Current systems for listing empirically supported therapies (ESTs) provide recognition to treatment packages, many of them proprietary and trademarked, without regard to the principles of change believed to account for their effectiveness. Our position is that any authoritative body representing the science and profession of psychology should work solely toward the identification of empirically supported principles of change (ESPs). As challenging as it is to take this approach, a system that lists ESPs will keep a focus on issues central to the science and practice of psychology while also insulating the profession from undue entrepreneurial influences.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Angell, M. (2000). Is academic medicine for sale? New England Journal of Medicine, 342, 1516-1518.
2.
Beutler, L. E. (1991). Have all won and must all have prizes? Revisiting Luborsky et al.'s verdict. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 226-232.
3.
Beutler, L. E. (1998). Identifying empirically supported treatments: What if we didn't? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 113-120.
4.
Beutler, L. E., Kim, E. J., Davison, E. H., Karno, M., & Fisher, D. (1996). Research contributions to improving managed health care outcomes. Psychotherapy, 33, 197-206.
5.
Bodenheimer, T. (2000). Uneasy alliance: Clinical investigators and the pharmaceutical industry. New England Journal of Medicine, 342, 1539-1544.
6.
Borkovec, T. D. (1997). On the need for a basic science approach to psychotherapy research. Psychological Science, 8, 145-147.
7.
Borkovec, T. D., & Castonguay, L. G. (1998). What is the scientific meaning of empirically supported therapy? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 136-142.
8.
Chambless, D. L., Baker, M. J., Baucom, D. H., Beutler, L. E., Calhoun, K. S., Crits-Christoph, P., et al. (1998). Update on empirically validated therapies. II. The Clinical Psychologist, 51, 3-15.
9.
Chambless, D. L., & Hollon, S. D. (1998). Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 7-18.
10.
Chambless, D. L., & Ollendick, T. H. (2001). Empirically supported psychological interventions: Controversies and evidence. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 685-716.
11.
Chambless, D. L., Sanderson, W. C., Shoham, V., Bennett-Johnson, S., Pope, K. S., Crits-Christoph, P., et al. (1996). An update on empirically validated therapies. The Clinical Psychologist, 49, 5-18.
12.
Davidson, P. R., & Parker, K. C. H. (2001). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR): A meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 305-316.
13.
Davison, G. C. (1998). Being bolder with the Boulder model: The challenge of education and training in empirically supported treatments. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 163-167.
14.
Davison, G. C. (2000). Stepped care: Doing more with less? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 580-585.
15.
Davison, G. C., & Lazarus, A. A. (1995). The dialectics of science and practice. In S. C. Hayes, V. M. Follette, R. M. Dawes, & K. E. Grady (Eds.), Scientific standards of psychological practice: Issues and recommendations (pp. 95-120). Reno, NV: Context Press.
16.
DeBell, C., & Jones, D. R. (1997). As good as it seems? A review of EMDR experimental research. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28, 153-163.
17.
Devilly, G. J., & Spence, S. H. (1999). The relative efficacy and treatment distress of EMDR and a cognitive-behavior trauma treatment protocol in the amelioration of posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 13, 131-157.
18.
Drozd, J. F., & Goldfried, M. R. (1996). A critical evaluation of the state-of-the-art in psychotherapy outcome research. Psychotherapy, 33, 171-180.
19.
Eisen, S. V., & Dickey, B. (1996). Mental health outcome assessment: The new agenda. Psychotherapy, 33, 181-189.
20.
Eysenck, H. J. (1952). The effects of psychotherapy: An evaluation. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 16, 319-324.
21.
Eysenck, H. J. (Ed.) (1960). Behavior therapy and the neuroses. New York: Pergamon.
22.
Frank, J. D. (1961). Persuasion and healing. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
23.
Garfield, S. L. (1998). Some comments on empirically supported treatments. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 121-125.
24.
Goldfried, M. R., & Wolfe, B. E. (1998). Toward a more clinically valid approach to therapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 143-150.
25.
Goldstein, A. J., deBeurs, E., Chambless, D. L., & Wilson, K. A. (2000). EMDR for panic disorder with agoraphobia: Comparison with waiting list and credible attention-placebo control conditions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 947-956.
26.
Herbert, J. D. (2000). Defining empirically supported treatments: Pitfalls and possible solutions. the Behavior Therapist, 23, 113-122.
27.
Herbert, J. D., Lilienfeld, S. O., Lohr, J. M., Montgomery, R. W., O'Donohue, W. T., Rosen, G. M., et al. (2000). Science and pseudoscience in the development of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing: Implications for clinical psychology. Clinical Psychology Review, 20, 945-971.
28.
Kendall, P. C. (1998). Empirically supported psychological therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 3-6.
29.
Lohr, J. M. (1996). Analysis by analogy for the mental health clinician [Review of F. Shapiro, 1995]. Contemporary Psychology, 41, 879-880.
30.
Lohr, J. M., Tolin, D. F., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (1998). Efficacy of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing: Implications for behavior therapy. Behavior Therapy, 29, 123-156.
31.
Luborsky, Lester, Singer, B., & Luborsky, Lise (1975). Comparative studies of psychotherapies. Archives of General Psychiatry, 32, 995-1008.
32.
McNally, R. J. (1999a). On eye movements and animal magnetism: A reply to Greenwald's defense of EMDR. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 13, 617-620.
33.
McNally, R. J. (1999b). EMDR and Mesmerism: A comparative historical analysis. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 13, 225-236.
34.
Metter, J., & Michelson, L. K. (1993). Theoretical, clinical, research, and ethical constraints of the eye movement desensitization reprocessing technique. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 6, 413-415.
35.
Muris, P., & Merckelbach, H. (1999). Traumatic memories, eye movements, phobia, and panic: A critical note on the proliferation of EMDR. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 13, 209-223.
36.
Muris, P., Merckelbach, H., Holdrinet, I., & Sigsenaar, M. (1998). Treating phobic children: Effects of EMDR versus exposure. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 193-198.
37.
O'Donohue, W. T., & Thorpe, S. (1996). EMDR as marginal science [Review of F. Shapiro, 1995]. The Scientist Practitioner, 5, 17-19.
38.
Persons, J. B., & Silberschatz, G. (1998). Are results of randomized controlled trials useful to psychotherapists? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 126-135.
39.
Pitman, R. K., Orr, S. P., Altman, B., Longpre, R.E., Poire, R. E., & Macklin, M. L. (1996). Emotional processing during eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy of Vietnam veterans with chronic posttraumatic stress disorder. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 37, 419-429.
40.
Rosen, G. M. (1999). Treatment fidelity and research on eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR). Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 13, 173-184.
41.
Rosen, G. M., & Davison, G. C. (2001). “Echo attributions” and other risks when publishing on novel therapies without peer review. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57, 1245-1250.
42.
Rothbaum, B. O. (1997). A controlled study of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disordered sexual assault victims. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 61, 317-334.
43.
Sanderson, A., & Carpenter, R. (1992). Eye movement desensitization versus image confrontation: A single-session crossover study of 58 phobic subjects. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 23, 269-275.
44.
Shapiro, D. A. (1995). Finding out how psychotherapies help people change. Psychotherapy Research, 5, 1-21.
45.
Shapiro, F. (1995). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing: Basic principles, protocols, and procedures. New York: Guilford.
46.
Silverman, W. H. (1996). Cookbooks, manuals, and paint-by-numbers: Psychotherapy in the '90s. Psychotherapy, 33, 207-215.
47.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Free Press.
48.
Task Force on Promotion and Dissemination of Psychological Procedures (1995). Training in and dissemination of empirically validated treatments: Report and recommendations. The Clinical Psychologist, 48, 3-23.
49.
Wilson, G. T., & Davison, G. C. (1971). Processes of fear reduction in systematic desensitization: Animal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 1-14.
50.
Wilson, K. G. (1997). Science and treatment development: Lessons from the history of behavior therapy. Behavior Therapy, 28, 547-558.
51.
Wilson, S. A., Becker, L. A., & Tinker, R. H. (1995). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) treatment for psychologically traumatized individuals. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 928-937.
52.
Wolpe, J. (1958). Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
