A Delphi Approach to Examining the Role of Paraprofessionals and Paraeducators in Orientation and Mobility

Abstract

Introduction: Following a charge from the Orientation and Mobility (O&M) Division of the Association for Education and Rehabilitation of the Blind and Visually Impaired, a study was undertaken to establish a set of parameters for paraprofessionals (also referred to as paraeducators) who could provide services under the direction of credentialed O&M specialists. The primary objective of this study was to establish roles and responsibilities in O&M services for paraprofessionals in the educational system and adult rehabilitation facilities. Methods: A modified Delphi study was conducted which utilized a group of 15 university instructors and 21 experienced O&M professionals. Each group was given a listing of potential roles and asked to indicate which could be taught, reinforced, or were not appropriate roles for paraprofessionals. A consensus rate of 70% within groups and between groups was established for acceptance of a specific role. Two rounds were needed to reach a final consensus. Results: Consensus within and between groups was reached for reinforcing roles for 48 of 55 indoor skills and 4 of 25 outdoor skills. There were no skills in either area that reached 70% consensus for a direct teaching role. Sixteen skills were designated as not appropriate for a paraprofessional to have a role. Discussion: Only a limited number of skills were selected as appropriate for paraprofessionals in O&M. Those that reached consensus were limited to a reinforcing role rather than a direct teaching role. It was concluded that O&M specialists should have authority to determine which paraprofessionals have the capacity to reinforce the O&M curriculum. The O&M specialists should provide the preparation for the paraprofessionals through provision of materials, observations of lessons, and direction from the professional. A written agreement should be established that includes a job description and the specific skills to be reinforced.

Keywords

orientation and mobility O&M professional roles paraprofessionals paraeducators

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Academy for Certification of Vision Rehabilitation & Education Professionals (ACVREP). (2024). Section 6—Code of ethics. In Certified Orientation and Mobility Specialist (COMS) handbook (pp. 12–15). https://www.acvrep.org/certifications/coms

Atlantic Provinces Special Education Authority (APSEA). (2019). Orientation and mobility delivery guidelines. https://prcvi.org/media/1631/apsea-om-delivery-guidelines-pdf.pdf

Bailey

Head

(1993). Providing O&M services to children and youth with severe multiple disabilities. RE:view, 25(2), 57–66.

Cmar

J. L.

Griffin-Shirley

Kelley

Lawrence

(2015). The role of the orientation and mobility specialist in public schools [Position paper of the Division on Visual Impairments and Deafblindness]. Council for Exceptional Children.

Diamond

I. R.

Grant

R. C.

Feldman

B. M.

Pencharz

P. B.

Ling

S. C.

Moore

A. M.

Wales

P. W.

(2014). Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(4), 401–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.002

Fazzi

D. L.

Barlow

J. M.

(2017). Orientation and mobility techniques: A guide for the practitioner (2nd ed.). AFB Press.

Fazzi

D. L.

Naimy

B. J.

Casias

(2024). Teaching orientation and mobility to school-age children. In Wiener

W. R.

Wall Emerson

R. S.

Blasch

B. B.

(Eds.), Foundations of orientation and mobility: Instructional strategies and practical applications (4th ed., Vol. 2; pp. 233–294). APH Press.

Foth

Efstathiou

Vanderspank-Wright

Ufholz

L. A.

Dütthorn

Zimansky

Humphrey-Murto

(2016). The use of Delphi and Nominal Group technique in nursing education: A review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 60, 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.04.015

Fullan

(2005). Leadership and sustainability. Corwin Press.

10.

Griffin-Shirley

Trusty

Rickard

(2000). Orientation and mobility. In Koenig

Holbrook

(Eds.), Foundations of education: Instructional strategies for teaching children and youths with visual impairments (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 529–568). AFB Press.

11.

Guskey

T. R.

(2000). Evaluating professional development. Corwin Press.

12.

Hatton

D. D.

McWilliam

R. A.

Winton

P. J.

(2003). Family-centered practices for infants and toddlers with visual impairments. Early Intervention Training Center for Infants and Toddlers with Visual Impairments, FPG Child Development Institute, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

13.

Hsu

C.-C.

Sandford

B. A.

(2007). The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 12(10), 1–8.

14.

Jacobs

R. L.

Park

(2009). A proposed conceptual framework of workplace learning: Implications for theory development and research in human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 8(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/153448430933426

15.

Jandhyala

(2020). Delphi, non-RAND modified Delphi, RAND/UCLA appropriateness method and a novel group awareness and consensus methodology for consensus measurement: A systematic literature review. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 36(11), 1873–1887. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2020.1816946

16.

Joyce

Showers

(2002). Student achievement through staff development. Longman.

17.

Kaiser

J. T.

Rosenblum

L. P.

Herzberg

T. S.

(2020). Building consensus about the functional vision assessment process: A Delphi study. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 114(6), 461–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X20971937

18.

Killian

(2002). What works in the elementary school: Results-based staff development. National Staff Development Council.

19.

La Grow

Long

(2011). Orientation and mobility: Techniques for independence (2nd ed.). Association for the Education and Rehabilitation of the Blind and Visually Impaired.

20.

Lewis

D'Andrea

F. M.

Rosenblum

L. P.

(2012). The development of accepted performance items to demonstrate competence in literary braille. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 106(4), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1210600402

21.

McEwen

I. R.

(2009). Providing physical therapy services: Under Parts B & C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Section on Pediatrics, American Physical Therapy Association.

22.

Okoli

Pawlowski

S. D.

(2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002

23.

Silberman

R. K.

Sacks

S. Z.

Wolffe

(1998). Instructional strategies for educating students who have visual impairments with severe disabilities. In Sacks

Silberman

(Eds.), Educating students who have visual impairments with other disabilities (pp. 101–138). Paul H. Brookes.

24.

Szabo

Panikkar

R. K.

(2017). Bridging the gap between physical therapy and orientation and mobility in schools: Using a collaborative team approach for students with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 111(6), 495–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1711100602

25.

Wiener

Hill

(1993). An innovative model for training orientation and mobility assistants. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 87(5), 134–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X9308700506

26.

Wiener, W., & Siffermann, E. (2024). History and progression of the profession of orientation and mboility. In W. Wiener, R Wall Emerson, & B Blasch (Eds.). Foundations of orientation and mobility, (4th ed., pp. 608-654). APH Press.