on CBM probes in the winter and spring of the 2002 academic year. Four characteristics of the CBM measure were evaluated: (1) concurrent validity with two reading sub-scales (decoding and comprehension) of the Kaufman-ABC that had been translated and normed in Israel; (2) student outcomes in reading fluency across grades and across time within grades; (3) ability of the measure to discriminate students with and without reading problems and (4) the sensitivity of the measure when used weekly for progress monitoring. Results indicated that moderate to strong correlation coefficients were evident between CBM scores and the K-ABC reading subscales except for grade 4 in the spring. Also, students showed increased growth across grades and across time within the school year, except for a lack of increase from grade 2 to 3 in the spring. Students receiving specialized help for reading scored significantly lower on CBM probes when compared with regular education students. Finally, a gradual week-by-week progress rate in the curriculum comparable to those found with CBM reading in English was also found. Results suggest that the oral reading fluency metric may be applicable to evaluating reading in Hebrew. Implications for the use of the metric in other countries and languages are discussed.
Baker, S. K. and Good, R. (1995) ‘Curriculum-Based Measurement of English Reading with Bilingual Hispanic Students: A Validation Study with Second Grade Students’ , School Psychology Review24: 561-578 .
2.
Baker, S. K. , Plasencia Peinado, J. and Lezeano-Lytte, V. (1998) ‘The Use of Curriculum-Based Measurement with Language-Minority Students’, in M. Shinn (ed.) Advanced Applications of Curriculum-Based Assessments, pp. 175-213. New York: Guilford .
3.
Bradley, K. L , Shapiro, E. S. , Lutz, J. G. and DuPaul, G. J. (1998) ‘Evaluation of Oral Reading Rate as a Curriculum-Based Measure Within Literature-Based Curriculum’ , Journal of School Psychology36: 183-197 .
4.
Central Bureau of Statistics, State of Israel (2000) Characterizing and Classification of Geographical Units by the Socio-Economic Level of the Population (Publication no. 13). Jerusalem: 1995 Census of Population and Housing Publications .
5.
Deno, S. L. (2003) ‘Developments in Curriculum-Based Measurement’ , Journal of Special Education37: 184-192 .
6.
Deno, S. L. (1985) ‘Curriculum-Based Measurement: The Emerging Alternative’ , Exceptional Children52: 219-232 .
7.
Deno, S. L. and Fuchs, L. S. (1987) ‘Developing Curriculum-Based Systems for Data-Based Special Education Problem Solving’ , Focus on Exceptional Children19: 1-6 .
8.
Deno, S. L. , Fuchs, L. , Marston, D. and Shin, J. (2001) ‘Using Curriculum-Based Measurement to Establish Growth Standards for Students with Learning Disabilities’ , School Psychology Review30: 507-524 .
9.
Deno, S. L , Marston, D. , Mirkin, P. K. , Lowry, L. , Sindelar, P. and Jenkins, J. (1982) The Use of Standard Tasks to Measure Achievement in Reading, Spelling, and Written Expression: A Normative and Developmental Study (Research Report No. 87) Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 227 129).
10.
Deno, S. L. , Marston, D. , Shinn, M. R. and Tindal, G. (1983) ‘Oral Reading Fluency: A Simple Datum for Scaling Reading Disability’ , Topics in Learning and Learning Disability2: 53-59 .
11.
Deno, S. L. , Mirkin, P. and Chiang, B. (1982) ‘Identifying Valid Measures of Reading’ , Exceptional Children49: 36-45 .
12.
Eckert, T. L. , Shapiro, E. S. and Lutz, J. G. (1995) ‘Teachers’ Ratings of the Acceptability of Curriculum-Based Assessment Methods’ , School Psychology Review24: 497-511 .
13.
Fonseca, V. (1996) ‘Assessment and Treatment of Learning Disability in Portugal’ , Journal of Leaning Disabilities29: 117-117 .
14.
Frost, R. , Katz, L. and Bentin, S. (1987) ‘Strategies for Visual Word Recognition and Orthographical Depth: A Multilingual Comparison’ , Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance13: 104-115 .
15.
Fuchs, L. S. and Deno, S. L. (1981) The Relationship Between Curriculum- Based Mastery Measures and Standardized Achievement Tests in Reading (Research Report No. 57) Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 212 662).
16.
Fuchs, L. S. and Deno, S. L. (1982) Developing Goals and Objectives for Educational Programs (Teaching Guide). Minneapolis, MN: Institute for Research in Learning Disabilities, University of Minnesota .
17.
Fuchs, L. S. and Deno, S. L. (1992) ‘Effects of Curriculum within Curriculum-Based Measurement’ , Exceptional Children58: 232-243 .
18.
Fuchs, L. S. , Deno, S. L. and Mirkin, P. K. (1984) ‘Effects of Frequent Curriculum-Based Measurement and Evaluation on Pedagogy, Student Achievement, and Student Awareness of Learning’ , American Educational Research Journal21: 449-460 .
19.
Fuchs, D. and Fuchs, L. S. (1986) ‘Effects of Systematic Formative Evaluation: A Metaanalysis’ , Exceptional Children53: 199-208 .
20.
Fuchs, L. S. and Fuchs, D. (1989) ‘Enhancing Curriculum-Based Measurement Through Computer Applications: Review of Research and Practice’ , School Psychology Review18: 317-327 .
21.
Fuchs, L. S. and Fuchs, D. (1992) ‘Identifying a Measure for Monitoring Student Reading Progress’ , School Psychology Review21: 45-58 .
22.
Fuchs, L. S. and Fuchs, D. (1998) ‘Treatment Validity: A Unifying Concept for Reconceptualizing the Identification of Learning Disabilities’ , Learning Disabilities Research and Practice13: 204-219 .
23.
Fuchs, L. S. , Fuchs, D. and Maxwell, L. (1988) ‘The Valididty of Informal Reading Comprehension Measures’ , Remedial and Special Education9: 20-28 .
24.
Fuchs, L. S. , Fuchs, D. and Speece, D. L. (2002) ‘Treatment Validity as a Unifying Construct for Identifying Learning Disabilities’ , Learning Disability Quarterly25: 33-45 .
25.
Fuchs, L. S. , Fuchs, D. , Hamlett, C. L. , Walz, L. and Germann, G. (1993) ‘Formative Evaluation of Academic Progress: How Much Growth Can We Expect?’ , School Psychology Review22: 27-48 .
26.
Fuchs, L. S. , Tindal, G. and Deno, S. L. (1984) ‘Methodological Issues in Curriculum Based Reading Assessment’ , Diagnostique9: 191-207 .
27.
Galagan, J. E. (1985) ‘Psychoeducational Testing: Turn Out The Lights, The Party’s Over’ , Exceptional Children52: 288-299 .
28.
Germann, G. and Tindal, G. (1985) ‘An Application of Curriculum Based Assessment: The Use of Direct and Repeated Measurement’ , Exceptional Children52: 244-265 .
29.
Glass, G. V. and Hopkins K. (1996) Statistical Methods in Education and Psychology, 3rd edn.Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon Press .
30.
Good, R. E. III , Simmons, D. C. and Kame’enui, E. J. (2001) ‘The Importance and Decision-Making Utility of A Continuum of Fluency-Based Indicators of Foundational Reading Skills for Third-Grade High Stakes Outcomes’ , Scientific Studies of Reading5: 257-281 .
31.
Hasbrouck, J. E. and Tindal, G. (1992) ‘Curriculum-Based Oral Fluency Norms for Students in Grades 2 Through 5’ , Teaching Exceptional Children24: 41-44 .
32.
Hartman, J. M. and Fuller, M. L. (1997) ‘The Development of Curriculum-Based Measurement Norms in Literature-Based Classrooms’ , Journal of School Psychology35: 377-389 .
33.
Hazany, I. , Peyser, M. , Shimborsky, G. and Wolf, N. (1995) Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children - The Israeli Version. Ministry of Education, Culture, and Sports - Psychological and Counseling Services, The Henrietta Szold Institute for Research in Behavioral Sciences .
34.
Hintze, J. M. , Callahan III, J. E. , Matthews, W. J. , Williams, S. A. S. and Tobin, K. G. (2002) ‘Oral Reading Fluency and Prediction of Reading Comprehension in African American and Caucasian Elementary School Children’ , School Psychology Review31: 540-553 .
35.
Hintze, J. M. , Owen, S. V. , Shapiro, S. S. and Daly III, E. J. (2000) ‘Generalizability of Oral Reading Fluency Measures: Application of G Theory to Curriculum-Based Measurement’ , School Psychology Quarterly15: 52-68 .
36.
Hintze, J. M. and Shapiro, E. S. (1997) ‘Curriculum-Based Measurement and Literature-Based Reading: Is Curriculum-Based Measurement Meeting the Needs of Changing Reading Curricula?’ , Journal of School Psychology35: 351-375 .
37.
Hintze, J. M. , Shapiro, E. S. and Lutz, J. G. (1994) ‘The Effects of Curriculum on the Sensitivity of Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading’ , The Journal of Special Education28: 188-202 .
38.
Hosp M. K. and Hosp, J. L. (2003) ‘Curriculum-Based Measurement for Reading, Spelling, and Math: How To Do It and Why’ , Preventing School Failure48: 10-17 .
39.
Israeli Ministry of Education (1996) Special Memorandum (no. 23) - Inclusion Allowance and Regional Support Centers for Students with Special Needs Who Are Included in Regular Education Settings. Jerusalem: Government Press .
40.
Kranzler, J. H. , Miller, M. D. and Jordan, L. (1999) ‘An Examination of Racial/Ethnic and Gender Bias on Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading’ , School Psychology Quarterly14: 327-342 .
41.
Loewenstein, M. and Kozminsky, E (1999) ‘The Effect of Morphological Transparency of Written Hebrew on the Efficiency of Reading’ , SCRIPT1: 127-135 .
42.
Marston, D. and Deno, S. L. (1982) Implementation of Direct and Repeated Measurement in the School Setting (Research Report No. 106) Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities .
43.
Marston, D.Fuchs, L. S. and Deno, S. L. (1986) ‘Measuring Pupil Progress: A Comparison of Standardized Achievement Tests and Curriculum-Related Measures’ , Diagnostique11: 77-90 .
44.
Marston and Magnusson (1985) ‘Implementing Curriculum-Based Measurement in Special and Regular Education Settings’ , Exceptional Children52: 266-276 .
45.
Marston, D. , Mirkin, P. K. and Deno, S. L. (1984) ‘Curriculum-Based Measurement: An Alternative to Traditional Screening, Referral, and Identification of Learning Disabled Students’ , The Journal of Special Education18: 109-118 .
46.
Marston, D. , Tindal, G. and Deno, S. L. (1983) A Comparison of Standardized Achievement Tests and Direct Measurement Techniques in Measuring Student Progress (Research Report No. 126) Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities .
47.
The Ministry of Education, Israel (1996) The General Director Memorandum, Special Memorandum, 23.
48.
Peterson, K. M. and Shinn, M. R. (2002) ‘Severe Discrepancy Models: Which Best Explains School Identification Practices for Learning Disabilities?’ , School Psychology Review31: 459-476 .
49.
Powell-Smith, K. A. (February, 2004) ‘Individual Differences in FCAT Performance: A National Context for our Results’ , paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Pacific Coast Research Conference, Coronado, CA.
50.
Shapiro, E. S. and Eckert, T. L. (1994) ‘Acceptability of Curriculum-Based Assessment by School Psychologists’ , Journal of School Psychology32: 167-183 .
51.
Shapiro, E. S. (2004) Academic Skills Problems: Direct Assessment and Intervention, 3rd edn.New York: Guilford Press .
52.
Shapiro, E. S. , Angello, L. M. and Eckert, T. L. (2004) ‘Has Curriculum-Based Assessment Become a Staple of School Psychology Practice? An Update and Extension of Knowledge, Use, and Attitudes from 1990 to 2000’ , School Psychology Review33: 243-252 .
53.
Shapiro, E. S. , Keller, M. , Edwards, L. and Lutz, J. G. (April, 2004) ‘Curriculum-Based Measurement Predicted Outcomes on High Stakes Testing - Reading and Mathematics Outcomes in Pennsylvania’ , paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association of School Psychologists, Dallas, TX.
54.
Shinn, M. R . (ed.) (1989) Curriculum-Based Measurement: Assessing Special Children. New York: Guilford .
55.
Shinn, M. R . (ed.) (1998) Advanced Applications of Curriculum-Based Measurement. New York: Guilford .
56.
Shinn, M. R. , Good, R. H. , Knutson, N. , Tilly, W. D. and Collins, V. L. (1992) Curriculum-Based Measurement Reading Fluency: A Confirmatory Analysis of its Relation to Reading’ , School Psychology Review21: 459-479 .
57.
Shinn, M. R. and Marston, D. (1985) ‘Differentiating Mildly Handicapped, Low-Achieving and Regular Education Students: A Curriculum-Based Approach’ , Remedial and Special Education6: 31-45 .
58.
Shinn, M. R. , Rosenfield, S. and Knutson, N. (1989) ‘Curriculum-Based Assessment: A Comparison of Models’ , School Psychology Review18: 299-316 .
59.
Speece, D. L. and Case, L. P. (2001) ‘Classification in Context: An Alternative Approach to Identifying Early Reading Disability’ , Journal of Educational Psychology93: 735-749 .
