Two studies are reported that examine the value of various components of a skills training program for ineffective public-speakers. The first study demonstrated the value of prolonged practice (flooding) in the reduction of the anxiety associated with speaking, while the second study showed that there were few differences between instructions plus modeling, on the one hand, and videotape feedback plus discussion, on the other. Only in terms of appropriate speaking behaviors was performance feedback superior to instructions and modeling. Both studies indicated that the combination of all elements was the most effective procedure, with the replacement, in the present series, of desensitization by flooding producing the most powerful and time-efficient program yet evaluated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ammons, R. B.Effect of knowledge performance: A survey and tentative theoretical framework . Journal of General Psychology, 1956, 54, 279-299.
2.
Angell, G. W.The effect of immediate knowledge of quiz results on final examination scores in freshman chemistry . Journal of Educational Research, 1949, 42, 391-394.
3.
Arnkoff, D. B. , & Stewart, J.The effectiveness of modeling and videotape feedback on personal problem solving. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1973, 13, 127-133.
4.
Atkinson, R. C.Teaching children to read using a computer . American Psychologist, 1974, 29, 169-178.
5.
Borkovec, T. D. , & O'Brien, G. T.Methodological and target behavior issues in analogue therapy outcome research. In M. Hersen, R. M. Eisler, & P.M. Miller (Eds.), Progress in behavior modification: Vol. 3. New York: Academic Press, 1976.
6.
Cooper, C. M., & Marshall, W. L. Self-instructions and behavioural competencies in the modification of public speaking difficulties. Unpublished manuscript, Queen's University, 1980.
7.
Elwell, J. L. , & Grindley, G. C.The effect of knowledge of results on learning and performance. British Journal of Psychology, 1938, 29, 54-54.
8.
Gauthier, J. , & Marshall, W. L.The determination of optimal exposure to phobic stimuli in flooding therapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1977, 15, 403-410.
9.
Hilgard, E. R. , Atkinson, R. C., & Atkinson, R. L.Introduction to psychology. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1975.
10.
Hobbs, N.Psychological research on flexible gunnery training . A.A.F. Aviationpsychology program research report, 1947, No. 11.
11.
Kazdin, A. E. , & Wilcoxon, L. A.Systematic desensitization and nonspecifictreatmenteffects: A methodological evaluation. Psychological Bulletin, 1976, 83, 729-758.
12.
Macpherson, S. J. , Dees, V., & Grindley, G. C.The effect of knowledge of results on learning and performance: II. Some characteristics of very simple skills. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1, 1948, 68-78.
13.
Marshall, W. L. , Gauthier, J., & Gordon, A.The current status of flooding therapy. In M. Hersen, R. M. Eisler, & P. M. Miller (Eds.), Progress in behavior modification: Vol 7. New York: Academic Press, 1979.
14.
Marshall, W. L. , Presse, L., & Andrews, W. R.A self administered program for public speaking anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1976, 14, 33-39.
15.
Marshall, W. L. , Stoian, M., & Andrews, W. R.Skills training and self administered desensitization in the reduction of public speaking anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1977, 15, 115-117.
16.
McFall, R. M. , & Lillesand, D. B.Behavior rehearsal with modeling and coaching in assertion training. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1971, 77, 313-323.
17.
McFall, R. M. , & Marston, A. R.An experimental investigation of behavior rehearsal in assertive training. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1970, 76, 295-303.
18.
McFall, R. M. , & Twentyman, C. T.Four experiments on the relative contributions of rehearsal, modeling, and coaching to assertion training. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1973, 81, 199-218.
19.
Meichenbaum, D.Selfinstructional methods. In F. H. Kanfer & A. P. Goldstein (Eds.), Helping people change: A textbook of methods. New York: Pergamon, 1975.
20.
Melnick, J. A.A comparison of replication techniques in the modification of minimal dating behavior . Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1973, 81, 51-59.
21.
Meyers, J. L.Fundamentals of experimental design. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1979.
22.
Munn, N. L.Psychology: The fundamentals of human adjustment. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1961.
23.
Paul, G. L.Insight vs desensitization in psychotherapy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1966.
24.
Rimm, D. C. , & Masters, J. C.Behavior therapy: Techniques and empiricalfindings. 2nd Edition. New York: Academic Press, 1979.
25.
Smode, A. F.Learning and performance in a tracking task under two levels of achievement information feedback . Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1958, 56, 297-304.
26.
Winer, B. J.Statisticalprinciples in experimental designs. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.
27.
Yates, A. J.Theory and practice in behavior therapy. New York: JohnWiley, 1975.
