Energy-saving potential assessment of a classroom building envelope through sensitivity analysis and multi-objective optimization under different climate types
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2023
Energy-saving potential assessment of a classroom building envelope through sensitivity analysis and multi-objective optimization under different climate types
The present work aims to optimize the thermal behavior of a building envelope by combining sensitivity analysis (SA) and multi-objective optimization (MOO). An existing classroom located in Marrakech city was considered a case study building. The building model was analyzed under six Moroccan climate zones. The SA was applied on 16 design variables and performed using the Morris method implemented in the tool Simlab to rank each design variable based on its influence on the objective function (overall energy demand). The SA results showed that the solar absorptance of the internal roof, wall, and ground floor and the ground hollow core slab thickness impacted less the overall energy demand. Therefore, the only remaining variables showing the most relevant effect will be optimized afterward. The optimization phase was conducted by coupling the generic optimization tool GenOpt with TRNSYS. The optimum solution was selected based on the Pareto front approach. The obtained results assessed the effectiveness of the adopted methodological approach in significant minimization of the required thermal loads. Furthermore, the values of each optimum design variables set differ from one climate zone to another; leading to energy demand reduction varying from 30 to 42%, in comparison with the original design building.
LuSLiJLinB. Reliability analysis of an energy-based form optimization of office buildings under uncertainties in envelope and occupant parameters. Energy Build2020; 209: 109707.
2.
ShiGLiuDWeiQ. Energy consumption prediction of office buildings based on echo state networks. Neurocomputing2016; 216: 478–488.
3.
AMEE. Moroccan agency for energy efficiency. Morocco: AMEE; 2017http://www.amee.ma
4.
Méndez EchenaguciaTCapozzoliACasconeY, et al.The early design stage of a building envelope: Multi-objective search through heating, cooling and lighting energy performance analysis. Appl Energy2015; 154: 577–591.
5.
WildePDVoordenMVD. Providing computational support for the selection of energy saving building components. Energy Build2004; 36: 749–758.
6.
KonisK.GamasA.KensekK.Passive performance and building form: an optimization framework for early-stage design support. Sol Energy2016; 125: 161–179.
7.
FengJLuoXGaoM, et al.Minimization of energy consumption by building shape optimization using an improved manta-ray foraging optimization algorithm. Energy Reports2021; 7: 1068–1078.
8.
GunantaraN. A review of multi-objective optimization: methods and its applications. Cogent Eng2018; 5: 1502242–1502316.
9.
KarmellosMKiprakisAMavrotasG. A multi-objective approach for optimal prioritization of energy efficiency measures in buildings: model, software and case studies. Appl Energy2015; 139: 131–150.
10.
EvinsR. A review of computational optimisation methods applied to sustainable building design. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2013; 22: 230–245.
11.
MachairasVTsangrassoulisAAxarliK. Algorithms for optimization of building design: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2014; 31: 101–112.
12.
HamdyMNguyenATHensenJLM. A performance comparison of multi-objective optimization algorithms for solving nearly-zero-energy-building design problems. Energy Build2016; 121: 57–71.
13.
HashempourNTaherkhaniRMahdikhaniM. Energy performance optimization of existing buildings: a literature review. Sustain Cities Soc2020; 54: 101967.
14.
FatyanosaTNSihanantoANAlfarisyGAF, et al.Hybrid genetic algorithm and simulated annealing for function optimization. JITeCS2017; 1: 82.
15.
BichiouYKrartiM. Optimization of envelope and HVAC systems selection for residential buildings. Energy Build2011; 43: 3373–3382.
16.
SiBTianZJinX, et al.Performance indices and evaluation of algorithms in building energy efficient design optimization. Energy2016; 114: 100–112.
17.
VarmaPBhattacharjeeB. Evaluating performance of simulated annealing and genetic algorithm based approach in building envelope optimisation environmental design solutions Pvt Ltd., India Indian institute of technology – Delhi, India optimisation algorithm (OA). In: 14th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, Hyderabad, 2015.
18.
Costa-CarrapiçoIRaslanRGonzálezJN. A systematic review of genetic algorithm-based multi-objective optimisation for building retrofitting strategies towards energy efficiency. Energy Build2020; 210: 109690.
19.
NguyenATReiterSRigoP. A review on simulation-based optimization methods applied to building performance analysis. Appl Energy2014; 113: 1043–1058.
20.
BanoFSehgalV. Finding the gaps and methodology of passive features of building envelope optimization and its requirement for office buildings in India. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress2019; 9: 66–93.
21.
AttiaSHamdyMO’BrienW, et al.Assessing gaps and needs for integrating building performance optimization tools in net zero energy buildings design. Energy Build2013; 60: 110–124.
22.
AscioneFDe MasiRFde RossiF, et al.Optimization of building envelope design for nZEBs in Mediterranean climate: performance analysis of residential case study. Appl Energy2016; 183: 938–957.
23.
AmeurMKharbouchYMimetA. Optimization of passive design features for a naturally ventilated residential building according to the bioclimatic architecture concept and considering the northern Morocco climate. Build Simul2020; 13: 677–689.
24.
ZhangTWangDLiuH, et al.Numerical investigation on building envelope optimization for low-energy buildings in low latitudes of China. Build Simul2020; 13: 257–269.
25.
KoširMIgličNKuničR. Optimisation of heating, cooling and lighting energy performance of modular buildings in respect to location’s climatic specifics. Renew Energy2018; 129: 527–539.
26.
ShaoTJinHZhengWX. Optimization research of rural Hhouse’s envelope parameters in severe cold regions of China. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci2020; 581: 012037.
27.
AscioneFBiancoNIovaneT, et al.A real industrial building: modeling, calibration and Pareto optimization of energy retrofit. Journal of Building Engineering2020; 29: 101186.
28.
HarkoussFFardounFBiwolePH. Multi-objective optimization methodology for net zero energy buildings. Journal of Building Engineering2018; 16: 57–71.
29.
AsadiEda SilvaMGAntunesCH, et al.A multi-objective optimization model for building retrofit strategies using TRNSYS simulations, GenOpt and MATLAB. Build Environ2012; 56: 370–378.
30.
AscioneFBiancoNMaria MauroG, et al.Building envelope design: multi-objective optimization to minimize energy consumption, global cost and thermal discomfort. Application to different Italian climatic zones. Energy2019; 174: 359–374.
31.
PennaPPradaACappellettiF, et al.Multi-objectives optimization of energy efficiency measures in existing buildings. Energy Build2015; 95: 57–69.
32.
ShaoYGeyerPLangW. Integrating requirement analysis and multi-objective optimization for office building energy retrofit strategies. Energy Build2014; 82: 356–368.
33.
BreFSilvaASGhisiE, et al.Residential building design optimisation using sensitivity analysis and genetic algorithm. Energy Build2016; 133: 853–866.
34.
TianW. A review of sensitivity analysis methods in building energy analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2013; 20: 411–419.
35.
HeiselbergPBrohusHHesselholtA, et al.Application of sensitivity analysis in design of sustainable buildings. Renew Energy2009; 34: 2030–2036.
36.
African Development Bank M. M. de l’éducation nationale. D. des bâtiments et de l’équipement. Guide pour la réalisation des établissements du premier cycle de l ’ enseignement fondamental. Section Architecture pour l’Éducation, 2000, https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000129494
37.
BenaddiFZBoukhattemLBenhamouB, et al.Study on the performance of thermal energy of a classroom built with natural materials. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Energy2022; 1: 1–16. DOI: 10.1680/jener.21.00081.
TRNSYS18. A transient system simulation program. In Volume 5: Multizone Building modeling with Type56 and TRNBuild. Madison, USA: Solar Energy Laboratory, University of Wisconsin, (2017).
40.
IncroperaFPDewittDP. Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer. Fluid Mechanics and its Applications1985; 1: 112.
ASHRAE. American society of heating, refrigerating and air-conditioning engineers. Fundamentals2009; 1: 30329
43.
AMEE, Manuel technique de l’éclairage AMEE. In National Agency for Energy Efficiency, Morocco: AMEE. www.amee.ma. 2015.
44.
LafqirFESobhyIBenhamouB, et al.Thermal performance of passive techniques integrated to a house and the concept of passive house in the six climates of Morocco. Sci Technol Built Environ2020; 26: 1490–1508.
45.
FosterMOreszczynT. Occupant control of passive systems: the use of Venetian blinds. Build Environ2001; 36: 149–155.
KingDMPereraBJC. Morris method of sensitivity analysis applied to assess the importance of input variables on urban water supply yield - A case study. J Hydrol X2013; 477: 17–32.
49.
RenJZhangWYangJ. Morris sensitivity analysis for hydrothermal coupling parameters of embankment dam: a case study. Math Probl Eng2019.
50.
SaltelliARattoMAndresT, et al.Global sensitivity analysis: the primer. Angewandte Chemie International Edition1967; 6(11): 951–952.
51.
SaltelliARattoMAndresT, et al.Global sensitivity analysis: the Primer, 2017; 53
NguyenATReiterS. A performance comparison of sensitivity analysis methods for building energy models. Build Simul2015; 8: 651–664.
54.
MastouriHBenhamouBHamdiH, et al.Thermal performance assessment of passive techniques integrated into a residential building in semi-arid climate. Energy Build2017; 143: 1–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.03.022.
55.
WetterM, GenOpt. Generic optimization program. User Manual.Version 3.1.1. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (2016).
56.
BreFRomanNFachinottiVD. An efficient metamodel-based method to carry out multi-objective building performance optimizations. Energy Build2020; 206: 109576.
57.
LiHWangSCheungH. Sensitivity analysis of design parameters and optimal design for zero/low energy buildings in subtropical regions. Appl Energy2018; 228: 1280–1291.
