Divergent Thinking: The Performance of Students with Visual Impairments on Abstract and Scenario-Based Tasks and Their Correlates

Abstract

Introduction:

Divergent thinking is a crucial component of effective problem-solving. This study investigated the divergent thinking of students with visual impairments (i.e., blindness or low vision) in three countries and explored the correlates of their performance on two tasks.

Methods:

A sample of 52 students with visual impairments completed two divergent thinking tasks, one traditional Alternate Uses task, and one scenario-based task created for this study. Each student’s teacher of students with visual impairments completed a questionnaire containing demographic, curriculum, and student characteristics.

Results:

Of the correlates examined, teacher-rated academic independence, working on grade level, number of expanded core curriculum (ECC) areas of instruction currently received, and ongoing receipt of assistive technology instruction were significantly related to task performance.

Discussion:

Findings demonstrate the strong relationship between real-life problem-solving, divergent thinking, and academic functioning in students with visual impairments. Further investigation is needed about the relationship between aspects of problem-solving instruction and student outcomes as they relate to divergent thinking.

Implications for practitioners:

Given the connection of divergent thinking to overall problem-solving ability, teachers should assess these skills in students. Using similar scenario-based real-life tasks, they can also incorporate practice opportunities for divergent thinking within ECC instruction.

Keywords

divergent thinking visual impairment problem-solving

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anwar

M. N.

Aness

Khizar

Naseer

Muhammad

(2012). Relationship of creative thinking with the academic achievements of secondary school students. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 1(3), 44–47.

Argyropoulos

Sideridis

G. D.

Botsas

Padeliadu

(2012). Assessing self-regulation in individuals with visual impairments: Generality versus specificity in self-regulatory functioning. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 37(3), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508411406899

Basadur

Hausdorf

P. A.

(1996). Measuring divergent thinking attitudes related to creative problem solving and innovation management. Creativity Research Journal, 9(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0901_3

Beghetto

R. A.

(2010). Creativity in the classroom. In Kaufman

J. C.

Sternberg

R. J.

(Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 447–463). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763205.027

Bijvoet-van den Berg

Hoicka

(2014). Individual differences and age-related changes in divergent thinking in toddlers and preschoolers. Developmental Psychology, 50(6), 1629–1639. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036131

Charles

R. E.

Runco

M. A.

(2001). Developmental trends in the evaluation and divergent thinking of children. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3/4), 417–437. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036131

Cote

Pierce

Higgins

Miller

Tandy

Sparks

(2010). Increasing skill performances of problem solving in students with intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45(4), 512–524.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

A.-G.

Buchner

(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

Gelade

(1995). Creative style and divergent production. Journal of Creative Behavior, 29(1), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1995.tb01422.x

10.

Greenaway

Pring

Schepers

Isaacs

D. P.

Dale

N. J.

, (2017). Neuropsychological presentation and adaptive skills in high-functioning adolescents with visual impairment: A preliminary investigation. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 6(2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2015.1129608

11.

Guilford

J. P.

(1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487

12.

Hartley

Greggs

M. A.

(1997). Divergent thinking in arts and science students: Contrary imaginations at Keele revisited. Studies in Higher Education, 22(1), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079712331381161

13.

Jonassen

(2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300500

14.

Karaoglan Yilmaz

F. G.

Olpak

Y. Z.

Yilmaz

(2018). The effect of the metacognitive support via pedagogical agent on self-regulation skills. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(2), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117707696

15.

Kaufman

J. C.

Kaufman

A. B.

(2004). Applying a creativity framework to animal cognition. New Ideas in Psychology, 22(2), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2004.09.006

16.

Kleibeuker

S. W.

de u

C. K. W.

Crone

E. A.

(2013). The development of creative cognition across adolescence: Distinct trajectories for insight and divergent thinking. Developmental Science, 16(1), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01176.x

17.

Lewis

Allman

C. B.

(2014). Learning, development, and children with visual impairments: The evolution of skills. In Allman

C. B.

Lewis

(Eds.), ECC essentials: Teaching the expanded core curriculum to students with visual impairments (pp. 3–13). AFB Press.

18.

Marsick

V. J.

Watkins

(1990). Informal and incidental learning in the workplace (Routledge Revivals). Routledge.

19.

Martindale

Anderson

Moore

West

A. N.

(1996). Creativity, oversensitivity, and rate of habituation. Personality and Individual Differences, 20(4), 423–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(95)00193-X

20.

Özdas

Batdi

(2017). A thematic-based meta analytic study regarding the effect of creativity on academic success and learning retention. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(3), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i3.2043

21.

Plucker

J. A.

(1999). Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyses of Torrance’s (1958 to present) longitudinal data. Creativity Research Journal, 12(2), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1202_3

22.

Runco

A. A.

Illies

J. J.

Eisenman

(2005). Creativity, originality, and appropriateness: What do explicit instructions tell us about their relationships? Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2005.tb01255.x

23.

Runco

M. A.

(1999). A longitudinal study of exceptional giftedness and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 12(2), 161–164. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1202_8

24.

Runco

M. A.

(2017). Comments on where the creativity research has been and where is it going. Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(4), 308–313. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.189

25.

Torrance

E. P.

(1968). A longitudinal examination of the fourth grade slump in creativity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 12(4), 195–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698626801200401

26.

Wallace

C. E.

Russ

S. W.

(2015). Pretend play, divergent thinking, and math achievement in girls: A longitudinal study. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(3), 296–305. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039006

27.

Wallach

M. A.

Kogan

(1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A critical examination of the creativity-intelligence distinction. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

28.

Ward

W. C.

(1968). Creativity in young children. Child Development, 39(3), 737–754. https://doi.org/10.2307/1126980

29.

C. H.

Cheng

H. M.

McBride-Chang

(2005). Age differences in creativity: Task structure and knowledge base. Creativity Research Journal, 17(4), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1704_3

30.

Wyver

S. R.

Markham

(1999). Divergent thinking of children with severe visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 93(4), 233–236.