Abstract
Core deficits in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) center around social communication and behavior. For those with ASD, these deficits complicate the task of learning how to cope with and manage complex social emotional issues. Although individuals with ASD may receive sufficient academic and basic behavioral support in school settings, supports for dealing with complex social emotional issues are more difficult to access, even though these issues significantly impact student learning. When addressing these challenging social- and emotional-based issues, school and professional personnel need more specific instructional skill sets and resources to effectively and compassionately support students with ASD. In this article, we address three challenging areas of social emotional development that are commonly experienced by individuals with ASD: Anxiety, social isolation, and grief. We briefly explore the existing research on these three topics, identify evidence-based practices and learning strategies to support social emotional learning in individuals with ASD, and include descriptive lists of practical resources that address anxiety, social isolation, and grief.
All individuals face the challenge of learning how to manage complex social emotional issues. Over time, we develop the resilience and skills to navigate life’s challenges, including shouldering stressful responsibility, meeting deadlines, coping with grief following the death of a loved one, repairing damaged relationships, and surviving traumatic events. However, we are not alone in meeting these challenging situations. We acquire social emotional skills through life experiences and with the support of peers, family, caregivers, and teachers. These key people help us to incorporate our personal strengths into adaptive coping and learning strategies (McCrimmon, Matchullis, & Altomare, 2016). This is a difficult process for most, but for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) the need for informed, individualized, and effective support is especially critical. Unfortunately, meeting the social emotional needs of this unique population may exceed the existing skill sets of many parents, educators, and school psychologists.
ASD and implications for addressing social emotional needs
Although each person with ASD is unique, there are common categories of symptoms that define the disorder (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2013). Key diagnostic markers include social communication deficits, reflecting difficulties with the give-and-take of social interactions (social reciprocity); difficulties with nonverbal communication behaviors (e.g., eye contact, gestures, facial expressions, and nonverbal social cues); and deficits in developing, maintaining, and understanding relationships. Additionally, restricted and repetitive interests and behaviors, difficulties with changes in routine, and sensory hyper- or hypo-sensitivity may also be present. Some with ASD also have intellectual disability and language impairment (APA, 2013). Without supports that are specifically suited for individuals with ASD, each of these challenging symptoms pose significant obstacles to social emotional learning.
As the global prevalence of individuals identified with ASD increases (Elsabbaugh et al., 2012), more diversity and a broader spectrum of symptoms and impairments are evident (Tager-Flusberg & Joseph, 2003). Additionally, regardless of their unique symptoms, individuals with ASD face similar complex social issues, particularly in relation to anxiety, social isolation, and emotions associated with grief or loss.
For example, consider the case of Rajh, a 10-year-old male with ASD. Rajh has age-appropriate language and cognitive abilities, but needs behavioral support in school because of his heightened anxiety, typically triggered by changes in routine. Prior to this year, he reported being happy at school and home. However, this year his parents divorced. Additionally, he is noticing that classmates do not include him in games and conversations. He is also experiencing more bullying from his peers. Previously not easily provoked, Rajh is now aggressive with peers, hitting, pushing, and shoving when frustrated. These aggressive behaviors are noted across settings.
Rajh’s support needs are complexly intertwined—he is facing significant anxiety in everyday situations, he is experiencing social isolation, and he is saddened by his parents’ divorce. In addition to the supports he has typically received to help him cope with anxiety, he now needs targeted supports that address social isolation and grief and loss.
Anxiety and social isolation are frequently occurring issues for individuals with ASD. Researchers estimate that anxiety disorders co-occur in approximately 40% of individuals with ASD, though rates between 11% and 84% have been reported in community- and clinic-referred samples (van Steensel, Bögels, & Perrin, 2011; White, Oswald, Ollendick, & Scahill, 2009). Among the findings of The National Longitudinal Transition Study-2012 (NLTS-2012), adolescents with ASD reported low rates of seeing friends outside of school (29%, compared to 52% of all children with disabilities); and communicating with friends by text, social media, or phone (22%, 18%, and 20% for ASD compared to 54%, 43%, and 38% of all with disabilities). These data indicate much higher levels of social isolation for adolescents with ASD than for students with intellectual disabilities or multiple disabilities (Lipscomb et al., 2017). As such, response to loss (e.g., parents’ divorce, death of a loved one, separation from a loved one, etc.) may be magnified and complicated by pre-existing anxiety, social communication deficits, and social isolation.
Purpose and overview
Noting the complexity and interconnectedness of social emotional challenges associated with anxiety, social isolation, and grief, in this article we will address each of these topics. First, we will explore misconceptions about individuals with ASD; then, we will identify appropriate intervention strategies and supports that are grounded in research and practice. We also provide tables and appendices with resources to assist parents, teachers, and therapists (including school psychologists, counselors, and mental health professionals) in more effectively supporting the social emotional needs of youth with ASD. Although the majority of resources given are designed for individuals with some language abilities, many are adaptable for minimally verbal individuals.
Misconceptions about individuals with ASD
In this section we will discuss three common misconceptions related to the social emotional needs of individuals with ASD. These three misconceptions include the following: (a) anxiety is just part of ASD (Mason & Scior, 2004); (b) individuals with ASD don’t want friends (Autism Speaks Family Services and Science Dept. [Autism Speaks], 2017; and (c) individuals with ASD can’t express emotions and can’t understand the emotions of others (Autism Speaks, 2017).
Misconception: Anxiety is just part of ASD.
Anxiety is a general term encompassing multiple disorders with adverse emotional reactions to specific fears of real or perceived imminent threat (phobias), or anticipation of future threats in specific situations (social anxiety, separation anxiety), or sometimes less specific threats (generalized anxiety). In the presence of anxiety symptoms, individuals alter their behaviors, often limiting their ability to function (APA, 2013). Recognizing that individuals with ASD experience anxiety is not new, as Kanner (1943) observed that numerous children with classic autism had substantial problems with anxiety. However, until recently, the research on the relationship between anxiety and autism has been sparse. Mason and Scior (2004) postulated that diagnostic overshadowing (i.e., ignoring the presence of mental health symptoms because they seem to be part of another disability, in this case ASD) might have contributed to the delayed exploration of anxiety symptoms in individuals with ASD. During the past decade there has been a proliferation of research examining the manifestation of anxiety in individuals with ASD, including meta-analyses that show anxiety to be more prevalent (31 studies: van Steensel et al., 2011) and more elevated (83 studies: van Steensel & Heeman, 2017) in children with ASD, especially in children with higher cognitive function. Some of the most common anxiety disorders reported with ASD are generalized anxiety disorder, separation anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, and phobias (White et al., 2009).
Researchers have recently begun asking whether symptoms of anxiety are to be expected as an appropriate response to daily challenges or whether these symptoms are indicative of a comorbid psychological disorder in need of targeted intervention to reduce impairment (Kerns et al., 2014). If anxiety disorders and ASD co-occur as comorbid disorders, anxiety symptoms in individuals with ASD should match the symptoms of anxiety disorders as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders–5th ed. (DSM-5; APA, 2013). For instance, a child may be resistant to socially engage with same-aged peers for several reasons, including anxiety-related fears of being negatively evaluated by peers (i.e., social anxiety disorder), ASD-related social skills deficits, or an interaction of both disorders (Renno & Wood, 2013). Thus, there may be a two-way relationship between social anxiety disorder and ASD-related social skill deficits, as social anxiety could be both a result of and contributor to social awkwardness and avoidance of social interactions (Kerns & Kendall, 2012; White et al., 2009).
In a study of youth between ages 7-years-old to 17-years-old who were diagnosed with ASD, Kerns and colleagues (2014) observed traditional (consistent with DSM criteria) anxiety disorders in 48% of the sample. The anxiety symptoms were independent of ASD severity and were associated with well-known predictors of anxiety in youth without ASD (e.g., a more anxious cognitive style, sensory hypersensitivity), suggesting that traditional anxiety, as it presents in typically developing children, may also occur in individuals with ASD (Kerns et al., 2014).
Kerns and colleagues (2014) also found the presence of atypical anxiety symptoms, which were considered qualitatively different from the traditional anxiety disorder categories and were possibly linked to difficulties specifically common to individuals with ASD. Some examples of anxiety symptoms that would be considered atypical include excessive and interfering worries regarding schedule changes; specific phobias with an unusual focus (e.g., running water, men with beards); and consistent social discomfort and fearfulness, not stemming from the fear of negative social evaluation (Kerns et al., 2014). These findings illustrate both separate and ASD-specific anxiety types.
Researchers have noted that individuals with ASD develop anxiety for many of the same reasons that individuals without ASD develop anxiety disorders. Furthermore, family psychiatric difficulties—that may be transmitted by genetics, social-environmental factors, or both—may be risk factors that trigger and exacerbate anxiety in individuals with ASD (Kerns, Rump, et al., 2016). Age and developmental level should be considered, as Davis and colleagues (2011) demonstrated that the trajectory of anxiety symptoms in individuals with ASD approximates that of typically developing individuals (i.e., peaking in adolescence). Additionally, negative life events, difficulties with emotion regulation and hyperarousal, and skill deficits (e.g., deficits in social skills, daily living skills, and academic proficiency) may increase the likelihood of individuals with ASD developing anxiety disorders (Bellini, 2006; Kerns, Newschaffer, & Berkowitz, 2015; Kerns, Rump, et al., 2016).
Misconception: Individuals with ASD don’t want friends.
Despite central deficits in social communication in ASD, not all individuals with ASD experience negative social outcomes and require intensive intervention in school settings (Locke, Williams, Shih, & Kasari, 2017). Many individuals with ASD are capable of forming reciprocal friendships (Bauminger et al., 2008a, 2008b; Kasari, Locke, Gulsrud, & Rotheram-Fuller, 2011). However, the capacity to form friendships does not guarantee that these individuals are included socially by their peers (Locke, Williams, Shi, & Kasari, 2017). Locke, Ishijima, Kasari, and London (2010) found that individuals with autism can experience loneliness and also recognize the poor quality of their friendships.
Jones and Frederickson (2010) noted that those with ASD who were rated as having prosocial behaviors were not necessarily included in social interactions with peers. Some peers purposefully exclude individuals with ASD. For example, peer-bullying and a lack of education on the part of both typical peers and teachers have been identified as factors contributing to social isolation (Majoko, 2016). Ultimately, regardless of who is to blame, difficulty connecting with others leads to individuals with autism feeling lonely and socially isolated (Ozonoff, Dawson, & McPartland, 2002). For example, the NLTS-2012 reported 45% of youth with autism choose to do activities with their friends, and 76% report knowing how to make friends (both significantly lower rates than other disabled peers). Peers with intellectual disability (ID) reported similar rates of choosing activities with friends (48%), but more consistent, higher rates of weekly get-togethers (42% for ID versus 29% for ASD). Although those with ASD and co-morbid ID were not separately identified, 50% of the ASD sample reported difficulty communicating by any means (compared to 60% in the ID group) and similar rates of not being able to understand what people say to them (70% and 69%, ASD and ID respectively), so it is likely that the results reflect individuals across the spectrum of cognitive abilities. Taken together, these findings indicate that though many individuals with autism desire to have friends, they are not as successful in engaging socially with friends (Lipscomb et al., 2017).
Misconception: Individuals with ASD can’t express emotions and can’t understand the emotions of others.
Prior to 1960, minimal research was conducted on the effects of grief and loss (Forrester-Jones & Broadhurst, 2007). Grief is a complex emotion that manifests in different ways in children and adults. Symptoms may include behavior changes as well as attempts at emotional expression. Children and adolescents may grieve intermittently and can re-experience grief as they develop and gain more understanding (Himebauch, Arnold, & May, 2008). Very little research has been done on the effects that grief has on those with autism, so most information available is from websites or books from people who have worked with children with autism who are grieving. It is sometimes erroneously assumed that individuals with autism lack the ability to empathize with others and that they have no connection with or insight into their own emotions. Behavioral outbursts displayed during times of stress tend to reinforce this misperception. However, while those with autism might grieve in ways that differ from typical expressions of grief, researchers acknowledge that these individuals grieve (Lipsky, 2013).
At times, individuals with ASD might focus solely on their own schedule and routines and appear disinterested in the death of a loved one. However, during stressful times, routines may give them a comforting sense of order. The need for this order may dominate the thoughts of individuals with ASD and this preoccupation may give the impression that they are indifferent to the loss. In reality, this preoccupation may be their way of managing strong emotions associated with grief.
Following the death of a loved one or other significant loss, communication difficulties are common for individuals with ASD due to limited language abilities, a lack of social understanding regarding situations involving grief, and a lack of motivation to respond in a socially acceptable manner (APA, 2013). When general rules of social interaction are not followed, the individual may appear rude and disinterested. The individual may ask questions that seem awkward or inappropriate. Additionally, the individual may impulsively make comments without considering how these comments affect others. An individual with autism may have a difficult time interpreting others’ feelings or the way others are perceiving the situation. Likewise, others may misunderstand what an individual with ASD is trying to convey, due to distracting body movements and facial expressions that may be incongruent with the individual’s feelings (Helbert, 2013).
Strategies to support the social emotional needs of students with ASD
Providing social emotional supports to students with ASD is primarily a teaching/learning process. In addition to specific interventions (i.e., cognitive behavior therapy, social skills packages and peer training packages discussed later), several learning strategies have been identified as established interventions to improve outcomes for students with ASD (National Autism Center [NAC], 2015a, 2015b). Among this list are four strategies well-suited to social and emotional support that may be part of package interventions. These strategies include schedules, modeling, story-based interventions, and scripting, each of which can also be effective as standalone interventions across the spectrum of language and cognitive abilities. In the following paragraphs, these strategies are briefly described.
Schedules involve using a chart or list with pictures or words that show sequential activities or ordered steps throughout a discrete event (e.g., getting ready for school) or the entire day. Charts can be created to teach independence in routines or to decrease anxiety about a new situation (Knight, Sartini, & Spriggs, 2015). Using positive reinforcement, a child can also be taught to accept the unexpected by practicing (allowing for) at least one unexpected event each day, with a reward for showing positive or neutral reactions when the unexpected event occurs. For example, a schedule might prepare a child for an assembly at school or a field trip as departures from typical routines, or changes in routines, following a loss. Resources for schedules are included in Appendix A.
Our second strategy is modeling. In this strategy, appropriate, situation-specific, social behaviors are modeled on video by others or by the individual. Then, children watch the video. After watching the video, children practice the skills and receive feedback. Since the original research of video modeling conducted by Bandura, Ross, and Ross (1963), this technique has been strongly supported in the literature. This strategy is also effective with students with ASD, particularly when teaching a new skill (Bellini & Akullian, 2007). Some research has shown video modeling to be superior to live modeling (Charlop-Christy, Le, & Freeman, 2000; McCoy & Hermansen, 2007). Video modeling has also become increasingly affordable and accessible with rapid advances in technology and personal electronic devices (Kellems & Morningstar, 2012). Modeling can be used to show what to expect and what to do at a funeral or how to deal with bullying, for example. Modeling resources are listed in Appendix A.
Resources for social isolation: Supporting children with autism.
Resources were chosen by prioritizing those that were free or low cost, those available in multiple languages, those with established evidence base, or those commonly used in practice. Resources listed are available via Internet, online booksellers, website or other information about availability is provided. For additional parent, educator, and therapist resources that address social isolation, see Appendix C.
The last of the four strategies is scripting. Scripting involves practicing (in advance) what to say in common social situations. This advance practice helps individuals with ASD appropriately join social interactions (Bellini & Peters, 2008). Scripting may also help individuals with ASD to avoid saying impulsive and unintentionally hurtful comments. For example, when a peer is grieving the loss of a loved one, the individual with ASD will practice and deliver a scripted statement, such as ‘I am so sorry for your loss’. Resources that include scripting strategies are included in Appendix A.
Interventions for anxiety and ASD
Researchers have demonstrated that self-injurious behavior, depressive symptoms, parental stress, social skill deficits, and decreases in academic performance are associated with the co-occurrence of anxiety and ASD (Kerns, Kendall, et al., 2015; Sze & Wood, 2007). These difficulties, on top of difficulties associated with symptoms of anxiety, provide strong evidence regarding the need for anxiety-focused treatment in individuals with ASD (Kerns, Rump, et al., 2016). Moreover, researchers have demonstrated that without intervention, anxiety in individuals with ASD does not diminish, but extends across the life span (McNally Keehn, Lincoln, Brown, & Chavira, 2013). Importantly, Kerns, Kendall, and colleagues (2015) noted that interventions directed solely towards ASD might not adequately address the interaction of anxiety and ASD. Therefore, evidence-based treatments for the co-occurrence of anxiety and ASD are critically important.
Kerns, Wood, and colleagues (2016) noted that several characteristics of individuals with ASD—such as their social communication deficits, restricted and repetitive behaviors, limited insight, and unique expressions of anxiety—might lessen the effectiveness of standard practice cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for individuals with anxiety. Consequently, CBT protocols for anxiety have been adapted to more adequately address the needs of individuals with ASD and shown to improve symptoms in multiple randomized control trials and through meta-analysis (Spain, Sin, Chalder, Murphy, & Happé, 2015; Reaven, Blakely-Smith, Culhane-Shelburne, & Hepburn, 2012; Storch et al., 2013; Sukhodolsky, Bloch, Panza, & Reichow, 2013; Ung, Selles, Small, & Storch, 2015; Vasa et al., 2014; Wood et al., 2009; Wood et al., 2015).
A recent meta-analysis to examine the efficacy of 14 studies involving 511 participants with high-functioning ASD concluded that CBT was moderately effective for individuals with high-functioning ASD. Additionally, the researchers outlined the common components of CBT that were used across the studies included in the meta-analysis. These components included psychoeducation, creation of a fear hierarchy, exposure to feared stimuli, cognitive restructuring, relaxation techniques, and social skill development. Furthermore, in order to modify the protocols to better suit individuals with ASD, adaptations included the use of role play, visual aids, structured worksheets, social stories, video modeling, and a wide variety of reinforcement strategies (Ung et al., 2015). Along with these adaptations, other researchers recommend modifying CBT procedures to tap into special interests of individuals with ASD (Vasa et al., 2014) and slow down the pace of the CBT sessions to allow extra processing time for individuals with ASD and co-occurring intellectual disabilities (Spain et al., 2015). Additionally, the specific treatment protocols used across studies were based on treatment manuals. The effects of CBT adapted for individuals with ASD have been shown in the same magnitude as the well-established effects of CBT in typically developing individuals (Sukhodolsky et al., 2013).
Resources for anxiety: Supporting children with autism.
Resources were chosen by prioritizing those that were free or low cost, those available in multiple languages, those with established evidence base, or those commonly used in practice. Resources listed are available via Internet, online booksellers, website or other information about availability is provided. For additional resources refer to Appendix B.
Rosen, Connell and Kerns (2016) highlighted that CBT is a verbally demanding treatment and includes a focus on labeling emotions, abstract thinking, and verbal coping strategies (e.g., cognitive restructuring, problem solving). Considering these demands, CBT may be a poor fit for individuals on the autism spectrum who have lower verbal abilities. However, they provided preliminary evidence that behavioral treatments with lower functioning individuals with ASD are efficacious and might be a promising avenue for anxiety treatment for individuals who struggle with higher levels of symptom severity, intellectual disability, and/or significant language impairment. They summarized common treatment components across studies, including desensitization, reinforcement, modeling, and prompting.
Interventions for social isolation
There are two basic approaches to improve outcomes for individuals with ASD who are socially isolated (Kasari et al., 2011; NAC, 2015a, 2015b). The first is a skill-building approach to increase appropriate social interactions and motivations through direct instruction, social stories, and scripting (NAC, 2015a, 2015b). The other approach is to increase the capacity of peers to include students with ASD in age-appropriate peer activities (Kasari et al., 2011).
There are numerous published social skills intervention programs designed specifically to build social interaction and communication skills in individuals with ASD. Some, such as the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Program for the Education and Enrichment of Relational Skills, or PEERS(R) curriculum, have been researched as a stand-alone package (Laugeson, Frankel, Mogil, & Dillon, 2009); replicated by Schohl et al. (2014); and implemented across cultures and languages (Yoo et al., 2014). Although other curricula may not have this level of package-specific evidence, many programs incorporate established elements of effective social skills interventions. Programs that include the following evidence-based components are identified as established interventions: (a) group instruction with typical peers in the group; (b) clear, concrete social rules; (c) generalization opportunities (e.g., free time to play or talk, field trips, homework); (d) high interest, hands on, fun, age-appropriate activities; (e) self-monitoring of social behaviors; (f) video modeling and/or role plays; (g) social stories or social scripts; (h) structured and predictable sessions; (i) progression of skills with errorless teaching; and (j) positive reinforcement for demonstration of skills and ‘homework’ completion (Gresham, Sugai, & Horner, 2001; Krantz & McClannahan, 1993; Krasny, Williams, Provencal, & Ozonoff, 2003; NAC, 2015a, 2015b; Williams White, Keonig, & Scahill, 2007). Social skills intervention packages with these elements have been shown to increase communication skills, learning readiness, and play, while decreasing general ASD symptoms and problem behaviors. Social skills package interventions have also shown effects of decreasing socially isolating behaviors, such as engaging in restricted and repetitive behaviors and sensory or emotional regulation difficulties (NAC, 2015a, 2015b).
Peer training is also an established intervention for students with autism (NAC, 2015a, 2015b). Multiple approaches for changing peer behaviors have been shown to decrease social isolation in students with ASD. Kasari and colleagues (2011) worked with elementary-aged peers each week to teach strategies for involving students who were not included (without specifically mentioning students who were identified with ASD). During recess, trained peers were then observed. Observations and data indicated that trained peers spontaneously engaged with students with ASD and nominated these students more often as a peer they would like to play with or who was their friend (Kasari et al., 2011). Ochs, Kremer-Sadlik, Solomon, and Sirota (2001) found that when students (ages 8-years-old to 12-years-old) with ASD disclosed their diagnosis to peers, peers’ social support increased. Another approach with middle-school typical peers (ages 12-years-old to 15-years-old) was to include first person narrative information (self-introduction) about ASD. First person narrative information resulted in increased positive attitude about students with ASD (Campbell, 2007).
When implementing interventions that include typical peers, one of the more challenging aspects is finding typical peers who are able to attend the group. This difficulty is perhaps due to concerns about taking typical peers from class to participate in social skills interventions. To encourage parents and teachers to include typical peers, it may be helpful to cite Asmus et al. (2017). They found that typical high school peers engaging in peer support networks showed their own academic improvements following participation in social interactions with students identified with disabilities. To assist schools in implementing interventions to improve social skills specific to ASD, five resources are listed in Table 2. A more extensive list is included in Appendix C.
Additionally, Carter, Hughes, Copeland, and Breen (2001) found that in comparison to those high school students who did not volunteer, adolescents who volunteered in peer training programs experienced more growth in knowledge and willingness to interact with students with disabilities. Their research also indicated that peer training programs helped to reduce the social isolation of students with disabilities. Later research found that the proximity of a typical peer increased the frequency of social interactions and positive social skills of students with disabilities (Carter, Hughes, Guth, & Copeland, 2005). Finally, based on applied practice, Maich and Belcher (2012) outlined 10 principles for choosing bibliotherapy resources (picture books) to teach peers about ASD. Specific titles and resources are listed in Table 2 and Appendix C.
Interventions for coping with grief
The intersection of research on autism and grief is just beginning to emerge in the literature. Only one published article (not a research study) was found on supports for grief in children with developmental disabilities (Sormanti & Ballan, 2011) along with one unpublished dissertation which addressed grief in children with autism spectrum disorder specifically with a video game intervention (Johnson, 2016). Following a death or loss, an individual with ASD will face many challenging social situations: Others may attempt to offer the individual comfort; the individual may want to comfort others in their grief; in the case of a death, the individual may attend an open-casket viewing of the deceased loved one; and the individual may attend the funeral or memorial service.
According to Ozonoff, Dawson, and McPartland (2002), current research has shown that social scripts (scripting) can be useful tools for helping to prepare those with autism for unfamiliar social situations. This could be beneficial in preparing them for how to handle events relating to death. Scripts offer individuals specific phrases to use in these situations, which could offer the individual guidance for an event such as a funeral or memorial service. As individuals with autism may not have appropriate existing social scripts, this advanced preparation can help the individual feel more comfortable in their interactions with other grieving individuals. Social Stories™ (Gray, 2010) are designed to preemptively prepare the individual for typical social situations before encountering them. Ozonoff and colleagues (2002) state that rather than solely offering exact phrases to use in situations, social stories focus more on critical social cues, why people are behaving in certain ways, and why it is important to respond in a particular manner. For example, a story can be created (using any medium) to describe what can happen at a funeral, what will happen when people try to offer comfort, and what will happen at school when the individual feels the intense sadness associated with loss. Social stories have the added benefit of reducing anxiety by showing the child what to expect. Because social stories are designed for repetition, the stories could also offer comfort by reviewing what happened in the past (similar to a memory book), including the feelings and actions of people in the story.
Wharff (2015) stated that although those with autism benefit from advanced preparation for changes that might alter their normal routines, this is not always possible. When an unexpected event occurs (e.g., the sudden death of a loved one, divorce, a loved one moving away, military deployment) multiple unplanned changes in daily routines are inevitable. Following a death or substantial loss, life becomes chaotic. According to Helbert (2013), the ensuing disorder, confusion, and uncertainty often contribute to emotional outbursts. Anxiety associated with the uncertainty may be reduced by making a schedule of the altered routines, so the events of the day become more predictable.
Resources for grief: Supporting children with autism.
Case example
Returning to the case of Rajh, who is experiencing everyday anxiety associated with autism, increasing social isolation and bullying, and grief over his parents’ divorce, several available resources can help his family, teachers, and therapists to address his needs. Because of his age-appropriate verbal ability, he is likely to respond well to CBT techniques adapted for children with autism, including the support of modeling and the concrete visual models for linking feelings and thoughts to actions, such as those provided in The Incredible 5-Point Scale book (details about this resource are listed in Table 2). Using the scale format and/or the anxiety curve can help him learn skills to gain self-control and better regulate his emotions. Using these therapeutic and visual tools, he can be better prepared to use CBT coping strategies for anxiety when faced with changes in routine. As his feelings about his parents’ divorce overwhelm him, these same resources can help him to know what he can do to feel better. Rajh can also benefit from modeling as part of a social skills intervention group to improve his own social skill levels and allow him safe opportunities for supported, successful socialization at school. Individualized Social Stories™ and scripting can teach him specifics of what to do and say when he experiences bullying and social isolation. Finally, reducing levels of anxiety using schedules (e.g., days he will be spending at Dad’s or Mom’s house, how he will get to school, who will pick him up, and what will be happening each day) can reduce the overall burden of social-emotional stressors in Rajh’s everyday life.
Conclusion
The resources that are included in this article’s tables and appendices are offered to assist caring adults in supporting children with ASD who are experiencing anxiety, social isolation, and grief. Many individuals with ASD experience anxiety and social isolation on a regular basis. Additionally, although a universal experience, grief is complicated by deficits in social communication and emotional understanding that are inherent in ASD. Intervention packages (i.e., CBT, social skills instruction, and peer training) can make use of established strategies such as schedules, modeling, story-based interventions, and scripting to specifically increase social emotional understanding and skill in individuals with ASD. Caregivers, educators, mental health professionals, and peers can provide needed support as individuals with ASD learn strategies for understanding and coping with complex social emotional issues.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
