Evergreen was a World War I (WWI) adult, inpatient vocational rehabilitation facility for war-blind soldiers, sailors, and marines in the United States. Although Evergreen shared similarities with European war-blind rehabilitation organizations, it was novel in its philosophy and approach. It was also unlike any civilian blind rehabilitation program of its day. Although there are no comprehensive records known to us of how many troops became blind or sustained vision loss during WWI, studying published reports of the veterans served by Evergreen provides some insight into this population. As the United States’ only blind rehabilitation facility for adults, Evergreen achieved several firsts, including having a national scope, being racially integrated (at least to some degree), and innovating a residential family training program. A role model of its day, it is now largely a footnote in the history of blind rehabilitation. We argue that the story of Evergreen contains lessons that should be remembered.
BonfiglioiS. S.TombaP.ViganoA.ZatiA.BenedettiM. G. (2015). The First World War drives rehabilitation toward the modern concepts of disability and participation. European Journal of Physical Rehabilitation and Medicine, 51, 331–336.
2.
BordleyJ. (1919). Reeducation of the blind soldiers. International Record of Medicine and General Practice Clinics, 109, 703–704.
3.
BronnerC. (1921). Carl Bronner. Outlook for the Blind, XV(3), 123–124.
4.
CarletonD. (2002). The Smith-Hughes act (February 23, 1917). In CarletonD. (Ed.), Landmark congressional laws on education (p. 227). Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
FarrellG. (1956). The story of blindness (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Harvard University Press.
8.
Federal Board for Vocational Education. (1917). Methods employed in rehabilitation of the war blind. Washington, DC: Author.
9.
Federal Board for Vocational Education. (1921). Fifth annual report to congress. Washington, DC: Author.
10.
GoodrichG. L.ArditiA.RubinR.KeeffeJ.LeggeG. E. (2008). The low vision timeline: An interactive history. Visual Impairment Research, 10, 67–75.
11.
HalfpennyA. K. (1920). Evergreen. Evergreen Review, 1, 27–28.
12.
KellerH. (1919). O! Brave new world that has such people in’t. Red Cross Magazine, XIV, 31–38, 73–74.
13.
KoestlerF. A. (2004). The unseen minority: A social history of blindness in the United States. New York, NY: AFB Press.
14.
LohrkeF. T. (1993). Motion study for the blind: A review of the Gilbreths’s work with the visually handicapped. International Journal of Public Administration, 16, 667–782.
15.
MiyagawaS. (1999). Journey to excellence: Development of the military and VA blind rehabilitation programs in the 20th century. Lakeville, MN: Galde Press.
OstermeierM. (2010). History of guide dog use by veterans. Military Medicine, 175, 587–593.
18.
Outlook for the Blind. (1918). Sir Arthur Pearson’s visit to America. Outlook for the Blind, Winter, 93–94.
19.
“The past year at the Red Cross Institute for the Blind.” (1920). Evergreen Review, 1, 52–56.
20.
Red Cross Institute for the Blind. (1918). Red Cross Institute for the Blind. Baltimore, MD: Author.
21.
Red Cross Institute for the Blind. (1920a). Braille map of Evergreen. Evergreen Review, 1, 2.
22.
Red Cross Institute for the Blind. (1920b). Committee of direction. Evergreen Review, 1, 19.
23.
Red Cross Institute for the Blind. (1920c). Courses of instruction. Evergreen Review, 1, 84–88.
24.
Red Cross Institute for the Blind. (1920d). Evergreen review. Evergreen Review, 1, 3.
25.
Red Cross Institute for the Blind. (1920e). General Pershing’s talk at the Red Cross. Evergreen Review, 1, 44.
26.
Red Cross Institute for the Blind. (1920f). Helen Keller’s address at Evergreen. Evergreen Review, 1, 36–37.
27.
Red Cross Institute for the Blind. (1920g). Snapshots at Evergreen field day sports. Evergreen Review, 1, 75–77.
28.
Red Cross Institute for the Blind. (1920h). Visit of the Queen of Belgium. Evergreen Review, 1, 1.
29.
SalvanteM. (2015). Thanks to the Great War the blind gets the recognition of his ability to act: The rehabilitation of blinded servicemen in Florence. First World War Studies, 6, 21–35.
30.
The story of Carl Bronner. (1920). The Vocational Summary, III(3), 38–39.
31.
“Survey of Work.” (1920). Survey of work for the blind. The Vocational Summary, III, 3–4.
32.
“Time-study motion picture.” (1919). Blind Americans at Evergreen. The Modern Hospital, XII, 206–207.
U.S. Congress. (1920). Charges against the federal board for vocational education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
35.
WeedF. (1923). General Hospital No. 7, Baltimore, MD. In LynchC.WeedF.W.McAfeeL. (Eds.), The medical department of the United States Army in the World War (Vol. V, pp. 511–513). Washington, DC: U.S. Army Surgeon General’s Office.
36.
WoodsA. C. (1943). The story of the Red Cross Institute for the Blind (1918-1925) in relation to the present problem of the war blinded. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 26, 1011–1023.
