Water and energy saving potential by adopting pressure-reducing measures in high-rise building: A case analysis

Abstract

Indoor domestic water demands are increasing rapidly in many cities of China, among the causes, water wastage due to overpressure outflow (OPO) at water distribution points in buildings, especially in high-rise buildings, is a factor that has not gained much attention. Field tests in 23 high-rise public buildings and laboratory tests were conducted to quantitatively evaluate the influence of water pressure on water consumption in buildings. The water-saving potential by adopting pressure reducing measures was theoretically analyzed and verified based on a case study. Results indicated that water consumption is closely related to water pressure and overpressure outflow is a very common culprit of water wastage in high-rise buildings. Pressure management measures, such as branch pipe pressure-reducing valves, can reduce water consumption in buildings and improve the comfortability of use as well. Based on the laboratory pressure–outflow characteristics study of different water appliances, water-saving potential of pressure reducing measures can be theoretically evaluated. Case study demonstrated a theoretical reduction of 19.4% in water consumption by adopting branch pipe pressure-reducing valves, an actual 14,773 m³ water (11.9% reduction) and 15,955 kWh embodied energy was saved in 2015 after the implementation of branch pipe pressure-reducing valves retrofitting measure. Therefore, despite the current measures of adopting high-efficiency water appliances and/or utilization of unconventional water resources in buildings, implementation of pressure management measures is highly recommended in designing water supply system for new high-rise buildings and reconstruction of water supply system in existing high-rise buildings, thereby, promoting water, energy saving, and development of green building.

Practical application: Water and energy saving in building is gaining more and more attention, however, water wastage due to overpressure outflow in buildings has not gained much attention. Based on field and laboratory tests, the water and energy saving potential in building water supply system were evaluated theoretically and further verified by a case study. Results indicate that pressure management measures such as branch pipe pressure reducing valves (PRVs) can reduce water and energy consumption in buildings. We strongly suggest that pressure management measures should be implemented in buildings, thereby, promoting water, energy saving, and development of green building.

Keywords

Water saving overpressure outflow pressure-reducing measure high-rise building outflow characteristics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Friedler

Hadari

. Economic feasibility of on-site greywater reuse in multi-storey buildings. Desalination 2006; 190: 221–234.

Liu

Yao

Gao

. Trend and driving forces of water consumed structure changes in Beijing. Res Sci 2003; 25: 38–43. (in Chinese).

Cheng

Peng

et al.

Evaluation of water efficiency in Green Building in Taiwan. Water 2016; 8: 236–236.

Proença

Ghisi

. Assessment of potable water savings in office buildings considering embodied energy. Water Resour Manag 2012; 27: 581–599.

Escrivá-Escrivá

. Basic actions to improve energy efficiency in commercial buildings in operation. Energ Build 2011; 43: 3106–3111.

Coelho

Andrade-Campos

. Efficiency achievement in water supply systems—a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2014; 30: 59–84.

Plappally

. Energy requirements for water production, treatment, end use, reclamation, and disposal. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2012; 16: 4818–4848.

Ghisi

Rupp

Triska

. Comparing indicators to rank strategies to save potable water in buildings. Resour Conserv Recy 2014; 87: 137–144.

Rahman

Keane

Imteaz

. Rainwater harvesting in Greater Sydney: water savings, reliability and economic benefits. Resour Conserv Recy 2012; 61: 16–21.

10.

Ward

Memon

Butler

. Performance of a large building rainwater harvesting system. Water Res 2012; 46: 5127–5134.

11.

Cheng

. Study of the inter-relationship between water use and energy conservation for a building. Energ Build 2002; 34: 261–266.

12.

Cheung

Mui

Wong

. Energy efficiency of elevated water supply tanks for high-rise buildings. Appl Energ 2013; 103: 685–691.

13.

Lee

Tansel

Balbin

. Urban Sustainability incentives for residential water conservation: adoption of multiple high efficiency appliances. Water Resour Manag 2013; 27: 2531–2540.

14.

Aladenola

Adeboye

. Assessing the potential for rainwater harvesting. Water Resour Manag 2010; 24: 2129–2137.

15.

Ishaku

Majid

Johar

. Rainwater harvesting: an alternative to safe water supply in Nigerian rural communities. Water Resour Manag 2011; 26: 295–305.

16.

Agudelo-Vera

Keesman

Mels

et al.

Evaluating the potential of improving residential water balance at building scale. Water Res 2013; 47: 7287–7299.

17.

Mourad

Berndtsson

. Potential fresh water saving using greywater in toilet flushing in Syria. J Environ Manag 2011; 92: 2447–2453.

18.

Santos

Taveira-Pinto

Cheng

et al.

Development of an experimental system for greywater reuse. Desalination 2012; 285: 301–305.

19.

Ahmad

Prashar

. Evaluating municipal water conservation policies using a dynamic simulation model. Water Resour Manag 2010; 24: 3371–3395.

20.

Fidar

Memon

Butler

. Environmental implications of water efficient microcomponents in residential buildings. Sci Total Environ 2010; 408: 5828–5835.

21.

Lee

Tansel

Balbin

. Influence of residential water use efficiency measures on household water demand: a four year longitudinal study. Resour Conserv Recy 2011; 56: 1–6.

22.

Millock

Nauges

. Household adoption of water-efficient equipment: the role of socio-economic factors, environmental attitudes and policy. Environ Resour Econ 2010; 46: 539–565.

23.

Beal

Stewart

Huang

et al.

SEQ residential end use study. J Austr Water Assoc 2011; 38: 80–84.

24.

Lee

Tansel

Balbin

. Goal based water conservation projections based on historical water use data and trends in Miami-Dade County. Sustain Cities Soc 2011; 1: 97–103.

25.

Liu

. Situation and measures beyond over-pressure outlet in building water supply system. Water Wastewater Eng 2002; 28: 48–51. (in Chinese).

26.

Wong

Mui

Zhou

. Energy efficiency evaluation for the water supply systems in tall buildings. Build Serv Eng Res Technol 2017; 38: 400–407.

27.

Feldman M. Aspects of energy efficiency in water supply systems. In: Proceedings of the 5th IWA water loss reduction specialist conference, South Africa, 2009, pp. 85–89.

28.

Wong

Mui

Lau

et al.

Pump efficiency of water supply systems in buildings of Hong Kong. Energy Procedia 2014; 61: 335–338.

29.

Wong

Zhou

Mui

et al.

Optimizing water supply pump replacement in buildings of Hong Kong. Build Serv Eng Res Technol 2015; 37: 489–498.

30.

Shrestha

Ahmad

Johnson

et al.

The carbon footprint of water management policy options. Energ Policy 2012; 42: 201–212.

31.

Ramos

Kenov

Vieira

. Environmentally friendly hybrid solutions to improve the energy and hydraulic efficiency in water supply systems. Energ Sustain Dev 2011; 15: 436–442.

32.

Nogueira Vilanova

Perrella Balestieri

. Energy and hydraulic efficiency in conventional water supply systems. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 2014; 30: 701–714.

33.

FEMP. Domestic water conservation technologies. US federal energy management programme: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, http://www1.eere.energy.gov/femp/pdfs/22799.pdf (2002, accessed 05 September 2017).

34.

Wilkenfeld and Associates Pty Ltd. A mandatory water efficiency labelling scheme for Australia. Environment Australia, http://www.waterrating.gov.au/resource/final-report-mandatory-water-efficiency-labelling-scheme-australia (2003, accessed 05 September 2017).

35.

Araujo

Ramos

Coelho

. Pressure control for leakage minimisation in water distribution systems management. Water Resour Manag 2006; 20: 133–149.

36.

Nicolini

Giacomello

Deb

. Calibration and optimal leakage management for a real water distribution network. J Water Res Pl ASCE 2011; 137: 134–142.

37.

Fidar

Memon

Butler

. Performance evaluation of conventional and water saving taps. Sci Total Environ 2016; 541: 815–824.

38.

Neve A. Water efficient studies. Annual Report 2005/2006. Portsmouth Water, http://www.portsmouthwater.co.uk/environment/WtrEfficStudiesJuly2006.pdf (2006, accessed 30 June 2010).

39.

Mayer P, DeOreo W and Lewis, D. Seattle home water conservation study: the impacts of high efficiency plumbing fixture retrofits in single-family homes. Seattle Public Utilities and the United States Environmental Protection Agency, http://www.energy.ca.gov/appliances/2013rulemaking/documents/responses/Water_Appliances_12-AAER-2C/California_IOU_Response_to_CEC_Invitation_to_Participate-Toilets_and_Urinals_REFERENCES/Aquacraft_2000_Seattle_Home_Water_Conservation_Study.pdf (2000, accessed 23 December 2017).

40.

Proença

Ghisi

Tavares

DDF

et al.

Potential for electricity savings by reducing potable water consumption in a city scale. Resour Conserv Recycl 2011; 55: 960–965.

41.

DCLG. The water efficiency calculator for new dwellings. Department of Communities and Local Governments, http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/uploads/br/water_efficiency_calculator.pdf (2009, accessed 05 September 2017).