Given that recent studies highlight the potentially negative impact of `new' or `high performance' work practices on workers, the main objective of the present study is to investigate the effects of such work practices on workers' well-being for a northern Italy local production system. In addition, it is also important not to overlook the role of other firms' innovation activities and industrial relations. Thus, the empirical strategy aims to disentangle the role of innovation intensity in four different areas (technology, organization, training and ICT) and that of cooperative industrial relations at firm level on working conditions. The evidence is mixed. On the one hand, innovations have an overall positive effect on working conditions. However, this effect is weak and for specific organizational aspects, is negative. On the other hand, cooperative industrial relations are always positively and robustly linked to workers' well-being.
Amin, A. (1999) `The Emilian Model: Institutional Challenges', European Planning Studies7(4): 389-406.
2.
Antonioli, D. and P. Pini (2004) `Dinamiche innovative e performance d'impresa: analisi cluster per un sistema industriale locale', Istituzioni e Sviluppo Economico2(1): 65-104.
3.
Antonioli, D., M. Mazzanti, P. Pini and E. Tortia (2004) `Adoption of Techno-Organizational Innovations, and Industrial Relations in Manufacturing Firms: An Analysis for a Local Industrial System', Economia PoliticaXXI(1): 11-52.
4.
Antonioli, D., M. Mazzanti and P. Pini (2007a) `Productivity, Innovation Strategies and Industrial Relations in SME: Empirical Evidence for a Local Manufacturing System in Northern Italy', Working Paper No. 21, DEIT, University of Ferrara ; at: www.deit.economia.unife.it
5.
Antonioli, D., L. Delsoldato, M. Mazzanti and P. Pini (2007b) Dinamiche innovative, relazioni industriali, performance nelle imprese manifatturiere. II Indagine sul sistema locale di Reggio Emilia . Milan: FrancoAngeli.
6.
Askenazy, P. (2004) `Shorter Work Times, Hours Flexibility, and Labour Intensification', Eastern Economic Journal30(4): 603-14.
7.
Askenazy, P. and E. Caroli (2006) `Innovative Work Practices, Information Technologies and Working Conditions: Evidence for France', Discussion Paper No. 2321, IZA, Bonn.
8.
Baglioni, G. (1998) `Il sistema delle relazioni industriali in Italia: caratteristiche ed evoluzione storica', in G.P. Cella and T. Treu (eds) Le nuove relazioni industriali. L'esperienza italiana nella prospettiva europea . Bologna: Il Mulino.
9.
Bélanger, J., A. Giles and G. Murray (2002) `Towards a New Production Model: Potentialities, Tensions and Contradictions', in G. Murray , J. Bélanger, A. Giles and A. Lapointe (eds) Work and Employment Relations in the High-Performance Workplace. London: Continuum.
10.
Betts, J., C. Odgers and M. Wilson (2001) `The Effects of Unions on Research and Development: An Empirical Analysis Using Multi-Year Data', Canadian Journal of Economics34(3): 785-806.
11.
Black, S. and L. Lynch (2001) `How to Compete: The Impact of Workplace Practices and Information Technology on Productivity', Review of Economics and Statistics83(3): 434-45.
12.
Black, S., L. Lynch and A. Krivelyova (2004) `How Workers Fare When Employers Innovate', Industrial Relations43(1): 44-66.
13.
Brenner, M., D. Fairris and J. Ruser (2004) `Flexible Work Practices and Occupational Safety and Health: Exploring the Relationship between Cumulative Trauma Disorders and Workplace Transformation', Industrial Relations43(1): 242-66.
14.
Bresnahan, T.F., E. Brynjolfsson and L.M. Hitt (2002) `Information Technology, Workplace Organization, and the Demand for Skilled Labor: Firm-Level Evidence', Quarterly Journal of Economics117(1): 339-76.
15.
Brusco, S. (1982) `The Emilian Model: Productive Decentralization and Social Integration', Cambridge Journal of Economics6(2): 167-84.
16.
Brynjolfsson, E. and L. Hitt (2000) `Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance', Journal of Economic Perspectives14(4): 23-48.
17.
Butler, P., A. Felstead, D. Ashton, A. Fuller, T. Lee, L. Unwin and S. Walters (2004) `High Performance Management: A Literature Review', Learning as Work Research Paper No. 1 (June).
18.
Cappelli, P. and D. Neumark (2001) `Do "High Performance" Work Practices Improve Establishment-Level Outcomes?', Industrial and Labor Relations Review54(4): 737-75.
19.
Caroli, E. and J. van Reenen (2001) `Skill Biased Organizational Change? Evidence from a Panel of French and British Establishments', Quarterly Journal of Economics16(4): 1449-92.
20.
Cochran, W. (1977) Sampling Techniques. New York : John Wiley.
21.
Cristini, A. and R. Leoni (2005) `Nuove forme di organizzazione del lavoro e pratiche di coinvolgimento', Quaderni di rassegna sindacaleVI(2): 143-94.
22.
EC (2002) New Forms of Work Organization: The Obstacles to Wider Diffusion, European Commission, Final Report. Brussels: EC.
23.
Fairris, D. (2004) `Towards a Theory of Work Intensity', Eastern Economic Journal30(4): 587-601.
24.
Forth, J. and N. Milward (2004) `High-Involvement Management and Pay in Britain' , Industrial Relations43(1): 98-119.
25.
Gallie, D. (2005) `Work Pressure in Europe 1996-2001: Trends and Determinants', British Journal of Industrial Relations43(3): 351-75.
26.
Gittleman, M., M. Horrigan and M. Joyce (1998) ` "Flexible" Workplace Practices: Evidence from a National Representative Survey', Industrial and Labor Relations Review52(1): 99-115.
27.
Green, F. (2004) `Why Has Work Effort Become More Intense?', Industrial Relations43(4): 709-41.
28.
Green, F. and S. McIntosh (2001) `The Intensification of Work in Europe', Labour Economics8(2): 291-308.
29.
Handel, M. and M. Gittleman (2004) `Is There a Wage Payoff to Innovative Work Practices?' , Industrial Relations43(1): 67-97.
30.
Handel, M. and D. Levine (2004) `Editors' Introduction: The Effects of New Work Practices on Workers', Industrial Relations43(1): 1-43.
31.
Huselid, M. (1995) `The Impact of Human Resources Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity and Corporate Financial Performance', Academy of Management Journal38(3): 635-72.
32.
Huselid, M.A. and B.E. Becker (1996) `Methodological Issues in Cross-Sectional and Panel Estimates of the Human Resource-Firm Performance Link', Industrial Relations35(3): 400-22.
33.
Ichniowski, C. (1990) `Human Resource Management Systems and the Performance of US Manufacturing Businesses', Working Paper No. 3449, NBER, Cambridge.
34.
Ichniowski, C., K. Shaw and G. Prennushi (1997) `The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity: A Case Study of Steel Finishing Line', American Economic Review87(3): 291-313.
35.
Janod, V. and A. Saint-Martin (2004) `Measuring the Impact of Work Reorganization on Firm Performance: Evidence from French Manufacturing, 1995-1999', Labour Economics11(6): 785-98.
36.
Leoni, R., ed. (2008) Economia dell'innovazione. Disegni organizzativi, pratiche di gestione delle risorse umane e performance d'impresa. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
37.
Lynch, L. (2007) `The Adoption and Diffusion of Organizational Innovation: Evidence for the US Economy', Discussion Paper No. 2819, IZA, Bonn.
38.
Menezes-Filho, N. and J. van Reenen (2003) `Unions and Innovation: A Survey of the Theory and Empirical Evidence', in J.T. Addison and C. Schnabel (eds) International Handbook of Trade Unions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
39.
Menezes-Filho, N., D. Ulph and J. van Reenen (1998) `R&D and Unionism: Comparative Evidence from British Companies and Establishments', Industrial and Labour Relations Review52(1): 45-63.
40.
Metcalf, D. (2003) `Unions and Productivity, Financial Performance and Investment: International Evidence', in J.T. Addison and C. Schnabel (eds) International Handbook of Trade Unions. Cheltenham : Edward Elgar.
41.
Michie, J. and M. Sheehan (2003) `Labour Market Deregulation, "Flexibility" and Innovation', Cambridge Journal of Economics27(1): 123-43.
42.
Osterman, P. (1994) `How Common is Workplace Transformation and How Can We Explain Who Adopts It?', Industrial and Labor Relations Review47(2): 175-88.
43.
Osterman, P. (2000) `Work Organization in a Era of Restructuring: Trends in Diffusion and Impacts on Employee Welfare', Industrial and Labor Relations Review52(2): 179-96.
44.
Renaud, S. (2002) `Rethinking the Union Membership/Job Satisfaction Relationship: Some Empirical Evidence in Canada', International Journal of Manpower23(2): 137-50.
45.
Seravalli, G. (2001) `Sviluppo economico e mercato del lavoro a Reggio Emilia', Working Paper, Reggio Emilia, CGIL, mimeo.
46.
Wood, S. (1999) `Getting the Measure of the Transformed High Performance Organization', British Journal of Industrial Relations37(3): 391-417.
47.
Zwick, T. (2004) `Employee Participation and Productivity', Labour Economics11(6): 715-40.
