Investigating the relationship between indoor environment and workplace productivity in naturally and mechanically ventilated office environments

Abstract

This paper uses a case study-based approach to empirically investigate the relationship between indoor environment and workplace productivity in two contrasting office environments: one naturally ventilated, the other mechanically ventilated. Environmental parameters were continuously monitored over 19 months. Transverse and longitudinal surveys recorded occupants’ perception of their working environment and self-reported productivity, while performance tasks (numerical and proofreading) measured cognitive capability as proxy for measured productivity. Indoor temperatures and CO₂ concentrations were found to be higher and more variable in the naturally ventilated office. However, the correlation between occupant perception of their indoor environment and perceived productivity was stronger in the mechanically ventilated office. Occupants of the naturally ventilated office were found to be more tolerant of their environment than their counterparts in the mechanically ventilated office. Task performance was affected by indoor environmental conditions such as indoor temperature and CO₂ concentration. Interestingly in the naturally ventilated office, the median scores were up to 12% higher for tests conducted at CO₂ concentrations <1400 ppm, compared to those conducted above 1400 ppm, whereas in the mechanically ventilated office, this threshold was only 1000 ppm.

Practical application

The study showed that higher concentrations of CO₂ were associated with lower task scores and longer task durations, reinforcing the need for good levels of ventilation in workspaces. It was found that occupants in NV workspaces were able to adapt to a broader range of environmental conditions. Therefore, controlling the indoor environment within narrow ranges (expending significant amounts of energy in the process) may not always be necessary to improve comfort and productivity. On the other hand, controlling indoor environment within a narrow range – as is common in MV workspaces – may be counterproductive, creating occupants who are less tolerant of small changes in their environmental conditions. The study also demonstrates occupant surveys can provide useful feedback on perceived comfort and productivity at relatively low cost. Insights from such surveys can be used to improve indoor environment in workspaces.

Keywords

Productivity office indoor environment health comfort

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BCO. Defining and measuring productivity in offices. London, UK: British Council of Offices, 2017.

ONS. International comparisons of UK productivity (ICP), first estimates: 2016. London, UK: Office for National Statistics, 2017.

ONS. Long term sickness absence UK: Office for National Statistics, www.gov.uk/government/statistics/long-term-sickness-absence (2014, accessed 17 November 2019).

CABE. The impact of office design on business performance. London, UK: British Council for Offices, 2005.

Alker

Malanca

Pottage

, et al. Health, wellbeing & productivity in offices: the next chapter for green building. United States: World Green Building Council, 2014.

Niemelä

Hannula

Rautio

, et al. The effect of air temperature on labour productivity in call centres – a case study. Energy Build 2002; 34: 759–764.

Seppanen

Fisk

Lei

Effect of temperature on task performance in office environment. Berkeley, CA: Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2006.

Park

Yoon

The effects of outdoor air supply rate on work performance during 8‐h work period.

Indoor Air 2011; 21: 284–290.

Browning

Biophilia, buildings, and your brain.

People Strategy 2016; 39: 8.

10.

Feige

Wallbaum

Janser

, et al. Impact of sustainable office buildings on occupant's comfort and productivity. J Corporate Real Estate 2013; 15: 7–34.

11.

ASHRAE. Standard 55-2010: thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. Atlanta, GA, USA: ASHRAE, 2010.

12.

Witterseh

Wyon

Clausen

The effects of moderate heat stress and open-plan office noise distraction on SBS symptoms and on the performance of office work.

Indoor Air 2004; 14: 30–40.

13.

Lan

Wargocki

Wyon

, et al

Effects of thermal discomfort in an office on perceived air quality, SBS symptoms, physiological responses, and human performance.

Indoor Air 2011; 21: 376–390.

14.

Vimalanathan

Babu

TR.

The effect of indoor office environment on the work performance, health and well-being of office workers.

J Environ Health Sci Eng 2014; 12: 113.

15.

Fang

Wyon

Clausen

, et al. Impact of indoor air temperature and humidity in an office on perceived air quality, SBS symptoms and performance. Indoor Air 2004; 14: 74–81.

16.

Liu

Yao

Wang

, et al. Occupants’ behavioural adaptation in workplaces with non-central heating and cooling systems. Appl Therm Eng 2012; 35: 40–54.

17.

Tanabe

S-I

Haneda

Nishihara

Workplace productivity and individual thermal satisfaction.

Build Environ 2015; 91: 42–50.

18.

Geng

Lin

, et al. The impact of thermal environment on occupant IEQ perception and productivity. Build Environ 2017; 121: 158–167.

19.

Allen

MacNaughton

Satish

, et al. Associations of cognitive function scores with carbon dioxide, ventilation, and volatile organic compound exposures in office workers: a controlled exposure study of green and conventional office environments. Environ Health Perspect 2015; 124: 805–812.

20.

Chang

Kajackaite

Battle for the thermostat: gender and the effect of temperature on cognitive performance.

PLoS One 2019; 14: e0216362.

21.

Tham

Willem

SYMPOSIUM PAPERS-DE-05-10 indoor environments and human productivity-temperature and ventilation effects on performance and neurobehavioral-related symptoms of tropically acclimatized call center.

ASHRAE Transac 2005; 111: 687–698.

22.

Wargocki

Wyon

Fanger

PO.

Pollution source control and ventilation improve health, comfort and productivity.

DKV Tagungsbericht 2000; 27: 47–54.

23.

Satish

Mendell

Shekhar

, et al. Is CO₂ an indoor pollutant? Direct effects of low-to-moderate CO2 concentrations on human decision-making performance. Environ Health Perspect 2012; 120: 1671–1677.

24.

Kajtar

Herczeg

Lang

(eds). Examination of influence of CO₂ concentration by scientific methods in the laboratory. Proc Health Build 2003; 3: 176–181.

25.

Fisk

Price

Faulkner

, et al. Worker performance and ventilation: analyses of time-series data for a group of call-center workers. In: A Compilation of Papers for the Indoor Air 2002 Conference In Memory of Joan M. Daisey 2002; 13.

26.

Mulville

Callaghan

Isaac

The impact of the ambient environment and building configuration on occupant productivity in open-plan commercial offices.

J Corporate Real Estate 2016; 18: 180–93.

27.

Lipczynska

Schiavon

Graham

LT.

Thermal comfort and self-reported productivity in an office with ceiling fans in the tropics.

Build Environ 2018; 135: 202–212.

28.

Al Horr

Arif

Kaushik

, et al. Occupant productivity and office indoor environment quality: a review of the literature. Build Environ 2016; 105: 369–389.

29.

Gupta

Cudmore

Bruce-Konuah

Desktop investigation to examine the relationship between indoor environmental conditions and productivity in work spaces. In: Proceedings of International Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design for Society (SEEDS) conference, 14–15 September 2016, Leeds.

30.

BUS. BUS methodology, www.busmethodology.org.uk (accessed 17 November 2019)