The purpose of this project is to identify rates of depression and document mental health needs of adults with diabetes who obtained care in free clinics. Data were collected to determine if there is a relationship between diabetes and depression and missed appointments in a sample of patients who were low-income, uninsured, and represented a variety of racial groups.
Methods
A sample of 183 adults with diabetes participated by completing paper and computerized questionnaires. Instruments included the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (to measure prevalence of depression), the RAND 36 Health Survey (to measure quality of health), the Audit of Diabetes Dependent Quality of Life (to measure diabetes-dependent quality of life), and the Diabetes Empowerment Scale (to measure self-efficacy).
Results
The prevalence of depression at a moderate or greater level in the sample was found to be 30.1%. Levels of quality of health and self-efficacy were found to be reduced among those with the presence of depression. A significant increase in the rate of depression was found among those who had attended the free clinic for a longer period. No significant differences were found in diabetes-dependent quality of life and missed appointments among those with depression compared with those without.
Conclusions
Rates of depression among adults with diabetes in a free clinic setting were found to be comparable with the highest rates reported by other studies of insured populations. Results of this study support the need to develop mental health treatment programs for free clinic settings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
National Diabetes Fact Sheet, 2007. Center for Disease Control and Prevention Web site. http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/pdf/ndfs_2007.pdf . Updated April 3, 2009. Accessed April 6, 2009.
2.
Bandura A.Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Ann Rev Psychol . 2001;52(1):1-26.
3.
Senecal C., Nouwen A., White D.Motivation and dietary self-care in adults with diabetes: are self-efficacy and autonomous self-regulation complementary or competing constructs? Health Psychol. 2000;19(5):452-457.
4.
Sousa VD, Zauszniewski JA, Musil CM, Lea PJ, Davis SARelationships among self-care agency, self-efficacy, self-care, and glycemic control. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2005 ;19(3):217-230.
5.
National Institute of Mental Health Web site. http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/index.shtml. Updated April 2008. Accessed May 16, 2008.
6.
Depression statistics.Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance Web site. http://www.dbsalliance.org/site/PageServer?pagename=about_statistics_depression. Updated May 2006. Accessed May 16, 2008.
7.
Mental health: culture, race, and ethnicity.US Public Health Service Web site. http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/mentalhealth/cre/ . Accessed May 16, 2008.
8.
Mauksch L., Tucker S., Katon W., et al. Mental illness, functional impairment, and patient preferences for collaborative care in an uninsured, primary care population. J Fam Pract. 2001;50(1):41-47.
9.
Mims S.A sustainable behavioral health program integrated with public health primary care. J Public Health Manage Pract. 2006; 12(5):456-461.
10.
Anderson R. , Freedland K., Clouse R., Lustman P.The prevalence of comorbid depression in adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care . 2001;24(6):1069-1078.
11.
Anderson D. , Horton C., O’Toole L., Brownson C., Fazzone P., Fisher E.Integrating depression care with diabetes care in real-world settings: lessons from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation diabetes initiative. Diabetes Spectrum . 2007 ;20(1):10-16.
12.
Ciechanowski PS, Katon WJ, Russo JE, Walker EAThe patient-provider relationship: attachment theory and adherence to treatment in diabetes. Am J Psychiatry . 2001;158(1):29-35.
13.
De Groot M. , Pinkerman B., Wagner J., Hockman E.Depression treatment and satisfaction in a multicultural sample of type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients . Diabetes Care. 2006;29(3):549-553.
14.
Katon W., Von Korff M., Ciechanowski P., et al. Behavioral and clinical factors associated with depression among individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(4):914-920.
15.
Olvera A., Stewart S., Galindo L., Stephans J.Diabetes, depression, and metabolic control in Latinas. Cult Divers Ethnic Minority Psychol. 2007;13(3):225-231.
16.
Ciechanowski PS, Katon WJ, Russo JEDepression and diabetes: impact of depressive symptoms on adherence, function, and costs. Arch Intern Med . 2000;160(21):3278-3285.
17.
Ciechanowski PS, Hirsch IB, Katon WJInterpersonal predictors of HbA1c in patients with type I diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25(4):731-736.
18.
Ciechanowski PS, Katon WJ, Russo JE, Hirsch IBThe relationship of depressive symptoms to symptom reporting, self-care and glucose control in diabetes. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2003;25:246-252.
19.
Ciechanowski PS, Russo JE, Katon WJ, et al. Where is the patient? The association of psychosocial factors and missed primary care appointments in patients with diabetes. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2006;28(1):9-17.
20.
Ciechanowski PS, Russo JE, Katon WJ, et al. The association of patient relationship style and outcome in collaborative care treatment for depression in patients with diabetes. Med Care. 2006; 44(3):283-292.
21.
Katon WJ, Rutler C., Simon G., et al. The association of comorbid depression with mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(11):2668-2672.
22.
Lin E., Katon W., Von Korff M., et al. Relationship of depression and diabetes self-care, medication adherence, and preventive care. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(9):2154-2160.
23.
Ludman, EJ, Katon W., Russo J., et al. Depression and diabetes symptom burden. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2004;26:430-436.
24.
Simon GE, Katon WJ, Lin E., et al. Diabetes complications and depression as predictors of health service costs. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2005;27(5):344-351.
25.
Von Korff M. , Katon W., Lin EH, et al. Work disability among individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(6):1326-1332.
26.
Egede LE, Zheng D., Simpson K.Comorbid depression is associated with increased health care use and expenditures in individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(3):464-470.
27.
Katon WJ, Fan MY, Unutzer J., Taylor JT, Pincus H., Schoenbaum M.Depression and diabetes: a potentially lethal combination. J Intern Med. 2008;23(10):1571-1575.
28.
Karter A., Parker M., Moffet H., et al. Missed appointments and poor glycemic control: an opportunity to identify high-risk diabetic patients. Med Care. 2004;42(2):110-115.
29.
Rhee MK, Slocum W., Ziemer DC, et al. Patient adherence improves glycemic control. Diabetes Educ. 2005;31(2):240-250.
30.
Weinger K., McMurrich SJ, Yi JP, Lin S., Rodriguez M.Psychological characteristics of frequent short-notice cancellers of diabetes medical and education appointments. Diabetes Care . 2005;28(7):1791-1793.
31.
Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2006 (Publication No. P60-233). US Census Bureau Web site. http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www./releases/archives/population/011910.html. Updated November 17, 2008. Accessed May 16, 2008.
32.
Cashman S., Savageau J., Lemay C., Ferguson W.Patient health status and appointment keeping in an urban community health center. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2004 ;15:474-488.
33.
Isaacs SL, Jellinek P.Grant watch report: is there a (volunteer) doctor in the house? Free clinics and volunteer physician referral networks in the United States. Health Aff. 2007;26(3):871-876.
34.
Blount A.Integrated Primary Care: The Future of Medical and Mental Health Collaboration . New York, NY: Norton; 1998.
35.
Blount A., Schoenbaum M., Kathol R., et al. The economics of behavioral health services in medical settings: a summary of the evidence. Prof Psychol Res Pr. 2007;38(3):290-297.
36.
Cameron JK, Mauksch LBCollaborative family healthcare in an uninsured primary-care population: stages of integration. Fam Syst Health. 2002 ;20(4):343-363.
37.
Hegel MT, Imming J., Cyr-Provost M., Noel PH, Arean PA, Unutzer J.Role of behavioral health professionals in a collaborative stepped care treatment model for depression in primary care: Project IMPACT. Fam Syst Health. 2002;20(3):265-277.
38.
American Diabetes Association.American Diabetes Association: clinical practice recommendations 2008 . Diabetes Care. 2008;31(suppl 1):S1-S119.
39.
Snoek FJQuality of life: a closer look at measuring patients’ well-being . Diabetes Care. 2000;13(1):24-28.
40.
National Academies Press.2004. Health literacy: a prescription to end confusion. http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=10883&page=302. Assessed June 13, 2009.
41.
Patient Health Questionnaire-9.Pfizer Web site. http://www.phqscreeners.com/. Assessed March 22, 2008.
42.
Medical Outcomes Study: 36 Item Short Form Survey.Rand Health Web site. http://www.rand.org/health/surveys_tools/mos/mos_core_36item.html Assessed March 22, 2008.
43.
SF-36.QualityMetrics Web site. 2005. SF-36 . http://www.qualitymetric.com/products/ . Accessed March 22, 2008.
44.
Bradley C., Gorton T., Symonds E., Martin A., Plowright R.The development of an individualized questionnaire measure of perceived impact of diabetes on quality of life: the ADDQoL. Qual Life Res . 1999;8:79-91.
45.
Anderson R. , Funnell M., Fitzgerald J., Marrero D.The diabetes empowerment scale. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(6):739-743.
46.
Butcher JN, Perry JN, Atlis MMValidity and utility of computer-based test interpretation. Psychol Assess. 2000;12(1):6-18.
47.
Ogles BM, France CR, Lunnen KM, Bell MT, Goldfarb M.Computerized depression screening and awareness. Community Ment Health J. 1998;34(1):27-38.
48.
Bendtsen P. , Holmqvist M., Johansson K.Implementation of computerized alcohol screening and advice in an emergency department-a nursing staff perspective . Accid Emerg Nurs. 2007; 15(1):3-9.
49.
Edwards RL, Edwards SL, Bryner J., Cunningham K., Rogers A., Slattery MLA computer-assisted data collection system for use in a multicenter study of American Indians and Alaska Natives: SCAPES. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2008;90(1):8-55.
50.
Kable S., Henry R., Sanson-Fisher R., Ireland M., Cockburn J.Is a computer questionnaire of childhood asthma acceptable in general practice?Fam Pract. 2006;23(1):88-90.
51.
Thornberry J., Bhaskar B., Krulewitch CJ, et al. Audio computerized self-report interview use in prenatal clinics: audio computer-assisted self interview with touch screen to detect alcohol consumption in pregnant women: application of a new technology to an old problem. Comput Inform Nurs. 2002;20(2):46-54.
52.
QDSNova Research Company Web site. http://www.novaresearch.com/products/QDS/freeTrial.cfm. Assessed March 22, 2008.
Sundaram M. , Kavookjian J., Patrick JH, Miller L., Madhavan SS, Scott V.Quality of life, health status, and clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients. Quality Life Res. 2007;16:165-177.
55.
Spencer MS, Kieffer EC, Sinco BR, et al. Diabetes-specific emotional distress among African Americans and Hispanics with type 2 diabetes. J Health Care Poor Underserved . 2006;17:88-105.
56.
Cheyette C.Weight no more: a randomized controlled trial for people with type 2 diabetes on insulin therapy. Pract Diabetes Int. 2007;24(9):450-456.
57.
Lowe J., Linjawi S., Mensch M., James K., Attia J.Flexible eating and flexible insulin dosing in patients with diabetes: results of an intensive self-management course. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008; 80:439-443.
58.
Utz SW, Williams IC, Jones R., et al. Culturally tailored intervention for rural African Americans with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2008;34(5):854-865.
59.
Bernstein J. , Mutschler P., Bernstein E.Keeping mammography referral appointments: motivation, health beliefs, and access barriers experienced by older minority women. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2000;45(4):308-313.
60.
Campbell JD , Chez RA, Queen T., Barcelo A., Patron E.The no-show rate in a high-risk obstetric clinic. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2000 ;9(8):891-896.
61.
Perlis TE, Jarlais DC, Friedman SR, Arasteh K., Turner CFAudio-computerized self-interviewing versus face-to-face interviewing for research data collection at drug abuse treatment programs. Addiction. 2004;99(7):885-896.
62.
Turner CF, Ku L., Rogers SM, Linderg LD, Pleck JHAdolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science. 1998;280(5365):867-873.
