The study examined the effects of conducting observations as part of a broader assessment of families participating in behavior family intervention (BFI). It was designed to investigate whether the observations improve intervention outcomes. Families were randomly assigned to different levels of BFI or a waitlist control condition and subsequently randomly assigned to either observation or no-observation conditions. This study demonstrated significant intervention and observation effects. Mothers in more intensive BFI reported more improvement in their child's behavior and their own parenting. Observed mothers reported lower intensity of child behavior problems and more effective parenting styles. There was also a trend for less anger among mothers who were observed and evidence of an observation-intervention interaction for parental anger, with observed mothers in more intensive intervention reporting less anger compared to those not observed. Implications for clinical and research intervention contexts are discussed.
Arnold, D.S., O'Leary, S.G., Wolff, L.S., & Acker, M.M. (1993). The Parenting Scale: A measure of dysfunctional parenting in discipline situations. Psychological Assessment , 5, 137-144.
2.
Aspland, H., & Gardner, F. (2003). Observational measures of parent-child interaction: An introductory review. Child and Adolescent Mental Health , 8, 136-143.
3.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2002). 2001 census data. Retrieved June 17, 2005, from http://www.abs.gov.au
4.
Clifford, P.R., & Maisto, S.A. (2000). Subject reactivity effects and alcohol treatment outcome research. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 61, 787-793.
5.
Eddy, J.M., Dishion, T., & Stoolmiller, M. (1998). The analysis of intervention change in children and families: Methodological and conceptual issues embedded in intervention studies. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology , 26, 53-71.
6.
Eyberg, S.M., & Pincus, D. (1999). Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory and Sutter-Eyberg Student Behavior Inventory—Revised: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
7.
Forehand, R. (1990). Families with a conduct problem child. In G. H. Brody & I. E. Sigel (Eds.), Methods of family research: Biographies of research projects. Vol. II: Clinical Populations (pp. 1-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Gardner, F. (2000). Methodological issues in the direct observation of parent-child interaction: Do observational findings reflect the natural behavior of participants? Clinical Child and FamilyPsychology Review, 3, 185-198.
Green, K.D., Forehand, R., & McMahon, R.J. (1979). Parental manipulation of compliance and non-compliance in normal and deviant children. Behavior Modification, 3, 245-266.
11.
Hansen, D.J., & Sedlar, G. (1998). Manual for the PAI: The Parental Anger Inventory . Lincoln: University of Nebraska, Clinical Psychology Training Program.
12.
Harris, F.C., & Lahey, B.B. (1982). Subject reactivity in direct observational assessment: A review and critical analysis. Clinical Psychology Review , 2, 523-538.
13.
Hartmann, D.P., & Wood, D.D. (1990). Observational methods. In M. Hersen & A. E. Kazdin (Eds.), International handbook of behavior modification and therapy (2nd ed., pp. 107-138). New York: Plenum.
14.
Johnson, S., & Lobitz, G. (1974). Parental manipulation of child behaviour in home observations. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 23-31.
15.
Joyce, A.S., Ogrodniczuk, J.S., Piper, W.E., & McCallum, M. (2003). The alliance as mediator of expectancy effects in short-term individual therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 672-679.
16.
Kerig, P.K. (2000). Introduction and overview: Conceptual issues in family observational research. In P. K. Kerig & K. M. Lindahl (Eds.), Family observational coding systems: Resources for systemic research (pp. 1-22). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Lobitz, G., & Johnson, S. (1975). Parental manipulation of the behavior of normal and deviant children. Child Development, 46, 719-726.
18.
Locke, L.M., & Prinz, R.J. (2002). Measurement of parental discipline and nurturance . Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 895-929.
Morawska, A., & Sanders, M.R. (2006). Self-administered behavioural family intervention for parents of toddlers: Part I—Efficacy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 10-19.
21.
Patterson, G.R. (1982). Coercive family process. Eugene, OR: Castalia.
22.
Patterson, G.R., Reid, J.B., & Dishion, T.J. (1992). Antisocial boys. Eugene, OR : Castalia.
23.
Robinson, E.A., & Eyberg, S.M. (1981). The dyadic parent-child interaction coding system: Standardization and validation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 245-250.
24.
Rosenthal, R. (1966). Experimenter effects in behavioral research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
25.
Sanders, M.R. (1999). Triple P-Positive Parenting Program: Towards an empirically validated multilevel parenting and family support strategy for the prevention of behavior and emotional problems in children. Clinical Child and FamilyPsychology Review, 2, 71-90.
Spencer, F.W., Corcoran, C.A., Allen, G.J., Chinsky, J.M., & Veit, S.W. (1974). Reliability and reactivity of the videotape technique on a ward for retarded children. Journal of Community Psychology , 2, 71-74.
28.
Stoolmiller, M., Eddy, J.M., & Reid, J.B. (2000). Detecting and describing preventive intervention effects in a universal school-based randomized trial targeting delinquent and violent behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 68, 296-306.
29.
Tinsley, H.E.A., Workman, K.R., & Kass, R. (1980). Factor analysis of the domain of client expectancies about counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 27, 561-570.
30.
Tryon, W.W. (1998). Behavioral observation. In A. S. Bellack & M. Hersen (Eds.), Behavioral assessment: A practical handbook (pp. 79-103). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
31.
Turner, K.M.T., Markie-Dadds, C., & Sanders, M.R. (1996). Triple P tip sheet series for toddlers. Brisbane, Australia: Families International.
32.
Webster-Stratton, C. (1998). Preventing conduct problems in Head Start children: Strengthening parenting competencies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 715-730.
