The evaluation of the air quality in light shafts requires a specific study of its air renewal ability due to building shape, dimensions and other external conditions. This research has studied the capacity of light shafts to provide natural ventilation through the air change efficiency concept. A methodology based on the limitation of the computational urban domain is used to adapt the indoor air change efficiency index for outdoor environments. Numerical simulations were performed using CFD and a model that was experimentally validated.
The aim is to evaluate the effect of the centreline building width and light shaft dimensions in the air change quality within several wind climates. Results would provide a numerically proven tool for designers, summarised in some design-based strategies in order to select which one improves the air change quality.
The results indicate that the light shaft dimension perpendicular to the wind direction has a negligible effect on efficiency. For the range of wind velocities studied (0.75–9.00 m/s), the efficiency decreases at higher velocities, up to −7.41% with respect to the mean. For variations in the wind velocity and the centreline building width, a mean variation of ± 18.77% in the efficiency is obtained.
Practical applications: The present methodology defines a proceeding to numerically evaluate the air change efficiency in light shafts inside different dimensional cases of buildings within several urban wind conditions.
Awbi HB. Ventilation of Buildings. 2nd ed. London: Taylor & Francis – Spon Press, 1991.
2.
Walker RR, Shao L and Woolliscroft M. Natural ventilation via courtyards: theory & measurements. In: 14th AIVC Conference “Energy Impact of Ventilation and Air Infiltration,” Copenhagen, Denmark, 21–23 September 1993.
3.
Padilla-MarcosMAFeijó-MuñozJMeissA. Confined-air quality based on the geometric efficiency of urban outdoor spaces. Cases study. Int J Vent2016; 15: 15–30.
4.
SuttonOG. Micrometeorology. Quart J R Med Soc1953; 79: 457–457.
5.
BuccolieriRSandbergMdi SabatinoS. City breathability and its link to pollutant concentration distribution within urban-like geometries. Atmos Environ2010; 44: 1894–1903.
6.
Padilla-MarcosMAFeijó-MuñozJMeissA. Wind velocity effects on the quality and efficiency of ventilation in the modelling of outdoor spaces. Case studies. Build Serv Eng Res Technol2016; 37: 33–50.
7.
Padilla-MarcosMAFeijó-MuñozJMeissA. Eficiencia isoterma de los modelos de ventilación exterior en patios de edificios residenciales. Estudio de casos. Informes de la Construcción2015; 67: 1–12.
8.
Hussain M and Lee BM. An investigation of wind forces on three dimensional roughness elements in a simulated atmospheric boundary layer. Part. 1. Flow Over Isolated Roughness Elements and the Influence of Upstream Fetch. Report, University of Sheffield, UK, July 1980.
9.
SuttonOG. The logarithmic law of wind structure near the ground. Quart J R Med Soc1936; 62: 124–127.
10.
SuttonOG. The logarithmic law of wind structure near the ground. Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society1937; 63: 105–107.
11.
SharplesSBensalemR. Airflow in courtyard and atrium buildings in the urban environment: a wind tunnel study. Solar Energ2001; 70: 237–244.
12.
Teleman EC, Silion R, Axinte E, et al. Dispersion around buildings. In: Turbulence scales simulations in atmospheric boundary layer wind tunnels. Universitatea Tehnică “Gheorghe Asach” din Iaşi, vol. 44, 2008, pp.1–8.
13.
Cermak JE and Isyumov N. Dispersion around buildings. In: Wind tunnel studies of buildings and structures. Aerospace Division of ASCE, 1999, pp.37–40.
14.
LaunderBESpaldingDB. The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng1974; 3: 269–289.
15.
SuttonOG. The application to micrometeorology of the theory of turbulent flow over rough surfaces. Quart J R Med Soc1949; 75: 335–350.
16.
ShihTHLiouWWShabbirA. A new k-ɛ eddy viscosity model for high Reynolds number turbulent flows—model development and validation. Comput Fluid1995; 24: 227–238.
17.
BuccolieriRSandbergMdi SabatinoS. An application of ventilation efficiency concepts to the analysis of building density effects on urban flow and pollutant concentration. Int J Environ Pollut2011; 47: 248–256.
18.
BadyMKatoSHuangH. Towards the application of indoor ventilation efficiency indices to evaluate the air quality of urban areas. Build Environ2008; 43: 1991–2004.
19.
SpaldingDB. A note on mean residence-times in steady flows of arbitrary complexity. Chem Eng Sci1958; 9: 74–77.
20.
SandbergMSjöbergM. The use of moments for assessing air quality in ventilated rooms. Build Environ1983; 18: 181–197.
21.
ChenMSKFanLTHwangCL. Air flow models in a confined space a study in age distribution. Build Sci1969; 4: 133–143.
22.
HangJSandbergMLiY. Age of air and air exchange efficiency in idealized city models. Build Environ2009; 44: 1714–1723.
23.
Kastner-KleinPBerkowiczRBritterR. The influence of street architecture on flow and dispersion in street canyons. Meteorol Atmos Phys2004; 87: 121–131.
24.
WangJZhangX. Method to assess quality and quantity of outdoor ventilation airflow received by occupants. HVAC&R Res2011; 17: 465–475.
25.
SandbergM. What is ventilation efficiency?Build Environ1981; 16: 123–135.
26.
HangJSandbergMLiY. Effect of urban morphology on wind condition in idealized city models. Atmos Environ2009; 43: 869–878.
27.
LiXXLiuCHLeungDYC. Development of a k-e model for the determination of air exchange rates for street canyons. Atmos Environ2005; 39: 7285–7296.
28.
JongenT. Extension of the age-of-fluid method to unsteady and closed-flow systems. Am Inst Chem Eng (AIChE)2004; 50: 2020–2037.
29.
UeharaKMurakamiSOikawaS. Wind tunnel experiments on how thermal stratifcation afects flow in and above urban street canyons. Atmos Environ2000; 34: 1553–1562.
30.
MuhaisenAS. Shading simulation of the courtyard form in different climatic regions. Build Environ2006; 41: 1731–1741.
31.
YangXLiYYangL. Predicting and understanding temporal 3D exterior surface temperature distribution in an ideal courtyard. Build Environ2012; 57: 38–48.
32.
HertwigDEfthimiouGCBartzisJG. CFD-RANS model validation of turbulent flow in a semi-idealized urban canopy. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2012; 111: 61–72.
33.
Shao L, Walker RR and Woolliscroft M. Natural ventilation via courtyards: the application of CFD. In: 14th AIVC Conference “Energy Impact of Ventilation and Air Infiltration”, Copenhagen, Denmark, 21–23 September 1993, pp.393–403.
34.
SapianAR. Validation of the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method for predicting wind flow around a high-rise building (HRB) in an urban boundary layer condition. J Constr Dev Ctries2009; 14: 1–20.
BaikJJKimJJFernandoHJS. A CFD model for simulating urban flow and dispersion. J Appl Meteorol Climatol2003; 42: 1636–1648.
37.
SantiagoJLMartilliAMartínF. CFD simulation of airflow over a regular array of cubes. Part I: three-dimensional simulation of the flow and validation with wind-tunnel measurements. Bound-Layer Meteorol2007; 122: 609–634.
38.
MurakamiSHayashiY. 3-D numerical simulation of airflow around a cubic model by means of the k-e model. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn1988; 31: 283–303.
39.
BaskaranAStathopoulosT. Influence of computational parameters on evaluation of wind effects on the building envelope. Build Environ1992; 27: 39–49.
40.
ByrneCEIHoldoAE. Effects of increased geometric complexity on the comparison between computational and experimental simulations. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn1998; 73: 159–179.
41.
LienFSYeeE. Numerical modelling of the turbulent flow developing within and over a 3-d building array, part I: a high-resolution Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes approach. Bound-Layer Meteorol2004; 112: 427–466.
42.
HangJLiYSandbergM. Experimental and numerical studies of flows through and within high-rise building arrays and their link to ventilation strategy. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2011; 99: 1036–1055.
43.
Padilla-Marcos MA. Desarrollo de modelos de aplicación arquitectónica para el diseño de espacios exteriores eficientes para la ventilación de los edificios. PhD Thesis, Universidad de Valladolid, Spain, 2015.
44.
Li J and Ward IC. Developing computational fluid dynamics conditions for urban natural ventilation study. In: Building Simulation Conference (IBPSA), Beijing, China, 3–6 September 2007, pp.1090–1096.
45.
AldawoudAClarkR. Comparative analysis of energy performance between courtyard and atrium in buildings. Energ Build2008; 40: 209–214.
46.
AldawoudA. The influence of the atrium geometry on the building energy performance. Energ Build2013; 57: 1–5.
47.
RichardsPJHoxeyRP. Appropriate boundary conditions for computational wind engineering models using the k-E turbulence model. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn1993; 46–47: 145–153.
48.
StathopoulosTBaskaranA. Boundary treatment for the computation of three-dimensional wind flow conditions around a building. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn1990; 35: 177–200.
49.
HallDJWalkerSSpantonAM. Dispersion from courtyards and other enclosed spaces. Atmos Environ1999; 33: 1187–1203.
50.
BaetkeFWernerH. Numerical simulation of turbulent flow over surface-mounted obstacles with sharp edges and corners. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn1990; 35: 129–147.
51.
BlockenBCarmelietJStathopoulosT. CFD evaluation of wind speed conditions in passages between parallel buildings—effect of wall-function roughness modifications for the atmospheric boundary layer flow. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2007; 95: 941–962.
52.
VardoulakisSFisherBEAPericleousKGonzalez-FlescaN. Modelling air quality in street canyons: a review. Atmos Environ2003; 37: 155–182.
