Technologies Used in the Study of Advanced Mathematics by Students who Are Visually Impaired in Classrooms: Teachers’ Perspectives

Abstract

Introduction

This research examined the perspectives of teachers of students who are visually impaired regarding the use and effectiveness of high-tech assistive technology purported to assist visually impaired students in advanced mathematics.

Methods

The data for this study were collected via a mixed-methods online survey distributed through professional networks to reach teachers with experience supporting students who are braille readers in advanced mathematics. A device matrix was used to ask participants about three interrelated issues. First, which of the 35 assistive technologies presented did they use to aid students? Second, how was the technology implemented? And third, how did they rate the effectiveness of each device used? Open-response items provided space for additional tools and other feedback.

Results

A total of 82 surveys were completed through the device matrix question. Results conclusively indicated that 20 of the 35 technologies were used; of these, 13 were used regardless of subject. More than half of the participants indicated that the same four technologies were implemented for student information access during class, guided practice, and independent practice. Participants recommended seven technologies not included in the device matrix through the open-response questions.

Discussion

This survey revealed that teachers of visually impaired students are using assistive technology for multiple functions. A core set of 13 devices emerged, as well as varying subsets for specific tasks across different subjects. Limitations of the study were the small sample size and possible survey fatigue.

Implications for practitioners

By examining the uses of technology presented in this article, teachers can determine which assistive technology might be worth exploring to use for preparation of materials for students and which to teach others to use independently for reading or preparation of assignments in advanced mathematics courses.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alreck

P. L.

, & Settle

R. B.

(2004). The survey research handbook (3rd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Buteau

Marshall

Jarvis

, & Lavicza

(2010). Integrating computer algebra systems in post-secondary mathematics education: Preliminary results of a literature review. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 17(2), 57–68.

Gagne

Briggs

, & Wager

(1992). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: HBJ College Publishers. HIMS, Inc. (2014). Sense Notetaker v.1. Austin, TX.

Karshmer

Gupta

, & Pontelli

(2009). Mathematics and accessibility: A survey. In Stephanidis

(Ed.), The universal access handbook (pp. 511–5115). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Maneki

(2010). Handling math in braille: A survey. Retrieved from https://nfb.org/images/nfb/publications/bm/bm11/bm1109/bm110909.htm

Mason

McNerney

Davidson

, & McNear

(2000). Shortages of personnel in the low incidence area of blindness. Teaching Exceptional Children, 32(5), 20–24.

Pierce

, & Ball

(2009). Perceptions that may affect teachers’ intention to use technology in secondary mathematics classes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 299–317.

Reed

, & Curtis

(2011). High school teachers’ perspectives on supporting students with visual impairments toward higher education: Access, barriers, and success. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 105(9), 549–559.

Schweikhardt

(2000). Requirements on a mathematical notation for the blind. In R. Vollmar and R. Wagner (Eds.), Computers Helping People with Special Needs, ICCHP 2000: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs, July 17–21, 2000 (pp. 663–670). Wien, Austria: Österreichische Computer Gesellschaft [Austrian Computer Society].

10.

Smith

D. W.

Kelley

Maushak

N. J.

Griffin-Shirley

, & Lan

W. Y.

(2009). Assistive technology competencies for teachers of students with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 103, 457–469.

11.

Zhou

Parker

A. T.

Smith

D. W.

, & Griffin-Shirley

(2011). Assistive technology for students with visual impairments: Challenges and needs in teachers’ preparation programs and practice. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 105(4), 197–210.