Evaluating the Establishment and Maintenance of Visual-Visual and Gustatory-Visual Equivalence Relations in Adults With Developmental Disabilities

Abstract

Four adults with developmental disabilities were taught to make conditional discriminations between either pictures and their corresponding printed English and Spanish words, or tastes and their corresponding printed English and Spanish words. Participants required more training trials to master the visual-visual conditional discriminations than the gustatory-visual conditional discriminations, and 3 of the 4 participants performed with higher accuracy on visual equivalence class test trials than gustatory-visual equivalence class test trials. A follow-up equivalence test conducted 30 to 40 days later showed substantially greater stability over time for the gustatory-visual classes than for the visual classes, for all participants. That participants acquired gustatory-visual conditional discriminations, as well as equivalence classes based on those conditional discriminations, may have relevance for incorporating gustatory stimuli into mand training sessions, as well as for teaching individuals with sensory impairments in other modalities.

Keywords

stimulus equivalence cross modal discrete trial matching to sample developmental disabilities

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bondy, A. S. , & Frost, L. A. (1993). Mands across the water: A report on the application of the Picture-Exchange Communication System in Peru. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 123-128.

Bush, K. (1993). Stimulus equivalence and cross-modal transfer. The Psychological Record, 43, 567-584.

Green, G. (1990). Differences in the development of visual and auditory-visual equivalence relations. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 95, 260-270.

Green, G. , & Saunders, R. R. (1998). Stimulus equivalence. In K. A. Lattal & M. Perone (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in human operant behavior. New York: Plenum.

Hayes, L. J. , Tilley, K. J. , & Hayes, S. C. (1988). Extending equivalence class membership to gustatory stimuli. The Psychological Record, 38, 473-482.

Lane, S. D. , & Critchfield, T. S. (1998). Classification of vowels and consonants by individuals with moderate mental retardation: Development of arbitrary relations via match-to-sample training with compound stimuli. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 21-41.

Rehfeldt, R. A. , & Hayes, L. J. (2000). The long-term retention of generalized equivalence classes. The Psychological Record, 50, 405-428.

Sidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 5-13.

Sidman, M. , & Cresson, O., Jr. (1973). Reading and cross modal transfer of stimulus equivalences in severe mental retardation. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 515-523.

10.

Sidman, M. , Kirk, B. , & Willson-Morris, M. (1985). Six-member stimulus classes generated by conditional-discrimination procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 21-42.

11.

Spradlin, J. E. , Saunders, K. J. , & Saunders, R. R. (1992). The stability of equivalence classes. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp. 29-42). Reno, NV: Context Press.

12.

Stromer, R. , Mackay, H. , & Stoddard, L. T. (1992). Classroom applications of stimulus equivalence technology. Journal of Behavioral Education, 2, 225-256.